Showing posts with label War Veterans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label War Veterans. Show all posts

May 26, 2016

Trump NEVER Made $One Mil Donation to Vets-How we all found out


Image result for trump question mark
                                                                          











Going back to verify a politicians story requires lots of time and time is money. That is the reason that politicians like Trump and others make all kinds of claims banking precisely on that. It seems Trump depends on that situation more often than not given the amount of claims he latter does not remember or recants “I never said that” “ I don’t even know who_______is?”” I didn’t post that picture” “He did it first (posting pic)”        These are all recent posts so you can remember them or better yet, track them down.                                                              

On Tuesday, WaPo's Dave Fahrenthold got to the bottom of one of the big mysteries of Donald Trump's presidential campaign: Did he really raise and donate $6 million — including $1 million of his own money — to veterans' organizations as he had boasted for months?  I was fascinated by how Fahrenthold harnessed the power of social media to finally pin down Trump and get some answers. I reached out to Dave to pick his brain about why the story initially interested him and how and when he decided to take his reporting to Twitter. Our conversation, conducted via email and edited only for grammar, is below.
Explain your thought process when you decided to take on the Trump veterans donation claim. What drew you to it?
I’d seen Trump give away oversized checks to vets’ groups in Iowa — and then stop giving them away in New Hampshire, with much of the money still unaccounted for. I decided to see if I could find out what happened to the rest of it. I liked this story idea because it was so concrete. There was no need for speculation: “Could Trump really build the wall? Experts say …”). There was a specific claim — Trump had raised $6 million, and he was giving it away. And there were people outside Trump’s campaign (the vets’ charities) who could say whether that claim was actually coming true.
I started this as a side project in February, making a few calls to the charities Trump had listed as recipients. At that point, I figured it would most likely be a wild goose chase. I’d find out that the charities had all already received big donations from Trump, and that would be that. Because who stiffs military veterans in the middle of a presidential campaign? 
But then, the first ones I called said they hadn’t actually received anything yet from Trump. That got me started on what’s now been a few months of reporting. 
You used Twitter to report the story out. Why? And what was the result?
By this week, I thought I had a good handle on one part of this story: what became of the donations that other donors gave to Trump’s effort. We knew that at least $4.5 million had been raised, and $3.1 million had been given away so far. The piece that was missing was the $1 million that Trump said he’d given himself. His campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, told me Trump had given the money away. But to who? Lewandowski wouldn’t say.  
I had doubts: Would Donald Trump, of all people, really give away $1 million in secret?
But that left me trying to prove a negative. I could try to call every veterans’ charity in the U.S. and ask them all individually if they’d received money from Trump. But even if I reached 1,000 charities, what if Trump had given his money to number 1,001?
I decided to make my search public, using Twitter to reach out to prominent veterans’ groups, vets advocates and news sites aimed at veterans and active-duty military. I asked whether any of them had received even $1 from Trump’s supposed million-dollar gift. I used Trump’s Twitter handle in my queries so they would show up in Trump’s own mentions. I wanted Trump to feel scrutiny on his preferred social-media platform in the hope that he would reach out to answer the question himself. Apparently, he noticed. That night, Trump sent several tweets attacking the media for its coverage of his fundraiser. And — at some point that evening — he actually made a call and gave his $1 million gift, almost four months late.
Amazingly, with all of the money I have raised for the vets, I have got nothing but bad publicity from the dishonest and disgusting media.
When did you realize that Trump hadn’t actually made the donation he said he made?
Not until Trump called me on Tuesday afternoon to say he’d just given the whole million at once. Until then, I hadn’t found proof of any gift of personal cash from Trump to a vets’ group. But of course, I also hadn’t been able to prove the negative: that such a gift definitely didn’t exist.
How did you get Trump on the phone? At what point in the story did it happen?
We had put in a request to talk with Trump on Tuesday, after he’d sent out those tweets and an Instagram message criticizing our reporting. But to be honest, I didn’t think he would call: In the past, my questions about the vets fundraising have been answered by Trump’s staffers, not the candidate himself.
But then, about 5 p.m., he did call from his plane. We had to scrap our old plan for that day’s story, which had been mainly focused on Trump’s attacks on the media. After I got off the phone with Trump, I called the foundation he’d given to and got confirmation that the $1 million had truly been promised to them. Then we quickly wrote up a story for the Web.
This was a story you used social media to execute. What’s been the response on Twitter and the like once the story landed?
I was really grateful that many other reporters – including many who don’t even cover politics – retweeted my queries seeking answers about Trump’s $1 million on Monday. I’m not much of a social-media expert, and my Twitter following is pretty measly. I got a lot of help from Post colleagues with bigger followings, of course. But I also got a huge boost from people like Matt Pearce at the L.A. Times and Sopan Deb at CBS (whom I offered to buy dinner if he could find me somebody who got Trump’s money). They amplified my questions, helped me reach a far larger audience than I could have on my own. It was wonderful to get that kind of vital help from people who are theoretically my competitors.
Since the story landed, the reception has been incredibly gracious. And I am glad that I don’t have to buy Sopan dinner after all.

