February 19, 2012

A Gymnast!


 I’m giving Patrick a break from his weekly Sports Stud duties and taking the helm to bring you a hot piece of gymnast to get you prepared for the 2012 Summer Olympics. C’mon, I know all you guys love watching the male gymnasts work the rings, poles and floor during their days of competition. Those outfits perfectly defining the muscles underneath don’t hurt either, am I right?
  Dutch gymnast Yuri Van Gelder who’s best discipline is the rings and you check the pictures below, you’ll understand why. Yuri is quite decorated winning gold in rings at the 2005 European Championships held in Debrecen, Hungary. He became a world champion in the same discipline at the 2005 World Artistic Gymnastics Championships in Australia.
Scandal and controversy also follow Yuri around. In the summer of 2009, van Gelder admitted to doing cocaine three days before the Dutch championships in Rotterdam. He stated that he regretted the lapse and even called himself incredibly stupid. After this, Yuri had to return his national championship gold medal and was suspended by the Dutch Gymnastics union. He was also released from his job with the Dutch military as they have a zero-tolerance drug policy.
In 2010, he pulled out of the world competition with team mates citing personal medical reasons for his departure. Other reports claimed that he had refused to answer questions about drugs and had once again relapsed. In April of 2011, Yuri returned to the rings to compete at the European Championships. He was a bit shaky but definitely proved that the rings were his home. Check out a few photos below.


Yuri’s giving me bedroom eyes. You don’t have to ask me twice.







Qatar Tiny Anti Gay and Full of Gay Sex

 How a population imbalance makes Qataris turn to gay sex for release, despite the state’s denial and persecution
Behind the modern face of West Bay in Doha, Qatar's capital, there are outdated attitudes to lesbian and gay sex.
In some ways Qatar is a bit of a sociological experiment. What happens when men and women are segregated, where men outnumber women three to one, and sex outside marriage is a serious taboo? Turning to people of the same gender appears to be the answer.
On the surface, the staunchly conservative view that homosexuality is a sin, a western disease, and, according to religious leaders like Yusuf Al-Qaradhawi and Bilal Philips, something that should be punishable by death, continues to be the status quo presented to the outside world. And, yet, under the surface, homosexual acts are widespread.
The reality, however, is many taking part in these activities are essentially ‘straight’. And among those who are sexually active with members of the same sex, there is still a major concern about being seen as or labelled as gay. Therefore, a system of justification has developed where, if someone is on the receiving end of sexual contact, they are gay… the giver is not. To have sexual relations with people of the same sex has been justified through a variety of ways and has become fairly widespread and common.
The result, however, helps to add confusion to the issues around homosexuality. It is hard to argue that homosexuals haven’t made a choice when clearly there are straight people who are making a conscious (though often in a haze of denial and justifications) decision to have sex with members of their own gender as a way of finding sexual release.
It’s similar to the idea of prison sexuality, harem sexuality or priests who have dedicated their life to celibacy who may seek sexual fulfillment from other sources. It is fair to say that these realities are, in a great part, due to a denial that humans are sexual beings, and that denying sex doesn’t mean that the desires go away. They do come out in one way or another. So, this is happening on a national scale here in Qatar, and other countries in the region.
Sex exploitation of migrant workers
Recently, Gay Middle East, which I am Qatar editor of, and GSN ran a story on Africans allegedly being brought as sexual slaves to the Gulf region. Asians are also at a high risk of exploitation and harassment. It would be very easy in Qatar to take advantage of people for sex, especially among domestic workers.
In the case of homosexual advances, if a person were to come forward about harassment to the police or other authorities, they risk serious prosecution, with being deported as the end result, especially if the advances ended in a sexual encounter. And often, these advances are made by people who hold a certain amount of power over the people they are harassing. An employer can make life very difficult for their employee, either by withholding pay, withholding a passport, refusing to give permission to seek another job, or refusing them permission to leave the country. This is the result of a sponsorship system that gives power to the employer and little to the employee.
A friend from Hong Kong, who was walking to a nearby mall, was offered a ride from a Qatari gentleman recently. He thought this was nice and took the guy up on the offer. When they arrived, the Qatari asked if they could have sex. Another friend went to a Thai massage parlour for a legitimate Thai massage. Turns out, it wasn’t that kind of place. The male, Thai masseuse offered additional services... Asians seem to be on the front lines of this. A demand seems to be there for young Asian men as well as African sex slaves.
One specific group, the large Filipino population in Qatar, have developed somewhat of a stigma as having a high concentration of homosexuality in their community. This is not so much because there are more lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender people among Filipino, it tends to be based purely on stereotypes: The way they talk and look, more often than not, the higher pitched voice which sometimes come across as effeminate, the youthful looks, the smooth skin and often lack of facial hair, maybe?
In the late 90s, 40 Filipino workers were deported on suspicion of being gay: key word being ‘suspicion’. This led to an ad campaign by the Philippine government to warn potential workers wishing to go to Qatar that gays were banned from working there. In the middle of July last year, there was a tremendous amount of anger expressed by some Qatari’s over Filipino comedian Vice Ganda, who is perceived to be gay and felt that his mere presence in the country was an affront to the values and traditions of Qatar. At the same time, this stigma, which outwardly is seen as such a negative, does mean that the Filipino population garners a certain amount of attention from those seeking sex.
A statistical fact
Female same-sex encounters also relate to the population imbalance. According to Qatar Statistics Authority, of the 1,759,227 people living in Qatar as of 31 January 2012 (the highest yet recorded in an ever-fluctuating overall population), only 26% of the population is female. This creates a situation where men turn to men for sexual fulfillment. And, with the ‘purity’ of a woman being key to her ability to marry, there is a low number of girls who are ‘available’ for sexual encounters. And because these girls are ‘off limits’, guess where the girls are turning to? That’s right, each other. There is nothing wrong with this, but if a country’s laws are so stiffly against acts of homosexuality, creating the perfect societal conditions for widespread gay sex seems counterproductive.
Whatever the causes, same-sex activity is happening. A continual denial of this doesn’t make sense. Qatar has to start being more honest with itself. If homosexual acts are taking place, then why on earth should being gay be such a problem?
It’s time for Qatari society to take a good, hard look at itself and be truthful. Go back to the Quran and other holy texts. Does Allah not tell his followers to learn, understand, develop, discover and gain knowledge? Well, here we are – ready to explain what homosexuality is and who the LGBT community is.
It’s time for a mature conversation about this and re-evaluate what it is that Allah really wants. It’s time to put our new understanding into practice, not ignore it and hope it will go away. And, sadly, with this denial and pushing almost all sexual activity underground, it is creating a situation where people are being sexually exploited, used and abused. 


