Showing posts with label Health Care LGBTQ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health Care LGBTQ. Show all posts

November 7, 2019

HHS Broads The Field For Opt Outs Against LGBT in Health

             Image result for hhs health against lgbt
Drawing immediate and widespread condemnation, the Trump administration on November 1 proposed a new rule giving recipients of Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) funding — including adoption and foster care agencies — the ability to discriminate on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and religion.
The rule, which would unravel President Barack Obama’s 2016 rule banning recipients of HHS funding from discrimination, marks the latest development in a visible rightward shift at HHS under the Trump administration. The move came roughly six months after HHS unveiled a proposal that erased Obamacare rules protecting individuals on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation and nine months after the agency granted taxpayer-funded foster care agencies in South Carolina with an exemption from HHS nondiscrimination rules.
The rule was unveiled on a Friday afternoon, but that didn’t stop LGBTQ groups, progressive religious organizations, advocates for seniors, and others from sounding alarms about the anticipated effects of the rule. Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York has vowed to challenge the rule in courts. 
If finalized, the rule would apply broadly, affecting foster care agencies, HIV prevention services, senior care offerings, and other recipients of federal funding from HHS. 
HHS claimed in a November 1 statement that the rule realigns the agency in accordance with the Constitution, federal statutes, and Supreme Court decisions. The administration contends that those precedents and laws prevent the government from infringing on religious freedom, but said nothing about the way in which the latest rule impacts LGBTQ Americans. 
The Coalition for Homeless Youth, which is dedicated to assisting runaway and homeless youth and consists of dozens of New York-based member organizations ranging from the Ali Forney Center to the Hetrick-Martin Institute, pointed to the high percentage of homeless LGBTQ youth as it blasted the most recent proposed rule.
“Today’s rule sent a clear message that this administration doesn’t care about [LGBT youth’s] well-being,” Jamie Powlovich, the coalition’s executive director, said. “This is not okay.”
Advocacy and Services for LGBT Elders (SAGE), an organization dedicated to serving the needs of queer seniors, noted in a written statement that the rule targets programs benefitting seniors and warned that “their access to their programs is at risk.”
“This latest announcement from the Trump administration is yet another salvo in the war the administration has conducted against the most basic rights of LGBT people,” SAGE said. “In this year that marks the 50th anniversary of the Stonewall uprising, enough is enough. The federal government should be championing non-discrimination protections, not advancing discrimina­tion.”
Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, described Trump’s move as “an abuse of taxpayer dollars” in the name of “empowering hatred and bigotry towards society’s most vulnerable members.”
“Stigma and prejudice are fueling a public health crisis among transgender people across the country, one that manifests itself as suicide, addiction, intimate partner violence, and HIV,” Keisling said. “Enabling providers of life-saving services to worsen these crises by rejecting transgender people is a moral crime and a severe abdication of HHS’s mission to preserve public health.”
ACT UP New York also voiced outrage, saying in a tweet that the rule “will disproportionately impact our queer, trans, and non-binary siblings and HIV and STI related initiatives. Shame on this administration for attempting to erase us.”
Like all other proposed rules, there will be a waiting period during which folks can submit feedback to the administration via comments. In the meantime, Cuomo, who called the move “heartless and dumb as it would deny countless children a loving family and a safe place to call home,” said in a tweet that he would take legal action against the administration, but did not elaborate upon his plans.
Expectedly, Trump’s proposal drew praise from religious leaders who hailed the move as a win for religious liberty. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops unveiled a rosy statement commending the administration and griping about the Obama-era rule.
“To restrict faith-based organizati­ons’ work by infringing on religious freedom — as the 2016 rule threatened to do — is unfair and serves no one, especially the children in need of these services,” the group stated. “We welcome today’s proposed rule modifications and look forward to reviewing and commenting on them further.”
New Ways Ministry, a group dedicated to LGBTQ Catholics, specifically called out the bishops for their support of a proposal that New Ways said: “is not for the poor, but harshly against them.”
“This new rule, now in effect, will damage thousands and potentially millions of Americans lives,” New Ways Ministry’s associate director, Robert Shine, said in a written statement. “Children in need of foster or adoptive parents will be deprived of loving homes as their potential parents face discrimination. And some of society’s most vulnerable groups who already struggle, like youth experiencing homelessness, people living with HIV, and those seeking treatment for addiction, will have their sufferings compounded.”