November 19, 2014

When You send Your sons Daughters to Fight for Oil this is what what too often comes back




These pictures of wounded UK armed forces personnel were taken by Bryan Adams, the Canadian rock musician who is also a celebrated portrait photographer.
Four years worth of photos are published in a new book, Wounded: The Legacy of War, Photographs by Bryan Adams, and at an accompanying exhibition at Somerset House in London.

I just thought I should try and be as honest with them as possible, because they were being honest with me.
  • Bryan Adams, on being asked whether he felt the weight of responsibility in capturing traumatic personal narratives

Bryan Adams
Marine Mark Ormrod, injured in Afghanistan, aged 24

Bryan Adams
Private Alex Stringer, injured in Afghanistan, aged 20

Bryan Adams
Private Karl Hinett, injured in Iraq, aged 18

Bryan Adams
Sergeant Rick Clement, injured in Afghanistan, aged 30

Bryan Adams
Private Jaco Van Gass, injured in Afghanistan, aged 23

Bryan Adams
Private Jaco Van Gass, injured in Afghanistan, aged 23

Bryan Adams
Corporal Simon Brown, injured in Iraq, aged 28

Bryan Adams
Rifleman Craig Wood, injured in Afghanistan, aged 18

Bryan Adams
Corporal RickyFergusson, injured in Afghanistan, aged 24

Bryan Adams
Sergeant Rick Clement, injured in Afghanistan, aged 30

Bryan Adams
Lieutenant Will Dixon, injured in Afghanistan, aged 25

Bryan Adams
Sergeant Mark Sutcliffe, injured in Iraq, aged 27

Bryan Adams
Corporal Rory Mackenzie, injured in Iraq, aged 25

Bryan Adams
Marine Joe Townsend, injured in Afghanistan, aged 19

(All pictures courtesy of Bryan Adams)

Read more about the photographs here.