gaystarnews.com



Religion and Faith Rules 'End at The Temple Door'



Trevor PhillipsTrevor Phillips is chairman of government body the Equality and Human Rights Commission

 Christians who argue they should be exempt from equality laws are no different from Muslims who want to impose sharia law in the UK, human rights chief Trevor Phillips has said.

He told a debate religious rules should lose sway "at the door of the temple”
 Christian adoption agencies and hotel owners have fought legal battles against rules requiring them to treat gay and straight people equally.
But Mr Phillips said those who provide a public service must abide by the law.
Catholic adoption agencies have objected to legislation which requires them not to discriminate between gay and straight couples on the grounds of sexuality when considering applications.

Last year, after a High Court case, the Charity Commission refused to grant an exemption for one Leeds-based agency, Catholic Care.
Disputes have also arisen where Christian bed and breakfast owners have turned away gay couples and subsequently been ordered to pay damages.
Mr Phillips, chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, wasspeaking at a debate organised by the Religion and Society Research Programme.

 Asked about conflicts between religion and equalities, he said: “The    Asked about conflicts between religion and equalities, he said: "The law stops at the door of the temple as far as I'm concerned.          
"Once you start to provide public services that have to be run under public rules, for example child protection, then you have to go with public law.
"Institutions have to make a decision whether they want to do that or they don't want to do that, but you can't say 'because we decide we're different then we need a different set of laws'."
He continued: "To me there's nothing different in principle with a Catholic adoption agency, or indeed Methodist adoption agency, saying the rules in our community are different and therefore the law shouldn't apply to us.
"Why not then say sharia can be apply to different parts of the country? It doesn't work."
Sharia law is Islam's legal system and is derived from both the Koran and fatwas - the rulings of Islamic scholars.
Sharia councils have been working in the UK for several decades with the key areas being family law, finance and business - although they have no legal powers to impose penalties.
Former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey told the Daily Mail Mr Phillips' comparison with sharia was "ridiculous".
Rt Rev Michael Nazir-Ali, former Bishop of Rochester, said: "Trevor Phillips in the past has argued for respect for Christian conscience. I am very surprised that here he seems to be saying there should be a totalitarian kind of view in which a believer's conscience should not be respected."
But Keith Porteous Wood, from the National Secular Society, agreed with Mr Phillips, saying: "There is no such thing as partial equality and every time an exemption is made, someone else's rights are compromised. 