October 16, 2019

In Boston An LGBTQ Gym Empowers The Community For Physical Health

Justice Williams with gym-goers and kettlebells at CORE in Brookline, Mass.
Robin Lubbock/WBUR

On a recent Sunday in a tiny gym just outside of Boston, physical trainer Justice Williams teaches Leo Morris a stretch called the Brettzel.
"Yasss," Williams shouts. "There you go. Elbows down."
"Jesus," Morris says, exhausted.
"Yass," Williams shouts again. "And hold. Very nice."
Morris, who is nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns, is among about 10 people working out who identify as gay, trans and/or queer.
This is "Queer Gym." It's one of a few workout spaces explicitly for LGBTQ folks that's cropped up in North America in recent years. Williams, who started this pop-up gym, says it's a place where people can work out if they're in the LGBTQ+ community and don't feel comfortable in regular gyms. He says going to a gym can be an awkward experience for many people, but that vulnerability is amplified when your body or mannerisms don't conform to people's interpretation of how you should be.
"[Gyms] are hyper-masculine, they're toxic, they're about an aesthetic," Williams says. "Being part of the LGBT community, I've observed and noticed that people don't feel comfortable in gyms today."
Morris, who Williams is teaching how to Brettzel stretch, recently had top surgery — which is an operation to remove breast tissue to reflect a person's gender expression.
"My body looks a little bit different than a lot of the other peoples' who are in the gym," they say.
Justice Williams talks Eddie Maisonet through a crawl to side kick.
Robin Lubbock/WBUR

And Morris says that causes some people to stare.
"When you're working out, you just want to focus on your workout. But when you know that other people are staring at you and then sometimes talking about you, it can be distracting," Morris says. "It can be demoralizing, you know when you're supposed to be pumping yourself up in the gym."
Eddie Maisonet, who is trans, says he wears sleeveless shirts when he works out and has also noticed people staring at the scars from his top surgery. But Maisonet says at Queer Gym, the visibility is only positive.
"Here, we're looking at each other, but we're so supportive," he says. "It's people trying to take pointers or make sure you're not hurting yourself as opposed to feeling like a spectacle."
Maisonet says other physical trainers he's worked with didn't know how to work with trans people. But Williams does.
"If I tell Justice, 'yo, this hurts', he'll give me a modification or tell me to take a break," Maisonet says. "So, I feel listened to and I feel a lot stronger, and that kind of confidence — there are not many places in my life where I can get that."
Creating confidence is why Williams says he became a personal trainer. Williams is trans, too. Ten years ago Williams needed to lose weight before taking testosterone, and couldn't find a personal trainer who understood his journey.
"And that forced me to learn on my own so that I could teach the proper way to work out, to be in my body, to polish my armor," Williams says.
And today, Williams' armor couldn't be shinier. Now, he's hoping to offer that protection to whoever comes to Queer Gym, a place he says honors queer people's existence. He says the ultimate goal is to arm people in his community with the confidence to navigate all gyms.
But until then, Williams says he'll try to keep Queer Gym around for as long as necessary. 

August 6, 2019

New Study Shows LGBT Cancer Survivors Receive Less Follow Up Care and Screening

                                      Image result for lgbt cancer survivors

New research shows the difficulties many LGBT people face, even after they beat cancer.

A study of more than 70,000 cancer survivors conducted by Boston University researchers shows that LGBT cancer survivors receive less access to follow-up care for preventing and detecting recurrences, and screening for long-term effects of cancer treatments than their heterosexual counterparts.
That can lead such sexual minorities, especially LGBT women, to suffer from poorer mental and physical health post-cancer in a country where there could be more than 1 million LGBT cancer survivors in need of care.

"There is a silent epidemic," says study author Uli Boehmer, an associate professor of community health sciences at the Boston University School of Public Health.

Get the latest health, medicine and science news sent to your inbox each week with CommonHealth's newsletter. Subscribe here.

The research adds to evidence suggesting the LGBT community faces discrimination and insensitivity in health care.

Boehmer notes that LGBT people, especially women, are more likely to have jobs that do not provide health insurance and also struggle more often to afford co-payments for follow-up visits.

Furthermore, the study highlights a significant lack of data collection about LGBT cancer survivors' experiences with medical care, suggesting doctors don't yet know the extent of the problem.

Boehmer, who has studied cancer in the LGBT community for more than 30 years, says the fight to bridge the knowledge gap remains frustrating.

"We don't even have data yet on the types of treatments they get or if they're being treated according to guidelines or not," says Boehmer. "We need to chip away at this big black hole where we know very little about what's going on."