February 3, 2014

Hawaii Democrat Introduces Bill to Help Gay Vets



 
A Hawaii Democrat introduced on Thursday new legislation in the U.S. Senate that would ensure gay veterans discharged because of their sexual orientation have the designation of “honorable” discharge on their records.
The bill, known as the Restore Honor to Service Members Act, would apply to gay veterans who were in service prior to the lifting of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in 2011, when the U.S. military expelled troops for being openly gay.
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), the chief sponsor, said “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal was “a watershed moment,” but his bill would address remaining issues for the estimated 114,000 service members expelled because of their sexual orientation since World War II.
“Yet thousands of former service members still bear the scars of that discrimination, with their military records tarnished with discharges other than honorable and marks on their records that compromise their right to privacy,” Schatz said. “Many of these brave men and women that served our country are currently barred from benefits that they earned and are entitled to, and in the most egregious cases they are prevented from legally calling themselves a veteran. This needs to be corrected now.”
Although many service members were given an “honorable” discharge from the military if they were expelled because of their sexual orientation, others were given “other than honorable,” “general discharge” or “dishonorable” discharge.
As a consequence, these former troops may be disqualified from accessing certain benefits, such as GI bill tuition assistance and veterans’ health care, and may not be able to claim veteran status. In some cases, they may be prevented from voting or have difficulty acquiring civilian employment.
Even troops who received “honorable” discharges may have difficulties in the aftermath of their service because their sexual orientation may be identified as the reason for the discharge.
Although an administrative process already exists for service members to change their records, the proposed legislation would streamline the process to ensure these designations don’t impair former members of the armed forces.
Joining Schatz in introducing the legislation is Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), who said allowing service members to change their discharges if they were expelled because of their sexual orientation demands immediate attention.
“A clean, honorable record is long overdue for veterans who were discharged solely because of who they love,” Gillibrand said. “Our veterans served our country courageously and with dignity and we must act to give them the appropriate recognition they deserve.”
The legislation has 17 co-sponsors — all Democrats. They are Mark Udall (D-Colo.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawai‘i), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Mark Begich (D-Alaska), Gillibrand, Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.).
Denny Meyer, national public affairs officer for the LGBT group known as American Veterans for Equal Rights, said her organization supports the bill.
“LGBT veterans who served and sacrificed in silence during World War II, Korea, and Vietnam, as well as those who served before and during ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’ in the Gulf War, Iraq, and Afghanistan, deserve to see their service recognized and honored at long last,” Meyer said. “We endorse and support the efforts by Senators Schatz and Gillibrand and Congressmen Pocan and Rangel to move forward the Restoring Honor to Our Service Members Act, which will accelerate discharge upgrades.”
In joint statement, gay Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) and Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), who are taking the lead on the legislation in the House, commended the senators for introducing the Senate companion.
“This bill would close the book on “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” and provide tens of thousands of gay veterans, who selflessly risked their lives for our nation,” Pocan and Rangel said. “Our bill already has the support of more than 140 House members, and we look forward to working with Senators Schatz and Gillibrand to ensure it can pass Congress and get to the President’s desk.”
Upon the introduction of the bill in July 2013, Rangel said during a conference call with Pocan he wants the White House and the Pentagon to support the legislation.
“We’re hoping we get this involved in the Department of Defense,” Rangel said at the time. “We hope, too — we haven’t talked about it, Mark — but there’s no question we’re looking to get White House support as well.”
Seven months later at the time of Senate introduction, the White House still hasn’t spoken out. The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request to comment on the bill.

November 11, 2013

The Military Reaches Out to Gay Vets through Veteran Affairs


                                                                               




