July 18, 2017

Sekulow, Trump's Attorney Blames Secret Service for The Meeting

Running the full Sunday morning media gauntlet, the president’s lawyer, Jay Sekulow, presented Team Trump’s latest line of defense in the mounting Donald Trump Jr. scandal: blaming his meeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer whom he was told would have damaging information about Hillary Clinton, on the Secret Service. “I wonder why the Secret Service—if this was nefarious—why the Secret Service allowed these people in?” Sekulow mused, pitching his self-consciously rhetorical question on ABC’s This Morning. “The president had Secret Service protection at that point, and that raised a question with me.”

As Sekulow sought to bolster Trump Jr.’s case via the media, the president took his own shotgun approach to Twitter. “HillaryClinton can illegally get the questions to the Debate & delete 33,000 emails but my son Don is being scorned by the Fake News media?” Forty minutes later, he discharged a characteristic follow-up: “With all of its phony unnamed sources & highly slanted & even fraudulent reporting, #Fake News is DISTORTING DEMOCRACY in our country.” In between, he tempered his tone enough to extend a hearty thanks to former campaign adviser Michael Caputo—who worked in Russia during the 1990s and for Gazprom Media in the early 2000s—for testifying “so powerfully” that there was no Russian collusion in his “winning” campaign before the House Intelligence Committee, and also showing his appreciation for those who had cheered him at the United States Women’s Open, played at the Trump National Golf Club, despite calls for it to be moved because of his record of derogatory behavior towards women. “Thank you to all of the supporters, who far out-numbered the protesters, yesterday at the Women's U.S. Open. Very cool!” 

Waving to the crowds from the viewing stand Saturday, Trump must have received some welcome respite at the golf tournament. Despite his attempts to appear unperturbed by his son’s scandal, he is in the midst of the most turbulent patch of his presidency. His case has not been helped by the undulating explanations his cohort have offered for the meeting which, prefaced by a now-public e-mail chain titled “Russia - Clinton - private and confidential,” was also attended by Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and his campaign chairman, Paul Manafort. Initially claiming the meeting was focused on the contentious issue of U.S.-Russian adoption, it has since emerged that its ostensible purpose (from Trump Jr.’s perspective, at least), was to gather information about Clinton as part of the Russian government’s efforts to help elect his father. Another twist emerged Friday, when it was revealed that Rinat Akhmetshin, a Russian-born lobbyist who served in the Soviet army, attended the meeting, and said Trump Jr. asked Veselnitskaya for information on illicit money flowing into the Democratic National Committee but that Veselnitskaya had nothing substantive to provide—although he noted that she may have left several documents. (Akhmetshin has been alleged by U.S. officials to have ties to Russian intelligence, a claim he has denied.)

It was perhaps predictable, then, that Sekulow’s attempts to shift blame over to the Secret Service were met with a flat incredulity. Mason Brayman, a Secret Service spokesman, told Reuters in a statement that the agency was not protecting Trump Jr. in June 2016 when he attended the meeting. “Thus we would not have screened anyone he was meeting with at that time,” Brayman said. According to Think Progress, Kushner and Manafort were not under Secret Service protection at that point, either. Brayman was echoed by former Secret Service agent Jonathan Wackrow, who told CNN on Sunday that only a physical screening was required to enter Trump Tower at the time, as Trump was just a candidate. Speaking to Yahoo, Akhmetshin said that “no one asked us for IDs” when he and Veselnitskaya entered Trump’s namesake Midtown high-rise. “We literally walked in,” he said.

Fueling speculation that Trump himself was present at the meeting, Sekulow’s reference to the Secret Service is either false, or stupidly clumsy. Both, of course, are possibilities. Trump has repeatedly claimed he knew nothing about the meeting, despite the fact he is reported to have been present in Trump Tower at the time, and, forty minutes after the meeting, began tweeting about Clinton’s e-mails. Just days later, he announced plans to deliver a “major speech” focusing on a discussion of “all of the things that have taken place with the Clintons.” The speech never happened. Perhaps Trump was stripped of his physic tendencies.