August 4, 2019

Trump Obamare Changes Goes After The Health of Gay, Transgender in The US

LGBTQ rights have come a long way in the U.S. But the community still faces threats in the form of legalization, discrimination and even violence. Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

Trump's proposal would put LGBTQ lives at risk. The right to health cannot be obfuscated by the political or social beliefs of others. 

Katherine Archuleta , Opinion contributor

As a former director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management under President Barack Obama, I oversaw the federal government’s 2-million-strong civilian workforce on everything from human resource policy to retirement benefits to health care. This included implementation of all regulations outlined in the Affordable Care Act, including Section 1557 which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability in certain health programs or activities.
This section covers discrimination on the basis of gender identity, but the Trump-Pence White House has needlessly proposed a new regulation that would cruelly strip the ACA of specific protections for LGBTQ patients, specifically transgender people. This proposed regulation callously puts lives at risk, and it’s imperative the American people make their voices heard on why this it is dangerous and unacceptable.
On June 14, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a proposed regulation based on a court's outrageous claim that the ACA's protection against discrimination on the basis of gender identity is “likely unlawful.”  This initiated a 60-day public comment period that runs through Aug. 12. In a press release sent out by HHS, Roger Severino, the Director of the department's Office of Civil Rights, offered this ratonale: “When Congress prohibited sex discrimination, it did so according to the plain meaning of the term, and we are making our regulations conform.”

Denying care over personal beliefs 

This is a bad faith and incorrect view of “sex discrimination,” but it’s unsurprising coming from Mr. Severino. His long history of attacking the civil rights of LGBTQ people and women includes calling same-sex marriage part of a “radical” agenda, defending the abusive practice of so-called “conversion therapy, and espousing anti-choice opinions, even at the expense of an individual’s health care. He has said that being LGBTQ is “against your biology” and stated that sexual orientation, when compared to race, is an issue of “character.” 
This is not a person who prioritizes the health and safety of all Americans but, rather, consistently seeks to push his personal beliefs on the citizens who look to him for quality and safety in our their health care system.
Over the past two decades, federal courts have made it clear that sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 covers LGBTQ people due to discrimination based on sex stereotyping. Numerous federal agencies, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, have reaffirmed this interpretation and incorporated it into their policies.
Simply put, there is longstanding precedent for ensuring LGBTQ people, particularly transgender people, are free from discrimination in health care spaces, which makes this administration’s attacks on the medical access of LGBTQ people all the more heinous.

Don't inflict harm on LGBTQ people

All medical access for all LGBTQ people and their loved ones is affected by this proposed regulation and the blanket "religious freedom" exemptions it would offer: a gay man who goes into the emergency room with a broken arm, a lesbian with cancer, a bisexual person with diabetes, a trans child getting immunizations prior to the start of the school year. This regulation goes against everything medical science has fought to make clear: that the right to health cannot be obfuscated by the political or social beliefs of others.
In a 2009 survey echoed in later studies, Lambda Legal found that 56% of lesbian, gay and bisexual people and 70% of transgender and gender non-conforming people reported experiencing discrimination by health care providers — including refusal of care, harsh language and physical roughness because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. In a free society that places human rights and life above personal beliefs and petty differences, that is unacceptable.
It is imperative the public submit comments urging the Trump-Pence White House and HHS to abandon this reckless proposed regulation that would inflict cruel and unnecessary harm on marginalized communities.
Katherine Archuleta is a founding partner at Dimension Strategies and was the director of the Office of Personnel Management under President Barack Obama. Follow her on Twitter: @Archuleta2012
You can read diverse opinions from our Board of Contributors and other writers on the Opinion front page, on Twitter @usatodayopinion and in our daily Opinion newsletter. To respond to a column, submit a comment to

June 4, 2019

As LGBT Boomers Grow Old

Image result for lgbt retirement
First retirenment home for LGBT in Sweeden

JoNel Aleccia and Melissa Bailey, The Washington Post

Two years ago, nursing professor Kim Acquaviva asked a group of home-care nurses whether they thought she was going to hell for being a lesbian. It's OK if you do, Acquaviva said, but is the afterlife within your scope of practice?

After Acquaviva's talk, an older nurse announced she would change how she treats LGBT people under her care. 

"I still think you're going to hell, but I'm going to stop telling patients that," the nurse told Acquaviva.
Acquaviva, a professor at George Washington University School of Nursing in Washington, raised the example at a panel hosted by Kaiser Health News on inclusive care for LGBT seniors. It was one of many examples of discrimination that these older adults may face as they seek medical care.