The federal government is reaching out around the nation to gay and lesbian military veterans - most of whom had to spend their military careers in the closet - in its most concerted effort yet to let them know its doors are open to them.
Under a pilot program that began Oct. 1 in six metropolitan areas, including the Bay Area, the Department of Veterans Affairs has dispatched teams of psychologists to community meetings and brought in trainers to work with VA employees. The training deals with everything from how to appropriately ask about relationship status to being more alert about detecting post-traumatic stress caused by antigay discrimination.
The goal, said VA psychologist Stephen Rao, who is helping to oversee the effort in San Francisco, is to "really branch out to the LGBT community, to let them know we are a safe place for them."
So far, Rao's team has run information tables at a half-dozen events in the city and conducted a number of sensitivity seminars for VA staff.
"We're getting several new clients a week coming in, and we anticipate that will really grow in the coming months," Rao said. "The VA is blazing a trail. ... We are all very excited about this."
A starvation-thin, middle-aged gay Army veteran who went only by George notched himself a little place in military history last month in San Francisco because of the outreach program, without even knowing it.
At the nation's first Project Homeless Connect event held specifically for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people, George gingerly approached a table at the LGBT Community Center marked "Veterans Services" and asked, "Are you for real?"
Rao's answer was a welcoming laugh.
"I mean, really, it wasn't that long ago you guys threw us out for being gay, right?" George pressed on.
"Yes, we're real, and no, we weren't throwing people out of veteran hospitals for being gay," Rao explained. Then he held out a brochure of VA medical services - and with that, George became the first homeless gay man to be drawn in by the new outreach effort.
San Francisco's VA operations already had well-established open-door policies toward LGBT people before the national effort began. But even here - as George's query demonstrated - some people can still use some convincing.
It's all part of a new era for all things military, gay and lesbian in the United States.
Just two years ago, the military was tossing people out for being gay or lesbian. Transgender people are still barred from the services, but all other sexual orientations became accepted with the end of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy in 2011 - and the transformation has constituted a rapid deployment of sensitivity.
Now there are public support organizations such as OutServe-SLDN for gays and lesbians who are still in the military, and dozens of veterans have had dishonorable discharges changed to honorable. The VA, being a separate department from the active forces, hasn't barred gays and lesbians from receiving care for many years, but the repeal of the ban on gays in the services has prompted it to expand its outreach.
The VA maintains a national crisis phone line for gay and lesbian veterans and a website offering advice on specialized care, including a section detailing benefits that is titled, "I am a Lesbian, Gay or Bisexual Veteran." Over the past two years it also began offering hormone therapy and specialized counseling for transgender people, despite their continued exclusion from the military.
In September, President Obama ordered the VA to give same-sex spouses of veterans the same access to federal benefits as straight spouses - an outgrowth of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down the Defense of Marriage Act. 
The VA estimates that about 1 million of the nation's 21 million veterans are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. Considering that theVeterans Health Administration runs the biggest integrated health system in the world, "it is likely the largest single provider of health care for sexual and gender minority individuals in the United States," the agency's LGBT program coordinator, Jillian Shipherd, wrote in a June issue of the research journal LGBT Health.
"It's incredibly important that we get the word out that veterans are welcome at the VA no matter what their sexual identity is," Shipherd said in an interview. "We have always provided good care for LGBT veterans, but we are now formalizing our policies and procedures in ways we haven't before."
Discrimination is at the root of many of the problems specific to gay and lesbian veterans, Shipherd and Rao said. VA research shows that the strain from being stigmatized and the target of bigoted hostility can produce higher rates of smoking, alcohol and drug abuse in LGBT vets, as well as a greater risk of anxiety and depression.
"A lot of the LGBT patients I see have experienced severe post-traumatic stress disorder because of discrimination, and how one makes sense of that kind of PTSD is different from having had a mortar explode next to you," Shipherd said. "You need to be sensitive to that as a provider."
LGBT vets also are at greater risk for sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV and some cancers.

Putting people at ease

Putting a patient at ease while handling these challenges can involve anything from being extra-vigilant for certain conditions to simply not asking veterans if they have a "husband or wife."
"We tell people to instead ask in gender-neutral ways, such as asking if they have a partner," Rao said. "You want them to know you are sensitive to various kinds of relationships."
In addition to the Bay Area, the VA is making its push in Boston, Honolulu, Houston, Milwaukee and New Haven County, Conn. Next year, it will be extended to Chicago and San Diego.
For LGBT vets still barely used to the idea that their lifestyle is not conduct unbecoming, this new VA push is like fresh wind.
"It's tremendous," said John Caldera, 59, who kept his orientation secret enough to be honorably discharged as a Navy corpsman in 1987. "The most famous quote by Harvey Milk was, 'You gotta give 'em hope,' and this gives our vets more hope than ever."
He said that with society becoming more accepting of LGBT people, the VA should have an easier time connecting with younger vets.
"Bigotry, to some extent, is generational, and there were more good ol' boys in my generation than in this one," said Caldera, who serves on the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Commission. "I'd say the next big step for the military and even for vets is to reach out and include the transgender community.
“We've still got a long way to go."
 Kevin Fagan is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: kfagan@sfchronicle.com

