Live Updates: Trump Officials Push Back on Reports Contradicting Trump Take on Iran Nukes

As the cease-fire between Israel and Iran entered a second day, the Trump administration contradicted a preliminary, classified U.S. intelligence report that suggested American strikes did not significantly set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions.


Here’s the latest.

As the cease-fire between Israel and Iran appeared to be holding for a second day, Trump administration officials pushed back forcefully against the findings of a leaked preliminary U.S. intelligence report in arguing that American strikes dealt a fatal blow to Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

The comments by President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday were the latest in an effort to portray the 12-day war — the biggest and deadliest ever between Iran and Israel — as a success. They contradicted the findings of the much less optimistic U.S. intelligence report about the effects of the U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear sites.

Mr. Rubio offered a description of why he thought the Iranian nuclear effort had been set back for years, rather than months, as the preliminary Defense Intelligence Agency report leaked on Tuesday said. He said that a “conversion facility” at Isfahan was destroyed, robbing Iran of equipment that is key to producing a nuclear weapon. The preliminary intelligence report focused heavily on the state of another site, a deeply-buried enrichment plant in Fordo that produced near-bomb-grade fuel that, ultimately, would feed a conversion facility.

Mr. Rubio’s statements did not mention whether the conversion facility had been destroyed by American strikes or by Israel’s bombing campaign, which had hit the Isfahan site earlier in the war. It remains unknown whether Iran has built another conversion plant in secret.

Israel and Iran have both declared victory in the conflict. On Wednesday, both sought to restore a sense of normalcy after nearly two weeks of Israeli airstrikes, waves of retaliatory Iranian ballistic missiles and direct U.S. military involvement in bombing Iran’s nuclear sites.

In Israel, the authorities lifted emergency restrictions that had kept schools and workplaces closed since the beginning of the war, and the country’s busiest airport, Ben Gurion, near Tel Aviv, was expected to fully reopen on Wednesday, allowing thousands of passengers to travel. The Israeli military’s chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, said his country’s focus would now shift back to the campaign against Hamas in Gaza.

In Tehran, supporters of the Iranian government held a victory rally on Tuesday. In a televised address, President Masoud Pezeshkian praised his compatriots for their resilience. He also indicated in a call with the leader of the United Arab Emirates that Iran was ready to resume international talks about its nuclear program, whose destruction was the primary stated aim of the Israeli campaign.

Here’s what else to know:

  • Shaky start: The first day of the truce was far from smooth. The Israeli military said it had detected Iranian missile launches after the cease-fire had come into force, vowing a forceful response. Iran denied firing any missiles at Israel. Mr. Trump appeared visibly frustrated, scolding both countries in remarks to the media that included an expletive, and warning Israel against any further airstrikes.

  • Congress reacts: The Trump administration on Tuesday postponed classified briefings for Congress on the U.S. strikes against Iran, fueling outrage among Democrats who were angered that he had not notified Congress within 48 hours of the military action, as required by the War Powers Resolution. Read more >

  • Nuclear ambitions: Mr. Trump’s decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities is stirring fear that it will lead Iran and other countries to conclude that a nuclear arsenal is the only way to protect themselves. Read more >

David E. Sanger

White House and national security reporter

Trump told reporters at a news conference at NATO that he didn’t “think it was necessary” to sign some kind of agreement with Iran, presumably to get the country to commit to give up its nuclear ambitions. “We may sign an agreement, I don’t know.”

Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

Trump tells reporters at the NATO summit in the Hague that he is confident the conflict between Israel and Iran is over because they are “both tired, exhausted.”

“They have fought a hell of a war, very hard,” Trump said. “I think the war ended, actually, when we hit the various nuclear sites with planes.”

Helene Cooper

National security reporter

Trump, at the NATO summit, just mused about changing the name of the Defense Department to the War Department. He called Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth the “Secretary of War” and recalled that the Defense Department used to be the War Department before, he said, political correctness changed it.

David E. Sanger

White House and national security reporter

“All of the nuclear stuff is down there” in the tunnels of nuclear facilities, Trump said, seeming to reject to the argument that nuclear material was moved out of the target sites, especially Isfahan, before the U.S. struck the facilities with so-called bunker-busting bombs over the weekend.

Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

President Trump, speaking again at a NATO summit in the Netherlands, assailed the preliminary intelligence report that concluded that the military action had set Iran’s nuclear program back only by a number of months. He blamed the news media for calling into question the effectiveness of the strikes, even though the report was put together by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency.