LGBT baby boomers, dubbed "the Stonewall Generation," came of age just as the 1969 New York uprising galvanized a push for gay rights. After living through an era of unprecedented social change, they're facing new challenges as they grow old.

"Fifty years after Stonewall, there's a new generation of LGBT elders who never thought they'd get an AARP card," said Nii-Quartelai-Quartey, AARP's senior adviser and national liaison on the issue who also participated in the panel.

By 2030, there will be an estimated 7 million LGBT people in the United States over 50. About 4.7 million of them will need elder care and services, according to SAGE, an advocacy group.
In a country where most elder care is left to family, many LGBT people are estranged from relatives and don't have that option. Turning to others for care - in assisted-living centers, nursing homes or hospice settings - makes them uniquely vulnerable.

"The fear of living in a situation where they can't advocate for their own care and safety is terrifying," said Hilary Meyer, chief enterprise and innovation officer for SAGE.

Three-quarters of LGBT people are worried about having adequate family or social supports, according to a nationally representative survey of AARP members released last year.
More than a third said they are concerned that they'll have to hide their identity to find suitable housing as they age. And at least 60 percent are concerned about neglect, harassment, and abuse, the survey showed.

Often, those fears are founded, according to results of a forthcoming survey of more than 850 hospice and palliative care providers about LGBT patients and family experiences.
"I think the information we've got is actually quite discouraging and quite concerning," said Gary Stein, a professor at the Wurzweiler School of Social Work at Yeshiva University who co-led the project.

Most providers surveyed said LGBT people received discriminatory care, he said. For transgender patients, two-thirds said that was true.

Caregivers reported hundreds of examples of disrespectful treatment, Stein said.
When LGBT couples would hold hands, staff "might roll their eyes, make faces at each other," he said. They often failed to consult the patients' partners, directing questions to biological family members instead.

In several instances, staff would "try to pray" to the patient or their family, Stein said.
Some LGBT patients were left in soiled diapers or rationed pain medication in a "punishing way" because of their sexual identity, he added.

"For transgender patients, there was lots of discomfort around what to call the person," Stein said. "A number of people said patients were called 'it' instead of a pronoun."
Twenty states have laws that specifically protect LGBT people against discrimination, but most don't, Stein noted. A recently enacted Trump administration "conscience rule" allows providers to decline to provide care that goes against their moral or spiritual beliefs. Advocates said the new rule could make it easier to discriminate against LGBT people.

Still, a growing number of senior housing and care sites are putting nondiscrimination policies in place and training personnel to provide LGBT-inclusive care.
The SAGE staff has trained more than 50,000 people at more than 300 sites nationwide, Meyer said. They learn best practices for asking questions that don't perpetuate stigma.

"It's even something as simple as asking somebody, a woman if her husband will be visiting," said Meyer, noting that the question forces the person to decide whether to announce her sexual identity. "Having to come out of the closet that way can be very challenging."

In a few high-profile instances, LGBT couples or individuals have sued providers for discrimination.
In 2016, Lambda Legal, a gay advocacy group, sued an Illinois senior residential facility for failing to protect Marsha Wetzel, 70, a disabled lesbian, from harassment and violence by other residents. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruled that a landlord may be held liable under the Fair Housing Act for failing to protect a tenant from known discriminatory harassment by other tenants.
Karen Loewy, Wetzel's attorney, would say only that "the matter has been resolved," and Wetzel is now living at a Chicago-area facility.

Last summer, in Missouri, a married lesbian couple, Mary Walsh, 73, and Bev Nance, 69, sued a senior-living facility that denied their housing application. The Friendship Village assisted-living center cited a "cohabitation policy" that defines marriage as between one man and one woman as the reason.

A U.S. district judge dismissed the lawsuit in January, saying that their claims of discrimination were "based on sexual orientation rather than sex alone." The distinction is important because neither federal nor state laws explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation. The lawsuit was stayed pending Supreme Court decisions that could affect the outcome.

In the meantime, the couple has remained in their single-family home, where Walsh has developed health problems, said their attorney, Julie Wilensky of the National Center for Lesbian Rights.
"They wanted to be planning in advance so that they would have stability when issues might come up in the future," Wilensky said.
Not every LGBT person will want to step forward in the way Wetzel, Walsh, and Nance have, Loewy, said.

"When you feel like you're being denied care . . . you may not want to be out there to wave the banner," she said.
Finding an LGBT-tolerant facility can be difficult. People are often bound by geography, and options are limited.