Google Sued by Safari User Over Privacy

 
 By Phil Milford and Jef Feeley




Google Inc. officials were sued for violating users’ privacy rights on Apple Inc.’s Safari Web browser by bypassing computer settings designed to block monitoring of consumers’ online activity.
Google, the world’s biggest Internet-search company, has been dodging privacy settings in Safari, which serves as the primary Web browser on Apple’s iPhone and iPad products, lawyers for an Illinois man who uses the Safari browser said in a lawsuit filed today in federal court in Delaware.

“Google’s willful and knowing actions violated” federal wiretapping laws and other computer-related statutes, attorneys for Matthew Soble said in the complaint.
Google has drawn regulatory scrutiny and pressure from consumer advocates for the way it handles personal information. Last year, it agreed to settle claims with the Federal Trade Commission that Google used deceptive tactics and violated its own privacy policies when it introduced its Buzz social- networking service in 2010.
Chris Gaither, a spokesman for Mountain View, California- based Google, said in an e-mail that the company declined to comment on the suit’s allegations.
Researchers at Stanford University said today Google programmers developed codes that allowed them to avoid privacy settings created by their rivals at Cupertino, California-based Apple.
Privacy Circumvented?
The settings were designed to block cookies, or small pieces of code, that can be used to follow users’ activities on the Web. The Wall Street Journal reported Google’s actions in bypassing the privacy settings earlier this week.
Soble is seeking class-action status for his suit, which was filed on behalf of individuals “whose default privacy settings on the web browser software produced by Apple, known as Safari, were knowingly circumvented by Google,” according to the suit.
Google’s actions also prompted Consumer Watchdog to send a letter to the FTC today demanding action against the Internet- search provider.
“Safari users with the browser set to block third-party cookies thought they were not being tracked,” John Simpson, privacy project director of Consumer Watchdog, said in the letter. “Nonetheless, because of an element invisible to the user, but designed to mimic a form, DoubleClick was able to set tracking cookies in an obvious violation of the set preference.”
Lawmaker Attention
The allegations that Google bypassed Apple’s privacy settings to gather information on user’s Web browsing habits also have drawn attention from lawmakers.
“I fully intend to look into this matter and determine the extent to which the practice was used by Google and other third parties to circumvent consumer choice,” West Virginia Senator John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV, a Democrat and chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said in a statement.
“We are taking immediate steps to address concerns, and we are happy to answer any questions regulators and others may have,” Google’s Gaither said in an e-mailed response.
The case is Matthew Soble v. Google Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Wilmington). washingtonpost.com





What Happened to Bobby at Funeral?


Bobby Brown: Why I Left Whitney Houston's Funeral
Bobby Brown
Eagle Press
  As fans, friends and family members honored the lateWhitney HoustonSaturday, rumors swirled about the man who wasn't in attendance at the singer's funeral: her ex-husband, Bobby Brown. 

But buzz that he was turned away from Newark, N.J.'s New Hope Baptist Church isn't true, Brown tells PEOPLE in a statement, and his absence was the result of a mix-up with security. 

"My children and I were invited to the funeral of my ex-wife Whitney Houston," Brown, 43, says. "We were seated by security and then subsequently asked to move on three separate occasions. I fail to understand why security treated my family this way and continue to ask us to move." 

The problem then escalated, he says, when security prevented him from seeing his daughter with Houston, Bobbi Kristina, who was briefly hospitalized after having a nervous breakdown last week. 

"In light of the events, I gave a kiss to the casket of my ex-wife and departed as I refused to create a scene," he says. "My children are completely distraught over the events." 

Of Houston, whom he wed in 1992 and divorced in 2007 after a rocky, highly publicized relationship, he says he will "continue to pay my respects to my ex-wife the best way I know how." 

"This was a day to honor Whitney," he adds of the singer, who died last week at 48. "I doubt Whitney would have wanted this to occur." 

Conflicting Reports

Before Brown's clarification, his presence (or lack thereof) was the topic of much debate and Twitter chat. 

One onlooker saw the R&B singer outside the church. "He hugged his brother and then got in a car, and they drove him off," the source told PEOPLE. "They wouldn't allow him in." 

Reports of Brown inside the church also made headlines. 

"He walked by Whitney's casket and then came back up the isle," HLN Tweeted. "His eyes were red, and his head was down." 

A relative told PEOPLE that Brown was indeed invited to the funeral and that Houston's family knew he was attending and wanted to support his daughter.

"She wanted her dad to be there for her mom," the relative said of Bobbi Kristina. 