Aaron Boxerman

Reporting from Jerusalem

The Israel Atomic Energy Commission said in a statement that the American strike on the reinforced Iranian nuclear site at Fordo “destroyed the site’s critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable.” Unusually, the White House put out the statement first, and it was only later confirmed by the Israeli prime minister’s office, which oversees the country’s nuclear commission.

The remarks come amid a growing debate over the effectiveness of the U.S. attacks on the Iranian nuclear program. President Trump has asserted that the sites were “obliterated.” But a preliminary and classified U.S. report found that the attacks set back the country’s nuclear program by only a few months.

In the statement, the Israeli nuclear commission was quoted as saying that the American attack, “combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran’s military nuclear program, has set back Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years.” It added that would remain the case so long as Iran did not gain access to nuclear material.

David E. Sanger

White House and national security reporter

Rubio Mounts Pushback Against Report on Iranian Nuclear Damage

Image
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the Iranian nuclear program has been set back years.Credit...Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times

President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio made their most detailed case yet on Wednesday for why they believe the American attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities dealt a fatal blow to the country’s ambitions, pushing back on the findings of a U.S. intelligence report and statements from international nuclear inspectors.

While Mr. Trump largely repeated his arguments that the facilities were “obliterated,” Mr. Rubio stepped in with a more detailed description of why he thought the Iranians were set back for years, rather than by only a few months as the preliminary Defense Intelligence Agency report said.

His argument centered on the belief that a “conversion facility” — which is key to converting nuclear fuel into the form needed to produce a nuclear weapon — was destroyed. The facility, in Isfahan, is where enriched uranium gas has been converted into solid materials, and ultimately a metal, that can be used to fabricate a nuclear bomb or a warhead.

Israel reported hitting the facility, and an associated laboratory for turning the fuel to metal, and The New York Times described the hit at the time. Independent analysts believe the plant was severely damaged.

“You can’t do a nuclear weapon without a conversion facility,” said Mr. Rubio, who serves simultaneously as interim national security adviser. “We can’t even find where it is, where it used to be on the map,” he added, speaking of the conversion facility. “The whole thing is blackened out. It’s gone. It’s wiped out.”

Satellite photographs show extensive destruction, but not until international nuclear inspectors are allowed on the site will it be possible to know what it would take to rebuild, on the site or elsewhere.

The report by the Defense Intelligence Agency focused largely on the state of the Fordo plant, the country’s deeply buried enrichment facility, which produced the near-bomb-grade fuel that would ultimately feed a conversion facility.

The United States used powerful “bunker buster” bombs to hit that plant. 

International inspectors and nuclear experts agree that the extensive damage to the conversion facility created a key bottleneck in the weapons-making process, and agreed that rebuilding it would likely take years. But that assumes, of course, that Iran did not build another conversion plant in secret, as part of an insurance policy against the destruction of its “declared” facilities, which are inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

In a separate assessment, David Albright and Spencer Faragasso of the nonpartisan Institute for Science and International Security, a nonprofit organization that follows the state of the Iranian program in depth, wrote on Wednesday that “Israel’s and U.S. attacks have effectively destroyed Iran’s centrifuge enrichment program.” They concluded “it will be a long time before Iran comes anywhere near the capability it had before the attack.” But their report noted that stocks of near-bomb-grade uranium and lesser-enriched materials remain, along with centrifuges that had been manufactured, but not yet installed. Iran may have moved some of the material to secret locations.

The same report noted that the conversion facility was “severely damaged.”

Mr. Trump argued that Iran had essentially given up its nuclear ambitions, saying they are not “even thinking” about nuclear enrichment anymore, though he did not provide any evidence to back up that assessment. Mr. Rubio was more careful. “Now anything in the world can be rebuilt," he said, “but now we know where it is, and if they try to rebuild it, we’ll have an option there as well.”

Mr. Rubio also railed against the leaks of the Defense Intelligence Agency report by “staffers” and said the F.B.I. had been asked to investigate.

Aaron Boxerman

Reporting from Jerusalem

Speaking at a cabinet meeting, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel said that the country had secured “a great victory in the campaign against the enemy who sought our destruction,” referring to Iran. Netanyahu promised that the Israeli government would work speedily to help those harmed by the fighting recoup their losses and rebuild their lives.

Aaron Boxerman

Reporting from Jerusalem

The Israeli military just said it shot down an incoming drone believed to have been fired from Yemen. The Houthis, a Yemeni militia backed by Iran, have been firing ballistic missiles and drones at Israel for well over a year in support of their Palestinian allies in Gaza.