Still, LGBT people and their families can - and should - have candid conversations with potential caregivers before they make a choice, Loewy said.

One key question: Ask what kind of experience staff have working with LGBT people.
"If they say they haven't [treated any such patients], don't believe them," Loewy said. "You want to hear a really clear commitment to ensuring every resident of this facility is going to be treated with dignity."
- - -
This report was produced by Kaiser Health News, a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation that is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

July 24, 2018

Trump Wants Regulatory Changes to Make it More Difficult for LGBT to Obtain Medical Help

The Trump administration is considering regulatory changes that would worsen barriers many lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in the United States face in obtaining health care, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) should reconsider those changes, which would leave LGBT people more vulnerable to discrimination.

The 34-page report, “‘You Don’t Want Second Best’: Anti-LGBT Discrimination in US Health Care,” documents some of the obstacles that LGBT people face when seeking mental and physical health care services. Many LGBT people are unable to find services in their area, encounter discrimination or refusals of service in healthcare settings, or delay or forego care because of concerns of mistreatment.

“Discrimination puts LGBT people at heightened risk for a range of health issues, from depression and addiction to cancer and chronic conditions,” said Ryan Thoreson, an LGBT rights researcher at Human Rights Watch. “Instead of treating those disparities as a public health issue, HHS is developing politicized rules that will make them much worse.”

Two upcoming regulatory changes are likely to worsen these barriers, Human Rights Watch said. In January 2018, HHS issued a proposed rule that would broaden existing religious exemptions in health care law, giving sweeping discretion to insurers and providers to deny service to patients because of their moral or religious beliefs. In April 2018, the Trump administration announced plans to roll back a regulation that clarifies that federal law prohibits health care discrimination based on gender identity. If finalized, these changes would further undermine the limited antidiscrimination protections that currently exist for LGBT people.

Human Rights Watch interviewed 81 people for the report, including providers and individuals who said they had experienced discrimination in healthcare settings.

July 23, 2018 Report
“You Don’t Want Second Best”
Anti-LGBT Discrimination in US Health Care
Existing protections for LGBT people in health care are uneven. In 2016, the Obama administration issued a regulation clarifying that Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits sex discrimination in health care, also prohibits discrimination against transgender people. Eight states and religious health care providers challenged the regulation in court, and the Trump administration has signaled it plans to roll it back.

Protections at the state level are lacking. As of July 2018, 37 states do not expressly ban health insurance discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. New Jersey prohibits discrimination based on gender identity but not sexual orientation. In 10 US states, transition-related health care is expressly excluded from Medicaid coverage, limiting options for low-income transgender people.

LGBT people interviewed for the report described difficulty finding hormone replacement therapy, HIV prevention and treatment options, fertility and reproductive services, and even just welcoming primary care services. Judith N., a transgender woman in East Tennessee, said, “I spent years looking for access to therapy and hormones and I just couldn’t find it.”

Others described discriminatory treatment by providers. Trevor L., a gay man in Memphis, recalled an incident when he took an HIV test at his annual checkup in 2016: “and they sat down and started preaching to me – not biblical things, but saying, you know this is not appropriate, I can help you with counseling, and I was like, oh, thank you, I’ve been out for 20 years and I think I’m okay. It’s almost like they feel they have the right to tell you that it’s wrong.”

In addition to discrimination, many LGBT people are refused services outright because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. In a nationally representative survey conducted by the Center for American Progress in 2017, 8 percent of lesbian, gay, and bisexual respondents and 29 percent of transgender respondents reported that a healthcare provider had refused to see them because of their sexual orientation or gender identity in the past year. Interviewees described being denied counseling and therapy, refused fertility treatments, denied a checkup or other primary care services, and in one instance, told that a pediatrician’s religious beliefs precluded her from evaluating a same-sex couple’s 6-day-old child.

Both providers and LGBT people noted that concerns about discrimination and mistreatment led LGBT people to delay or forego care. A 2015 survey of almost 28,000 transgender people found that, in the year preceding the survey, 23 percent did not seek care they needed because of concern about mistreatment based on gender identity.

Many interviewees expressed concern that laws permitting providers to refuse service on moral or religious grounds would make care even harder to obtain. Persephone Webb, a transgender activist in Knoxville, Tennessee, said that “[i]t tells people who are prone to being bigoted to be a little braver, and a little braver. And we see through this – we know this is an attack on LGBT people.”

