Federal Judge Overturns the Dassey Case of "Making a Murderer”
[Madison] A federal judge’s ruling that overturned the conviction of Brendan Dassey, who is serving a life sentence in connection with Teresa Halbach’s murder, will be appealed by the Wisconsin Department of Justice.
Attorney General Brad Schimel filed a notice of appeal Friday in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. On Aug. 12, Federal Magistrate William Duffin granted Dassey’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. Duffin’s ruling is stayed pending the outcome of the appeal.
“We believe the magistrate judge’s decision that Brendan Dassey’s confession was coerced by investigators, and that no reasonable court could have concluded otherwise, is wrong on the facts and wrong on the law,” said Schimel. “Two state courts carefully examined the evidence and properly concluded that Brendan Dassey’s confession to sexually assaulting and murdering Teresa Halbach with his uncle, Steven Avery, was voluntary, and the investigators did not use constitutionally impermissible tactics.”
Dell is bigger, and ready to rumble in the cloud wars
Schimel said Halbach's family "has been notified of the appeal and fully supports the State’s decision to seek justice on behalf of their daughter.”
Making a Murderer' prosecutors got it right, author says
The Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth at Northwestern University in Chicago, which is representing Dassey, issued a statement in the wake of the filing by the Department of Justice.
"We are disappointed in the State's decision to prolong Brendan's case by seeking an appeal," the release stated. "We look forward to continuing to defend his rights in court. Like Brendan, we remain grateful to his many supporters for their continued loyalty and strength.”
Making a Murderer, a Netflix documentary series that began airing last December, introduced millions of people to Avery and Dassey, and many legal experts and defense attorneys were taken aback at techniques used to interrogate Dassey.
Duffin's ruling gave prosecutors 90 days to decide whether to retry Dassey or release him. The judge had acknowledged that an appeal could extend the proceedings.
In his 91-page decision, Duffin criticized investigators and the state courts for their handling of the case. The judge determined that Dassey’s constitutional rights were violated and found that investigators made false promises to Dassey during questioning.
“These repeated false promises, when considered in conjunction with all relevant factors, most especially Dassey’s age, intellectual deficits, and the absence of a supportive adult, rendered Dassey’s confession involuntary under the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments,” Duffin wrote. Dassey was 16 when he was interrogated by detectives.
In the aftermath of Duffin’s ruling, legal experts expressed doubts over the prospect of retrying Dassey for Halbach's 2005 murder, citing the absence of his confession and a lack of physical evidence linking Dassey to the killing.
Dassey's conviction was not similar to Avery's case, which was based largely on DNA evidence. During separate trials in 2007, both Avery and Dassey were convicted of murder.
Avery also is seeking to overturn his conviction. His attorney recently filed a motion in Manitowoc County seeking detailed scientific testing of evidence in the case.
Avery remains in the Wisconsin prison system, serving life with no parole.
USA TODAY NETWORKAndy Thompson, The (Appleton, Wis.) Post-Crescent
I will urge you to see this series whenever possible on Netflix or some other way. I was uninterested at first but when I started seeing the miss-carriages of justice I was not only glued to the series but I was so disappointed that stories I read happening prior to the millennia are still happening today. Everything smelled of realism showing the good, the bad and the ugly.
Comments