September 14, 2013

This WW II at 95 Marries His Toy Boy At 67 a Viet Nam Vet


An elderly military couple married at their veterans home yesterday in the center's first gay ceremony.
95-year-old World War II veteran John Banvard, married his partner, 67-year-old Gerard Nadeau, who served in Vietnam.
The two have been together for 20 years, but had to wait until the recent Supreme Court decision to legally tie the knot. 
First kiss: John Banvard, left, and his partner Gerard Nadeau, right, got married yesterday at their veterans home in Chula Vista, California
First kiss: John Banvard, left, and his partner Gerard Nadeau, right, got married yesterday at their veterans home in Chula Vista, California

Peaceful day: Despite some residents expressing their disapproval with the union, there were no protests on the day of the wedding
Peaceful day: Despite some residents expressing their disapproval with the union, there were no protests on the day of the wedding
As for the residents who have complained to him about it: 'I told them, they have the right to get married here just like everybody else.'
But some residents still didn't like the idea. Someone even contacted the Westboro Baptist Church, a notoriously anti-gay  group in Florida, in hopes that they would get the ceremony moved off the property.

On the day of the wedding though, there were no protestors and those who objected to the ceremony simply didn't attend. 
'Oh that's they problem not mine,' Nadeau said about those opposed to the wedding. 'But you know what this will do? Open the door for other people.'
One resident said that while he disagreed with two men getting married he respected their legal right to do so.
'I just know that it's against my faith and my religion, but as Americans they have a right to do what they want to do.'
 
 Dailymail.co.uk

August 31, 2013

He criticized the Army on DADT on TV and got Kicked Out. Now Married He’s also dead at 36

 

Darren Manzella, a gay combat medic discharged from the Army after criticizing the military's `don't ask, don't tell' policy in a 2007 television interview, has died in a traffic accident in western New York. He was 36.
His aunt, Robin Mahoney, on Friday confirmed his death. Manzella lived in the Chautauqua County town of Portland; he and his partner were married in July.
The Monroe County Sheriff's Office said Manzella was driving on Interstate 490 in suburban Rochester about 8:30 p.m. on Thursday when his vehicle sideswiped a car.
Killed: Sergeant Darren Manzella, an openly gay active duty soldier back from Iraq, has died in a traffic accident in western New York. He was 36
Killed: Sergeant Darren Manzella, an openly gay active duty soldier back from Iraq, has died in a traffic accident in western New York. He was 36
Newlyweds: Darren Manzella and Javier Lapeira together on their wedding day last month
Newlyweds: Darren Manzella and Javier Lapeira together on their wedding day last month
Married: Darren Manzella (right) and his husband Javier Lapeira (left) would have celebrated their two-month wedding anniversary next week
Married: Darren Manzella (right) and his husband Javier Lapeira (left) would have celebrated their two-month wedding anniversary next week
Tragic accident: Deputies said he stopped his vehicle, got out and began pushing the car from behind. He was then hit by an SUV, pinning him between the two vehicles
Darren Manzella
Tragic accident: Deputies said he stopped his vehicle, got out and began pushing the car from behind. He was then hit by an SUV, pinning him between the two vehicles
Deputies said he stopped his vehicle, got out and began pushing the car from behind. He was then hit by an SUV, pinning him between the two vehicles. He died at the scene.
Manzella's December 2007 appearance on '60 Minutes' from the combat zone in Iraq was followed by his discharge in June 2008 for 'homosexual admission,' a violation of the since-rescinded policy prohibiting service members from openly acknowledging they are gay. 