 
BY ALISON SCHWARTZ AND DEBRA LEWIS-BOOTHMAN
people.com





Alec Baldwin Calls Breitbart a ‘festering boil on the anus


Alec Baldwin photographed by David Shankbone via Flickr
   
Apparently Keith Olbermann isn’t the only person who thinks Andrew Breitbart’s recent attempt to smear the “Occupy” movement as serial rapists is a bit beyond the pale. Mediaite is reporting that actor Alec Baldwin took to Twitter today to excoriate the Big Government blogger and media provocateur, calling him a “festering boil on the anus of public discourse.”

The dust-up began when a Twitter user asked Baldwin’s opinion as to whether Breitbart was using the so-called “rape rant” as a smoke screen to distract public attention away from the Shirley Sherrod scandal. (Sherrod was a USDA employee whose career and reputation were impugned in a heavily doctored video that was first aired on Breitbart’s website.)
Baldwin replied to the query with the very descriptive phrase mentioned above, which prompted a great deal of back and forth between the 30 Rock star and Breitbart, as well as many of Breitbart’s and Baldwin’s fans. The actor threw in the towel around 2:00 pm, Tweeting, “OK, enough festering boils for this weekend.”

rawstory.com


Sarkozy {France} To Expel Homophobe MP


UMP deputy Christian Vanneste, right, with French president Nicolas Sarkozy in Lille last month. Photograph: Pascal Rossignol/Reuters
President Nicolas Sarkozy's party is to expel an MP who said gay people held too much sway in France and downplayed the persecution of gays during the second world war.
The comments by Christian Vanneste unleashed an outpouring of criticism from left and right and embarrassed Sarkozy's conservative UMP party just as the president announced he would seek a second term.
Vanneste, who is part of the influential hard-right wing of Sarkozy's party, looks set to be ousted from the UMP and could lose his seat in parliament.
In a video broadcast on a French website, Vanneste said gays were "at the heart of power" in France, manipulating the media and making humankind "lose its dignity".
He said the media overplayed "the famous legend of the deportation of homosexuals" from Nazi-occupied France, saying German gays were sent to concentration camps, but "there was no homosexual deportation in France".
Gay rights groups denounced him and UMP members said he had crossed a line. In response, Vanneste said he was being unfairly targeted by a "gay lobby".
UMP secretary general Jean-Francois Cope said Vanneste would be expelled because of his "deeply shocking and intolerable comments" after a meeting next week.
Vanneste is likely to be barred from running as the UMP's candidate for parliament from his district in northern France in legislative elections in June.
Vanneste has made remarks seen as disparaging to gays in the past, but touched a particularly sensitive chord by referring to the second world war.
The uproar puts Sarkozy's party in a tough position as he seeks to garner support from the far right to bolster his weak re-election chances.
Sarkozy condemned the remarks on national television, saying he was "horrified by anything that from near or far could appear to be homophobia".





Maryland To The Altar } Jersey Gets a veto} A Gay politician Defends Christie



As Much disappointed that we all are about Christies Veto in NJ, some of us are very disappointed at gay politicians and apologists that call this “ Just Political” Everything is political in politics, does that makes not mean spirited and abusive and bad. Look a the dirty lube man ‘Santorum’. He is political.
So let’s not start making excuses for this man. I found a good article at boyculture.typepad.com.  I think they reflect my feelings very well:
adamfoxie*


 “"New Jersey passes marriage equality, only to have it vetoed by useless human slug Chris Christie. Disappointing, but then so was the statement put out by Steven Goldstein of New Jersey's Garden State Equality—he rightly called out Christie's veto as "a brutally anti-gay act, pure and simple," yet started out by arguing that Christie doesn't have "an anti-gay bone in his body" (it's all political) and mentioning that Christie is a straight shooter who does what he says he'll do, for better or worse.

These are the kinds of things that supporters of Christie should be pushing, not supporters of gay rights. The issue is not, "Gee, I don't know if I can vote for Christie—he's so anti-gay!" "No, girl, he's not..." (as it is sometimes with Obama), the issue is that Christie is against this issue that is very important to the vast majority of the LGBT community. Whether he's doing it for political reasons is neither here nor there.
I'm with GSE and am sure they've done more than I have on this topic, but this was a really tone-deaf statement.
But at least we got Maryland legistlatively (barely—it passed with zero votes to spare, and we owe it to a runaway bride who once co-sponsored the bill then killed it but ultimately voted for it). And Maryland's governor will be signing this puppy into law.
The article on Steve Rothaus can be found at the  Miami Herald



Turn The Page

Here You can find the button to see the Previous Pages
The pages are in an eternal mode.
HOME or OLDER POSTS >>

Amazon Slide Misc

Custom Search

Custom Search

Amazon SearchBox

Search This Blog

Loading...

Unique Men’s Jewelry

Amazon.com