Showing posts with label Gay Marriage Final Tide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gay Marriage Final Tide. Show all posts

October 6, 2014

Supremes Take a Pass and thus Making Law and 30 Gay Marriages


The Supreme Court faced one of the biggest issues in its history Monday and turned its back.
Rather than decide the issue of same-sex marriage, as virtually everyone involved in the debate expected, the justices simply let stand lower-court rulings striking down bans in five states. Within hours, marriages were set to take place.
And the justices knew their decision to stay out of the grand national debate would have further repercussions: Within days or weeks, gay marriage could be legal in 30 states representing 60% of the U.S. population. Nine more states in the Midwest and West could be added very soon if appeals courts there join the juggernaut.
Why did the Supreme Court take a pass? Most likely because it lacked the votes to stop what federal and state court judges have started.
On the Republican ultra conservative justices they knew how to count. They have four the other side had 5. They took a pass which makes law the decisions by the appeals court, which the gay marriage issue has won in about 30 cases.

"The far more conservative justices couldn't count to five," said Jon Davidson of the gay rights group Lambda Legal. “They were not assured of a fifth vote, and so they didn’t want to grant review yet." 
The Supreme Court refused to get involved in the national debate over same-sex marriage Monday, leaving intact lower court rulings that will legalize the practice in 11 additional states.
The unexpected decision by the justices, announced without further explanation, immediately affects five states in which federal appeals courts had struck down bans against gay marriage: Virginia, Indiana, Wisconsin, Oklahoma and Utah.
It also will bring along six other states located in the judicial circuits overseen by those appellate courts: North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Colorado, Kansas and Wyoming. Lower court judges in those states must abide by their appeals court rulings. 
The action eventually will bring to 30 the number of states where gays and lesbians can marry. Appeals courts in Cincinnati and San Francisco are considering cases that could expand that number further, presuming the Supreme Court remains outside the legal fray.
"The court's letting stand these victories means that gay couples will soon share in the freedom to marry in 30 states, representing 60% of the American people," said Evan Wolfson, president of Freedom to Marry. "But we are one country, with one Constitution, and the court's delay in affirming the freedom to marry nationwide prolongs the patchwork of state-to-state discrimination and the harms and indignity that the denial of marriage still inflicts on too many couples in too many places."
Most court-watchers had predicted the justices would hear one or more cases this term and issue a verdict with nationwide implications by next June. But the justices, perhaps sensing that the country is headed toward legalizing gay marriage without their involvement, chose to deny states' appeals.

What happens now will occur in stages. The five states whose petitions were denied will have same-sex marriages almost immediately -- starting at 1 p.m. Monday in Virginia. In the other six, either attorneys general will clear the way or another court proceeding will be necessary.
Carol Schall, one of the plaintiffs in the Virginia case, was at work when she got an e-mail from colleagues saying the high court had denied the state's appeal. "Marriage legal," it said.
“My office mates heard a gasp from my office … only to see me in a puddle of tears," said Schall, who had sued to have her California marriage to Mary Townley recognized in Virginia, where they live. The number of states with legalized gay marriage could quickly expand to 35 states if the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denies bans in Idaho and Nevada, which could happen any day. That ruling would affect Alaska, Arizona and Montana as well.
Cases from Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee are pending before the 6th Circuit appeals court, which has been seen as a panel that could uphold bans in those states. If it goes the same way as the others, the list of states could expand to 39.
Opponents of same-sex marriage said they would not give up the fight, despite the court's decision. "Several federal courts ... still have cases working their way to the Supreme Court," said Byron Babione, senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom, which had defended the Oklahoma and Virginia bans. "The people should decide this issue, not the courts."
Nineteen states and the District of Columbia permit same-sex marriage, and the high court ruled last year that the federal government cannot deny benefits to such couples. It sidestepped the remaining state laws by taking no position on the merits of California's ban, which had been struck down by lower federal courts.
Since those decisions were handed down, six additional states have legalized gay marriage, and federal and state judges in at least 14 more states have overturned marriage bans, beginning with Utah last December. All those rulings had been put on hold during the appeals process, leaving 31 bans in place — until Monday. Any time same-sex couples are extended marriage equality is something to celebrate, and today is a joyous day for thousands of couples across America who will immediately feel the impact of today's Supreme Court action," said Chad Griffin, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay rights organization. "But ... the complex and discriminatory patchwork of marriage laws that was prolonged today by the Supreme Court is unsustainable. "The only acceptable solution is nationwide marriage equality."
The cases that had been under consideration included those from three federal appeals courts:
• A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled 2-1 in June and July that same-sex couples in Utah and Oklahoma have "the same fundamental right" to marry as heterosexuals.
• A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit ruled 2-1 in July that gay men and lesbians have a constitutional right to marry that is paramount to state marriage laws.
• A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit declared unanimously last month that gay marriage bans in Indiana and Wisconsin threaten "the welfare of American children."
Last month, a federal district judge in Louisiana became the first to uphold a state's ban in the wake of last year's Supreme Court rulings. Until then, gay marriage proponents had won every federal case.
 Richard Wolf, USA TODAY

