Crimea Bridge Hit By Underground Explosives by Ukraine

Over 1 thousand Kilos of explosives

Kirsch bridge aerial view

The bridge has a total of 4 lanes going both ways and also a connecting bridge for rail cargo trains.

 It was hit in 2022 and 2023 on the top of the bridge. The damage was serious but Russia was able to repair it at least for Traffic and limited rail. This time it was different.

The Kirsch bridge is the only way to connect Ukrainian Crimea to  Russia. This is a bridge built under Putin's decree costing a few Billion dollars. The bridge has a lot of significance since Russia took Crimea from Ukraine in 2014. Putin wanted to make a Naval, Air bases with Radars equipped to see all traffic on air and  naval up the coast and the west side of Crimea. They did but then Ukraine destroyed I/3 of their ships using mini sub-boats making them no longer being anchored  off the coast of Crimea.

An information that can't be confirmed yet, Ukrainian from men approach the bridge like it was a maintenance crew. Meanwhile they were carrying  at least one Heavy torpedo which they swam and installed under the bridge on the pylon's. Then at their leisure after they were well clear of it they detonated at least one torpedo. They have come to the conclusion that hitting the bridge from the supports underneath will be more doable than risking F14 flying in to hit the top.

By the way the usual nightly bombing from the Russians to Ukraine cities did not include bombers which made the job to protecting the cities a bit easier but still with drones they will hit something. That tell you the Russians are hurt and their wings are not permanently clipped but for the moment they don't have a lot of bombers to come to the Border of Ukraine and unleash hell. They are very aware they might lost a few but even one lost means a lot when you lost 1/3 of your inventory to drones.

I will keep you updated if there is something where I can add information to what is being publish on the main media.

Adam Gonzalez, Writer

See vid

https://youtu.be/gvUtMCqme8g

@jastrapper190

1 hour ago

I’m a Civil/Structural Engineer. I’ve also worked as a Marine Infantryman who has had extensive training and real world experience (in Iraq over three combat deployments) in military demolitions. You can certainly use demolitions to destroy damns, bridges, buildings. The problem comes in the amount of explosives needed and the time and preparation necessary to actually do the job. To destroy something like the Hoover Dam… you’re looking at semi trucks full of demolitions. Dozens of Men (possibly divers) needing full access to the entire structure (inside and out). Days of preparation. Even taking out a pylon/foundation for a bridge… it’s a massive blob of concrete. It takes ALOT of time and preparation to do enough damage to the structure to render it unusable/collapse it. The one thing in this video that helps reduce the quanties… is that the detonation was underwater. You’re using the water to tamp and direct the force. This is good/ideal. Like holding a firecracker in an open palm… vs a closed fist. Directly against the concrete as deep as possible. That’s the goal. But even then… takes ALOT of explosive material to shear that much concrete and reinforcing steel.