Vivian Yee

Iran’s Parliament has voted in favor of a bill to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, according to Press TV, a state-owned news channel. The bill would block nuclear inspectors from entering Iran unless the “security of facilities is guaranteed,” the broadcaster reported, without giving further details.

But to take effect, the legislation must be approved by Iran’s Guardian Council, a body partly appointed by the country’s supreme leader that also decides which candidates are allowed to run in elections. The bill could offer Iran another way to defy the United States and Israel, giving it leverage in any potential new negotiations over its nuclear program. There was no immediate comment from the I.A.E.A.

Adam Rasgon

Reporting from Jerusalem

The Israeli military says the war set back Iran’s nuclear program by ‘years.’

Image
A satellite image shows the perimeter of the Fordo nuclear facility, south of Tehran, on Tuesday.Credit...Maxar Technologies

Israel’s military said on Wednesday that Iran’s nuclear program had been delayed by years, a day after the disclosure of a preliminary U.S. intelligence assessment that said it had only been set back by only a few months.

The assertion by Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin, the Israeli military’s chief spokesman, comes as questions swirl about the status of Iran’s nuclear program after Israeli and U.S. strikes over 12 days of war. It added to a chorus of public comments from senior Israeli and U.S. officials that contradict the early American intelligence assessment.

“The assessment is that we caused significant damage to the nuclear program,” General Defrin said in a video statement. “I can also say that we pushed it back years.”

The Israeli military, General Defrin noted, was still investigating the results of its strikes on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

His comments contradicted a preliminary, classified report by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency said that the bombings set back Iran’s nuclear program by less than six months. Officials cautionedthat the report was only an initial assessment, and that others would follow as more information was collected and as Iran examined the three sites Iranian state news outlets, which tend to amplify any foreign news developments that appear to support Iranian positions, widely reported on the assessment.

General Defrin’s remarks also appeared to be unaligned with preliminary Israeli damage assessments as reported by The New York Times on Tuesday, which raised questions about the effectiveness of U.S. strikes on Iran’s heavily fortified nuclear enrichment facility at Fordo, south of Tehran. Israeli defense officials said they had collected evidence that the underground facilities at Fordo were not destroyed.

However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has insisted that the war sent Iran’s nuclear program, “into oblivion.” And President Trump, who on Wednesday pushed back on the classified preliminary U.S. intelligence, has claimed that U.S. strikes “obliterated three Iranian nuclear sites.

On June 13, Israel launched a wide-scale attack on Iran, targeting the country’s nuclear facilities, nuclear scientists and senior military commanders. Iran retaliated by firing barrages of missiles at Israel. 

After more than a week of war, the U.S. military joined in to attack three Iranian nuclear sites. On Tuesday, Israel and Iran agreed to a cease-fire.

Vivian Yee contributed reporting to this article.

Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

Trump reiterates claims about Iran’s nuclear program that contradict early intelligence findings.

Image



President Donald Trump in The Hague on Tuesday.Credit...Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times

President Trump pushed back Wednesday on the findings of a preliminary classified U.S. report, insisting again that Iran’s nuclear program was obliterated despite the early intelligence suggesting U.S. strikes had set the program back only by a few months.

The Trump administration has rebuked the media for reporting on that early assessment from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, which officials said found that U.S. strikes had sealed off entrances to two of three nuclear sites but not collapsed their underground buildings.

When pressed on Wednesday at the NATO summit in the Netherlands about whether the intelligence report was incorrect, Mr. Trump — who has often questioned the findings of America's own intelligence agencies — said it was “very inconclusive” and that officials at the agency “really don’t know.” There was no reason to worry about Iran rebuilding its nuclear program, he said, reiterating his claims about “obliteration.”

“It’s gone for years, years,” he said. “Very tough to rebuild because the whole thing has collapsed. In other words, inside, it’s all collapsed. Nobody can get in to see it because it’s collapsed.”

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, whose agency conducted the classified preliminary report, also questioned its accuracy, arguing that the U.S. strikes were “flawless.”

Video
0:00/0:38

Hegseth claimed the heavy bombs used in the mission caused “devastation” at the Fordo nuclear site.