After the television appearance and his return from Iraq, Manzella did media interviews, each a potential violation of the policy.
'This is who I am. This is my life,' Manzella said at a Washington news conference before his discharge. 'It has never affected my job performance before. I don't think it will make a difference now. And to be honest since then, I don't see a difference because of my homosexuality.'
Outspoken: In December 2007, Manzella told a 60 Minutes interviewer that he was gay, and had violated the 1993 policy that barred gay servicemen and women from disclosing their sexual orientation
Outspoken: In December 2007, Manzella told a 60 Minutes interviewer that he was gay, and had violated the 1993 policy that barred gay servicemen and women from disclosing their sexual orientation
Partner: Darren Manzella his husband Javiier Lapeira - when the army sergeant attempted to show officials he had violated policy he showed them pictures of a trip he and his boyfriend had taken
Partner: Darren Manzella his husband Javiier Lapeira - when the army sergeant attempted to show officials he had violated policy he showed them pictures of a trip he and his boyfriend had taken
In love: Darren Manzella (right) and Javier Lapeira (left) - Manzella was working at the Canandaigua V.A.¿s crisis call center, and married Javier Lapeira-Soto at a ceremony in Rochester on July 5
In love: Darren Manzella (right) and Javier Lapeira (left) - Manzella was working at the Canandaigua V.A.¿s crisis call center, and married Javier Lapeira-Soto at a ceremony in Rochester on July 5
Friend Anne Colwell Colangelo of Rome said she learned from relatives last night that the man she’d known since fourth grade had died.
Manzella moved to Rochester a few years ago after several years away, Ms. Colangelo said, 'which was awesome.'
Manzella was working at the Canandaigua V.A.’s crisis call center, and married Javier Lapeira-Soto at a ceremony in Rochester on July 5th.
He and his husband Javier Lapeira would have celebrated their two-month wedding anniversary next week.
'Last night, after finding out the news, his mother and father went right to Rochester to pick up his husband,' she said. 'Javier became their son the day they married.'
Common knowledge: Even when 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' was in effect, Darren Manzella was 'out' to his fellow soldiers, yet his superiors turned a blind eye to his sexual orientation
Common knowledge: Even when 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' was in effect, Darren Manzella was 'out' to his fellow soldiers, yet his superiors turned a blind eye to his sexual orientation
She said Manzella had recently joined the Army Reserves.
'Being in the military and serving was a very important part of his life,' she said. 'He was very proud to be a soldier.'
She and Manzella grew up side-by-side in tiny Brocton, Chautauqua County.
'He has lived so much life. He’s been around the world — so much experience he put into such a short time here. He really was a hero in so many ways.'
Manzella served in Iraq and Kuwait as an Army medic, earning a Combat Medical Badge for treating fellow soldiers while under fire in Baghdad. 
He was out to his Army buddies, but went to his commander after he began receiving anonymous emails warning him to 'turn the flame down.'
The officer reported Manzella in accordance with the military's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy. 
Man on a mission: Just weeks after coming 'out' to his fellow officers and superiors, Darren was send to Iraq
Man on a mission: Just weeks after coming 'out' to his fellow officers and superiors, Darren was send to Iraq
Manzella cooperated fully with the investigation that followed, Manzella, submitting photos of him and his boyfriend and video of a road trip they had taken together. 
But curiously, at the conclusion of their investigation, the Army told Manzella to return to work because 'proof of homosexuality' had not been found.
A month later, he was sent to Iraq.
His supporters said the overseas assignment demonstrated how the military was arbitrarily enforcing the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy during the war.
Manzella enlisted in the Army in 2002. He was awarded the Combat Medical Badge for service in Iraq. When he was discharged, he was a sergeant serving at Fort Hood with the 1st Cavalry Division

Featured Posts

Human Rights Campaign Testifies Against Judge Neil Gorsuch

LGBTQ groups have come out in strong opposition to the nomination of Neil Gorsuch as U.S. Supreme Court Justice, ar...