Instead of finalizing the proposed changes, HHS should preserve antidiscrimination protections and withdraw sweeping exemptions that put patients at risk, Human Rights Watch said. Lawmakers at the state and federal level should prohibit discrimination in health care on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity and should repeal exemptions that allow providers to refuse to serve patients because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

“When LGBT people seek medical care, the oath to do no harm too often gives way to judgment and discrimination,” Thoreson said. “Lawmakers need to make clear that patients come first, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.”

March 20, 2018

LGBT Inclusive Hospice Care

Cover of
Cover of "LGBTQ-Inclusive Hospice and Palliative Care "
Discrimination against LGBT people is unacceptable in any instance. But it is particularly unforgiveable when encountered in a hospice or palliative care environment.
When an LGBT person has a serious or life-limiting illness and seeks palliative care or hospice care, they run the risk of isolation and marginalization at the precise time when they most need support. LGBT family members of straight patients seeking hospice care are also vulnerable.
A 2016 survey quoted in The Atlantic article “LGBT Seniors Are Being Pushed Back Into the Closet” by David R. Wheeler,” found that LGBT seniors were frequently mistreated by care-center staff. Abuse  included cases of verbal and physical harassment and refusal of basic services. Some respondents reported being prayed for and warned they might ‘go to hell’ for their sexual orientation or gender identity.” Stripped of any sense of comfort while facing a serious illness some find their situation all the more excruciating. LGBT adults who’ve already experienced a lifetime of discrimination may be particularly vulnerable as they seek out care.
When seeking LGBT-inclusive hospice and palliative care for ourselves or a loved one, it is critically important to know what to look for. In the handbook for hospice and palliative care professionals, LGBTQ-Inclusive Hospice and Palliative Care by Kimberly D. Acquaviva (Harrington Park Press) offers guidelines that translate easily into advice for those seeking palliative and end-of-life care. It is the Book of the Year for Palliative Care and Hospice category from the American Journal of Nursing.
Beyond sensitivity training in caring for LGBT patients, the handbook reiterates the broader tenet of never assuming anything about patients, family members, colleagues, or employees. Never assume the gender a person identifies as or the pronouns they want used to refer to themselves. Never make assumptions about how a person wants to be addressed, never assume that an LGBT person’s family either rejects or embraces theim and never assume anything regarding spirituality.
The handbook discusses how to conduct an inclusive “intake interview” and how to understand complex family dynamics. It offers guidance on topics that may not be as obvious, but are equally critical, such as whether or not an LGBT healthcare professional should disclose their gender identity and/or sexual orientation in an effort to bond with the patient. Professionals need to be mindful of not inadvertently “outing” patients whose sex anatomy and gender identity do not match by using their preferred gender pronouns, and making sure patients’ wishes are legally protected with a healthcare power of attorney.
For those searching for a hospice or palliative care organization, one of the most important things to look for is a prominently displayed, LGBT-inclusive, nondiscrimination statement.
The statement should, at minimum, include the phrases “gender identity” and “sexual orientation,” in addition to the other phrases that commonly appear in nondiscrimination statements. The statement should appear on the organization’s website homepage — not buried on some other page and be included in any printed marketing materials.
Type the terms “LGBT,” LGBTQ,” “gay,” “lesbian,” “bisexual,” “transgender,” “discrimination,” “gender identity,”  gender expression,” or “sexual orientation” into any search boxes embedded on the organization’s homepage. It should yield a link to the nondiscrimination statement.
In order for a hospice or palliative care employees also feel safe, comfortable, and valued. Look at the organization’s non-discrimination statement to make sure it protects LGBT employees. Also, look for staff diversity that don’t appear awkward, forced, or worse, stock photos of crayon-box lineups. Ads in LGBT newspapers and websites, an information booth at a local LGBT Pride festival, and availability of an LGBT bereavement group is ideal.
There’s an easy way to assess how inclusive a hospice or palliative care program really is: If you visit the program’s offices just look for gender-neutral bathrooms. A willingness to address the needs of ALL people by installing gender-neutral bathrooms is a pretty good indication of its commitment to LGBT inclusivity.
LGBTQ-Inclusive Hospice and Palliative Care is published by Harrington Park Press, and distributed by Columbia University Press.

It is adamfoxie's 10th🦊Anniversay. 10 years witnessing the world and bringing you a pieace whcih is ussually not getting its due coverage.

January 19, 2018

Trump"s Conscience Law Will Allow Medical Personnel from Attending to Gays


 No abortions for you hnoey but you can have the cross of Christ and his love for people like me

Health care workers who want to refuse to treat patients because of religious or moral beliefs will have a new defender in the Trump administration.