Mr President, when you talk to the people who built the bombs, understand what those bombs can do and deliver those bombs. They landed precisely where they were supposed to. So it was a flawless mission — “Flawless.” Right down where we knew they needed to enter. And given the 30,000 pounds of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordo. And the amount of munitions, six per location, any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives. And we know that, because when you actually look at the report, by the way, it was a top secret report, it was preliminary, it was low confidence.

Hegseth claimed the heavy bombs used in the mission caused “devastation” at the Fordo nuclear site.

“Any assessment that tells you something otherwise is speculating with other motives, and we know that because when you actually look at the report — by the way, it was a top secret report — it was preliminary, it was low confidence,” he said at the NATO summit, adding that the Pentagon was working with the F.B.I. to conduct a leak investigation.

The report also said that much of Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was moved before the strikes. Israeli officials and the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, have also suggested the same.

But on Wednesday, Mr. Trump said he did not believe Iran had time to move materials, including uranium, out of the facilities.

“I believe they didn’t have a chance to get anything out because we acted fast,” he said. “If it would have taken two weeks, maybe, but it’s very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous for them to remove it.”

Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

When pressed on whether the preliminary classified U.S. reportwas incorrect, President Trump said it was “very inconclusive.”

“The intelligence says, ‘We don’t know. It could have been very severe,’” Trump said. “That’s what the intelligence says. So I guess that’s correct, but I think we can take the ‘we don’t know it was very significant.’ It was obliteration.”

Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

President Trump said the U.S. attack on Iran may bring progress to the negotiations between Israel and Gaza.

“I think great progress is being made on Gaza,” he said. “I think because of this attack that we made, I think we’re going to have some very good news.”

Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

Even as President Trump said he did not want to make a direct comparison, he said the U.S strikes against Iran were analogous to the Americans dropping atomic bombs on Japan at the end of World War II.

“I don’t want to use an example of Hiroshima,” he said. “I don’t want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war. This ended the war. If we didn’t take that out, they would have been they’d be fighting right now.”

Video
0:00/0:18

That hit ended the war. That hit ended the war. I don’t want to use an example of Hiroshima. I don’t want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing that ended that war. This ended that with the war. If we didn’t take that out, they would have been, they’d be fighting right now.

That hit ended the war.
CreditCredit...Reuters
Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

President Trump, who is meeting with NATO leaders at the alliance’s annual summit in The Hague, said he thinks Iran’s nuclear program has been set back by decades after the U.S. and Israeli strikes. The findings of a preliminary classified U.S. reportsaid the American bombing of three nuclear sites in Iran set back the country’s nuclear program by only a few months.

“I don’t think they’ll ever do it again,” Trump said of the Iranians. “They just went through hell. I think they’ve had it. The last thing they want to do is enrich.”

Image
Credit...Maxar Technologies
Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, whose agency conducted the preliminary classified U.S. report that concluded that the U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities set the program back by only a few months, argued on Wednesday that the American strikes were “flawless.”

“Any assessment that tells you something otherwise is speculating with other motives, and we know that because when you actually look at the report — by the way, it was a top secret report — it was preliminary, it was low confidence,” he said.

Video
0:00/0:38

Hegseth claimed the heavy bombs used in the mission caused “devastation” at the Fordo nuclear site.

Mr President, when you talk to the people who built the bombs, understand what those bombs can do and deliver those bombs. They landed precisely where they were supposed to. So it was a flawless mission — “Flawless.” Right down where we knew they needed to enter. And given the 30,000 pounds of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordo. And the amount of munitions, six per location, any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives. And we know that, because when you actually look at the report, by the way, it was a top secret report, it was preliminary, it was low confidence.

Mr President, when you talk to the people who
Hegseth claimed the heavy bombs used in the mission caused “devastation” at the Fordo nuclear site.
Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

Hegseth said the Pentagon was working with the F.B.I. to conduct a leak investigation and blamed news organizations for “trying to spin it to make the president look bad when this was an overwhelming success.”

Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

The Israeli military just said it shot down an incoming drone believed to have been fired from Yemen. The Houthis, a Yemeni militia backed by Iran, have been firing ballistic missiles and drones at Israel for well over a year in support of their Palestinian allies in Gaza.

Tyler Pager

Reporting from The Hague

President Trump, who is meeting with NATO leaders on Wednesday at the alliance’s annual summit in The Hague, just said that the cease-fire between Israel and Iran is “going very well.” Speaking at a meeting with the NATO secretary general, Mark Rutte, he said he was “so proud” of Israel for turning around their planes, at his behest on Tuesday, after Iran had “a little bit of a violation” of the truce. 


Comments

Popular Posts