That Trump knew nothing of his son’s eager attempts to procure dirt on Clinton seems even more unlikely in light of a Yahoo News report Thursday, which claims Trump’s lawyers knew about the meeting, and e-mails, in June. This was followed by an ABC report, which alleges that two weeks before Trump Jr. published screenshots of the e-mail exchange arranging the meeting, the president’s re-election campaign paid $50,000 in legal fees to the attorney Trump fils is now represented by. The payment was revealed in a Q2 FEC report filed on Saturday by the Trump campaign. On June 27, criminal defense attorney Alan Futerfas was paid by the campaign for “legal consulting.” On July 10, he was hired to represent the president’s son. The filing doesn’t indicate that the June 27 disbursement of funds to Futerfas was made for the purpose of representing Trump Jr. (Futerfas has since dubbed the unfolding scandal, “much ado about nothing.”)

The president’s claim to ignorance, given the timeline and money trail, strains credulity. If Trump’s lawyers knew about the meeting, the Secret Service allegedly knew about the meeting, his campaign paid Trump Jr.’s lawyer, and Trump himself was in the same building at the time of the meeting, the White House can expect nothing less than the barrage of disbelief countering their surreal set of explanations. Already, the administration has lied repeatedly about who attended the meeting and what was discussed. That neither the president’s son, son-in-law, nor campaign manager ever told him about a high-level meeting as part of an explicit Kremlin plot to help him win election seems uncharacteristic.

Sekulow’s channeling of blame towards the Secret Service has backfired, swiveling attention back to Russia just as the Trump administration was hoping to restore the president’s image with a string of “theme weeks,” the latest of which, starting today, and called “Made in America,” focuses on American workers and goods they produce. But, as suspicion mounts, it’s hard to change the subject. Especially when the White House is offering excuses that require a suspension of disbelief too extreme even for their standards, where drawing Shakespearian parallels has become just a tired cliché. The Trump family want to focus on trade, but they will find it hard to shift attention away from the Russia scandal, made right in the midst of Trump’s America.

    Vanity fair

More from ABC:                       

After one of the president's lawyers cited U.S. Secret Service inaction in his defense of Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian attorney, whom the younger Trump believed to be in possession of incriminating information about Hillary Clinton, attention has turned to the agency's duties in enforcing the law. 
"I wonder why the Secret Service, if this was nefarious, why the Secret Service allowed these people in," President Trump's personal attorney Jay Sekulow said Sunday on ABC News' "This Week" of the June 2016 meeting. 
The law enforcement agency quickly responded to his question Sunday, saying in a statement, "Donald Trump Jr. was not under Secret Service protection in June 2016." "Thus we would not have screened anyone he was meeting with at that time," the statement continued. 
The agency is authorized to protect "major presidential and vice presidential candidates" plus their spouses, the latter within 120 days of the general election, according to Section 3056 of the U.S. Code of Laws, which outlines the "powers, authorities and duties" of the Secret Service. 
The secretary of homeland security decides who qualifies as major candidates. 6 months in, a record low for Trump, with troubles from Russia to health care
Children are protected if they are the offspring of a sitting president or vice president or of a former president until they reach age 16, though the secretary of homeland security may authorize additional security if he or she determines that "information or conditions warrant such protection." 
No provision is made for candidates' immediate family members other than spouses before the election. 
Even if Donald Trump Jr. had a Secret Service detail in June 2016, it's unclear clear whether its duties would have included discovering the nature of a meeting, other than to ensure his safety. While agents are legally able to "make arrests without warrant for any offense against the United States," they do not traditionally sit in on private meetings and would, therefore, not necessarily be aware of any possible malfeasance. 
While Donald Trump Sr. had Secret Service protection during the presidential campaign, it would not have included vetting people who met with members of his campaign staff. The agency didn't address whether it even knew about the meeting. 
Donald Trump Jr. released emails last week concerning arrangements to meet with a Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, with the hope of receiving damning information about Clinton. The meeting came under additional scrutiny Friday with the revelation that additional people with connections to the Russian government attended the meeting, including a longtime lobbyist. 
Sekulow's comment about the Secret Service was met with criticism on Twitter on Sunday, including from Frances Townsend, a former homeland security adviser to President George W. Bush, and Richard W. Painter, Bush's ethics lawyer. 

No comments:

Featured Posts

George Takei' Accuser Retracts Story_Not Everything That Shines is Real

  Last November, a man named Scott R. Brunton accused George Takei of  groping him without consent  back in 1981. The men were...