Justice Sotomayor Warns of Another Ruling on Gay Marriage

 

 

There is been talk about this issue for a while. Those Gays backing a conservative court have argued that once you are married you are married. My answer has been only if you die. Rulings by a court that does not respect precedent put old issues back in the forefront. Justice Alito with Justice Thomas said it clearly after the abortion decision. All they need is the right case to be brought up to them and then what would we ask those gay Trump backers, Where are you going to hide? They seem to be gays with money maybe they leave the country for Canada but where does that leave the gay population in the States?

First, the LGBTQ+ community must accept we are in perilous times and these are not the times to play games at the box or not to stay home so as not to vote for Biden. The thing is we are not voting for Biden. We are voting for ourselves because there are things we want and need that we will not get from any modern President or Republican Congress or Cabin Republicans.

The warning is out!

Adam Gonzalez, Writer

(Dedicated to someone who did not get married then, Franklyn)

Newsweek

 

Liberal-leaning Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that the Court countered a landmark gay marriage ruling, Obergefell v. Hodges, in a recent case, Department of State v. Muñoz, warning that it could have negative implications for same-sex couples. In a 6-3 decision on Friday, the Court ruled against Sandra Muñoz, an American citizen who challenged a consular officer’s decision to bar her foreign husband Luis Asencio-Cordero from entering the United States to live with her. The U.S. consulate in San Salvador denied Asencio-Cordero’s visa application because he was found to be affiliated with the gang MS-13. The consular officer, however, did not disclose his reasoning for denying Asencio-Cordero’s application. Since Asencio-Cordero is not a U.S. citizen and therefore has no constitutional right to enter the country, he can’t elicit the consular officer’s reasoning or challenge the denial of his application.

FULL STORY