May 22, 2014

The Tide in Gay Marriage has turned already

Pennsylvania won’t appeal a federal judge’s decision striking down the prohibition of same-sex marriage, said Tom Corbett, the Republican governor in the last northeastern state to have had a ban in effect and the latest leader to concede after a court loss.

The ruling yesterday made Pennsylvania the 25th state to have gay marriage declared legal by voters, lawmakers or courts, evenly dividing the nation almost a year after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling triggered a flood of lawsuits.

“As a Roman Catholic, the traditional teaching of my faith has not wavered,” Corbett said in a statement, adding he had to consider the prospect of a successful appeal in his decision. “I continue to maintain the belief that marriage is between one man and one woman.”

Corbett, who is running for re-election this year, is the latest governor to abandon defense of same-sex marriage bans after court rulings, following New Jersey Governor Chris Christie andNevada Governor Brian Sandoval, both Republicans.

Montana Governor Steve Bullock, a Democrat, said today that a federal judge should overturn his state’s ban after four couples sued. Bullock is at odds with the state’s Republican Attorney General Tim Fox, who promised today to defend the ban.

In Philadelphia, more than 50 gay couples have applied for marriage licenses, a clerk in the city’s Marriage License Bureau, said today. The office is staying open past regular business hours to accommodate the couples.

Discrimination Wall

Corbett’s decision helps break down a “dark wall of discrimination,” Chad Griffin, president of the advocacy group Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement following Corbett’s decision.

Corbett chose to defend his political aspirations over marriage, which is “a unique public good,” said Brian Brown, president of the Washington-based National Organization for Marriage, which was formed in 2007 to marshal opposition to same-sex marriage.

Pennsylvania joins 18 other states and the District of Columbia where same-sex marriage is currently available. In six other states, court rulings that such bans are unconstitutional have been put on hold during appeals.

Proponents of same-sex marriage have won at least a dozen consecutive victories since theSupreme Court overturned part of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act that said the federal government could only recognize heterosexual marriages. The high court also rejected an appeal of a decision that threw out a voter-approved California gay-marriage ban.

70 Cases

More than 70 marriage-equality cases are pending in 29 states and Puerto Rico, the Human Rights Campaign said. With Montana’s suit today, North Dakota and South Dakota are the only states remaining where marriage bans haven’t yet been challenged in court, the group said.

The wave of litigation prompted legal officers in some states to decide against defending the bans. Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, a Democrat, in July called the prohibition unconstitutional. Attorneys general in Kentucky, Illinois, Nevada, Virginia, Oregon and California, all Democrats, also refused to defend their bans.

At least four lawsuits were filed attacking Pennsylvania’s 1996 marriage law. U.S. District Judge John E. Jones in Harrisburg ruled on a challenge to the law by 11 gay couples and a widow.

An appeal of Jones’s ruling is “extremely unlikely to succeed” given the high legal threshold the judge set in the case, Corbett said.

Incest Comparison

Corbett was criticized by gay rights’ advocates in October for comparing gay marriage to incest. When asked his opinion in a television interview on arguments by state lawyers that gay marriage should be illegal just as marriage between children, Corbett said a better analogy would be between brother and sister. He later said he didn’t intend to offend anyone.

Same-sex marriage is supported by most Pennsylvanians, said Chris Borick, director of the Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion in Allentown.

Corbett’s decision not to challenge the ruling may appeal to the population broadly, but also “flirt with creating resentment” among social conservatives who may not show up to vote in November, he said.

“This year he’s trying fairly hard to make some appeals to the middle of the r
oad Pennsylvania voters,” Borick said.

The ACLU case is Whitewood v. Corbett, 13-cv-01861, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania (Harrisburg). The Montana case is Rolando v. Fox, 4:14-cv-00040, U.S. District Court, District Of Montana (Great Falls).

To contact the reporters on this story: Sophia Pearson in federal court in Philadelphia at; Erik Larson in New York at; Romy Varghese in Philadelphia at

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at; Stephen Merelman at Joe Schneider, Andrew Dunn

Featured Posts

Second Day at Home {Adamfoxie}

I will rather post important stories not being published the way they should or post information in a new format that will h...