The top civil rights official at the Department of Health and Human Services is creating the Division of Conscience and Religious Freedom to protect doctors, nurses and other health care workers who refuse to take part in procedures like abortion or treat certain people because of moral or religious objections.

"Never forget that religious freedom is a primary freedom, that it is a civil right that deserves enforcement and respect," said Roger Severino, the director of HHS's Office for Civil Rights, at a ceremony to announce the new division.

The establishment of the division reverses an Obama-era policy that barred health care workers from refusing to treat transgender individuals or people who have had or are seeking abortions.

That Obama rule was challenged in court by the Franciscan Alliance, a Christian health care organization in Texas, and a judge in 2016 blocked enforcement as the case played out in court.

The new division appears to be primarily aimed at preventing health care workers from participating in abortion services that go against their religious beliefs. The division cites a 2011 federal regulation guiding the enforcement of conscience protections that mentions abortion more than 30 times.
Louise Melling, deputy legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said those conscience objections could expand to allow health workers to refuse some services to gay, lesbian and transgender people.

"This administration has taken a very expansive view of religious liberty," she said in an interview. "It understands religious liberty to override antidiscrimination principles."

HHS makes clear that it won't allow gender discrimination that is banned by federal law. The question, according to Melling, is whether the administration includes gender identity and sexual orientation in the definition of gender.

She says there are many examples of health workers refusing care on religious grounds, including a nurse who didn't want to provide post-operative care to a woman who had an abortion, a pediatrician who declined to see a child because his parents were lesbians and a fertility doctor who didn't want to provide services to a lesbian couple.

Acting HHS Secretary Eric Hargan said Thursday that is the point.

"For too long too many of these health care practitioners have been bullied and discriminated against because of their religious beliefs and moral conviction," he said.

The government, he said, has "hounded religious hospitals and the men and women who staff them, forcing them to provide and refer for services that violate their consciences."

The new division won't have to wait to get to work. A pediatric nurse at the Winnebago County Health Department in Illinois filed a complaint with HHS on Tuesday because she objects to her employer requiring that she be trained to make referrals to providers of abortion services or to help woman get abortion drugs, according to the Rockford Register Star.

This isn't the first time in the Trump administration that HHS's Office of Civil Rights has moved to protect people with moral or religious objections to some kinds of health care. In October, the agency allowed employers to refuse to pay for birth control coverage.

"Health providers should have the ability to live their religious beliefs without fear of workplace discrimination," said Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., in a statement.

Lankford has long advocated for such protections and has sponsored a bill called the Conscience Protection Act to codify the rules.

HHS head Roger Semerino (Former Director, DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society, Institute for Family, Community, and Opportunity)

The media spends a lot of time tracking Donald Trump’s every move and chasing down members of Congress, but much of governing happens in these bland halls. Under Trump, HHS may see more changes than any other agency, in part because the president’s predecessor left his biggest mark here. As Congress stalls on passing a new health-care bill, the Trump administration can still fight Obamacare with revised regulations, rejiggered budgets, and lackluster enforcement. 

