Homosexuality is a "gender" versus a lifestyle of choice! by Forbiden Knowledge
forbidden
Forbidden Knowledge? In the dark ages, this is what religious authorities considered the Bible. The only authorized version was translated from the ancient Hebrew scriptures into Latin. Howbeit, only religious authorities (and a few royalty) were permitted to learn Latin. In general, the common masses were at the mercy of the religious minority when it came to knowing the forbidden texts. The religious elite took complete advantage and the masses were purposely kept in the dark. Instead, they manipulated the ancient texts to serve themselves! Once explored, the forbidden text in its original form is quite different than the authorized version. You might even be surprised to learn, many of the most popular characters of the Bible were homosexuals! God did not hate homosexuals nor consider homosexuality an abomination! In many cases, homosexuals were respected because they were kings, prophets, generals, goverment and court officials. A natural part of society; not an underground or sub-culture. The majoriy of heterosexuals do not care one way or the other about gay marriage. But they are religious and can be indirectly influenced by biblical doctrine. For example, about 400-years ago, a group of religious authorities (sanctioned by King James I of England), secretly manipulated the English version of the Bible to reflect their own heterosexual attitude; they opposed the king kissing other men in public. But most recently in revised versions (e.g. NKJV, NLT, NIV, ESV, NASB), religious authorities re-defined the Greek word "arsenokoites [ahr-sehn-noh-KOY-tehs]" of 1Corinthians 6:9 (and 1Timothy 1:10)! Howbeit, the most accurate translation, abusers of themselves with mankind [KJV], was pretty vague. forbidden Nevertheless, they replaced this vague 5-worded text with the not so vague and purposely targeted 1-word text, "homosexual(s)." True enough, the "abusers" of the aforementioned text is not clearly identified but "mankind" includes both males and females. Either way you cut it, this text does not describe homosexuals. And you might also consider, the entire chapter is directed to people in general. Be that as it may, this campaign gave those who were looking for a reason to justify their own homophobia a license to openly express their bigotry. It's easier if you re-invent "God" as a bigot, too. forbidden The first step was to pre-define "homosexuality" as a "lifestyle of choice." In other words, homosexuals are really "heterosexuals" with emotional problems, a chemical imbalance, strung out on drugs and/or spiritual degenerates who made a conscious decision to be gay; supported by 50-year old surveys (taken back when most homosexuals were terrified to be discovered) that suggest there are only a handful of homosexuals. This depiction made it easy for people to support Proposition 8 and the likes thereof. But suppose homosexuality is really a "gender" and homosexuals are actually a "race of people" ... ? forbidden You may think of "nationality," "ethnicity" or "skin color" when you think of "race." But these are simply the most common definitions used in our society. A race can also be any group of people classified/united together on the basis of a common history. Even "humans" as a whole are considered a race; although the group itself consists of various nationalities, ethnicities and complexions! Now, if homosexuals are a race of people, they would be instantly protected by the U.S. Constitution and instruments like Proposition 8 would be illegal. forbidd TAKE CONTROL! DEFINE WHO YOU ARE! The opposition spent millions pre-defining "homosexuality" based on mis-information that was never challenged! But there exists tons of reader-friendly information that prove: * homosexuality is a "gender" versus a lifestyle of choice! * homosexuals are a "race of people" versus heterosexuals suffering from mental illness! |
Comments