December 22, 2017

Report Highlights Dangers of Religious Exemption Laws for LGBT Elders

 Everybody Ages and some days are longer for some than for others


[NEW YORK, NY] The Movement Advancement Project (MAP), the Public Rights/Private Conscience Project (PRPCP) at Columbia Law School, and SAGE, the nation’s largest and oldest organization dedicated to improving the lives of LGBT elders, released a new report, Dignity Denied: Religious Exemptions and LGBT Elder ServicesTo download the report, visit
The report highlights the unique ways in which lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) elders are harmed by a growing number of laws and policies aimed at exempting religious organizations and individuals from following nondiscrimination and civil rights laws and policies.
By 2050, the number of people older than 65 will double to 83.7 million, and there are currently more than 2.7 million LGBT adults who are 50 years or older living across the country. LGBT elders face unique challenges to successful aging stemming from current and past structural and legal discrimination because of their sexual orientation, their gender identity, their age, and other factors like race. These risk factors are exacerbated by recent efforts at the local, state, and federal levels to allow those with religious or moral objections to be exempt from nondiscrimination laws, leaving LGBT older adults vulnerable to increased risk for discrimination and mistreatment.
According to the report released by MAP, PRPCP at Columbia Law School, and SAGE, religiously affiliated organizations provide a majority of the services LGBT elders rely on for their most basic needs. LGBT older adults, like many older Americans in the United States, access a network of service providers for health care, community programming and congregate meals, food and income assistance, and housing, ranging from independent living to skilled in-home nursing. Approximately 85% of nonprofit continuing-care retirement communities are affiliated with a religion. Religiously affiliated facilities also provide the greatest number of affordable housing units that serve low-income seniors. Finally, 14% of hospitals in the United States are religiously affiliated, accounting for 17% of all the country’s hospital beds.
While many of these facilities provide quality care for millions of older adults, there exists a coordinated nationwide effort to pass religious exemption laws and policies, and file lawsuits that would allow individuals, businesses, and even government contractors and grantees to use religion as a basis for discriminating against a range of communities, including LGBT elders.
Dignity Denied: Religious Exemptions and LGBT Elder Services outlines myriad federal and state efforts to allow individuals, businesses, and organizations to opt out of following nondiscrimination laws as long as they cite a religious objection. While most providers will do the right thing when it comes to serving their clients, some will only do so when required by law. The report concludes that because so many service providers are religiously affiliated, these laws pose a considerable threat to the health and well-being of LGBT older adults.
In conjunction with the release of the report, a panel discussion was held on Friday, December 15, at Union Theological Seminary at Columbia University featuring speakers from Center for Faith and Community Partnerships, The LGBT & HIV Project, American Civil Liberties Union, The Movement Advancement Project, The New Jewish Home, New York City Commission on Human Rights, Public Rights/Private Conscience Project, Columbia Law School, the Union Theological Seminary, and SAGE.
“This report and the amicus brief SAGE filed in the Masterpiece Cake case clearly demonstrate that personal religious beliefs should never be a license to discriminate against LGBT people or anybody else,” said Michael Adams, CEO of SAGE. “That’s why we are bringing together aging experts, religious leaders, and our elders to expose the dangers that so-called religious exemptions pose for LGBT elders who need care and services. We must not allow the door of a nursing home or other critical care provider to slam in LGBT elders’ faces just because of who they are or who they love.”
“This important report reveals the many ways in which the privatization of elder services, largely to conservative religiously affiliated providers, leaves LGBT older adults no choice but to obtain care in facilities that do not welcome them,” said Katherine Franke, Sulzbacher Professor of Law, Gender and Sexuality Studies, and Faculty Director of PRPCP at Columbia University. “The many LGBT elders who are adherents of faith-based traditions themselves suffer a special indignity when they are forced to seek care in settings that deny the dignity of both their LGBT identity and their faith-based beliefs.”
“LGBT older adults already are more likely to be isolated and vulnerable. It is unconscionable that state and federal governments are working to allow providers to deny critical health care services and vital social supports to LGBT older adults simply because of who they are,” said Ineke Mushovic, executive director of the Movement Advancement Project. “Imagine how much harder it would be to reach out for help if you knew the organizations that were supposed to help you could legally reject you, and the government would back them up.”
The Movement Advancement Project (MAP) is an independent think tank that provides rigorous research, insight, and analysis that help speed equality for LGBT people. MAP works collaboratively with LGBT organizations, advocates and funders, providing information, analysis and resources that help coordinate and strengthen efforts for maximum impact. MAP’s policy research informs the public and policymakers about the legal and policy needs of LGBT people and their families.  Learn more at
PRPCP at Columbia Law School’s mission is to bring legal academic expertise to bear on the multiple contexts in which religious liberty rights conflict with or undermine other fundamental rights to equality and liberty. We undertake approaches to the developing law of religion that both respects the importance of religious liberty and recognizes the ways in which too broad an accommodation of these rights threatens Establishment Clause violations and can unsettle a proper balance with other competing fundamental rights. Our work takes the form of legal research and scholarship, public policy interventions, advocacy support, and academic and media publications.
SAGE is the country's largest and oldest organization dedicated to improving the lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) older adults. Founded in 1978 and headquartered in New York City, SAGE is a national organization that offers supportive services and consumer resources to LGBT older adults and their caregivers, advocates for public policy changes that address the needs of LGBT older people, provides education and technical assistance for aging providers and LGBT organizations through its National Resource Center on LGBT Aging, and cultural competence training through SAGECare. Headquartered in New York City, with staff across the country, SAGE also coordinates a growing network of affiliates in the United States. Learn more at

Featured Posts

Former Michigan U Dr. Now Being Investigated For Sexual Assaults on The Physician Team

Kim Kozlowski , The Detroit News Palm Springs, California  —  The University of Michigan is investigating several "dist...