Biden is Being asked Why He should Not Skip The Next Debate


I was looking forward to the debate but I could not stayed watching it. I went to bed. To have a fucked up(forgive me)man tals like this, saying the most outrageous things like if it was not the whole nation who is in play. He does not care what comes out of that mouth full of arificial ceramics and false teeth. That would have been fine if he said it in a civil way and let his oponent speak. But that is true and everyone that knows Trump has said it, on a conversation when he does not want to listen he just open his mouth and takes over. Reminds me of my brothers on an argument. No way to argue.   What do hou think? should Biden go back to the griender?
 
Biden campaign faces questions about whether he should skip next debates
The campaign insisted he would participate in the final two, but some Democrats said he should demand rule changes.

 Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden listens during the first presidential debate with President Donald Trump Tuesday, Sept. 29, 2020.

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden listens during the first presidential debate with President Donald Trump. | Olivier Douliery/Pool vi AP

{By NATASHA KORECKI and ALEX ISENSTADT}
 
The moment Joe Biden’s first debate against Donald Trump ended, his campaign was already confronted with questions about whether it should be his last.

In the two men’s first head-to-head matchup, Trump bullied moderator Chris Wallace, blew past his time limits and repeatedly and loudly interrupted Biden.
 
It resulted in a mockery of presidential debates, growing so chaotic that it was impossible to follow entire segments.

The Biden campaign immediately shot down any notion the former vice president wouldn’t show up to debates in Miami and Nashville next month.

But some Democrats wondered whether Biden should only participate if there are more stringent conditions placed on Trump to keep the night from devolving into chaos. 

(Politico)
Interruptions. Insults. Chaos. POLITICO's Gabby Orr breaks down the key moments from Tuesday night's showdown between Trump and Biden — and what it all means for the final stretch of the campaign.

In a call with reporters after the debate, the campaign was asked whether it would commit to the next two debates and whether it would seek changes with the debate commission. Biden deputy campaign manager Kate Bedingfield said only that the campaigns are in ongoing talks with the debate commission and “I would imagine there would be some additional conversations” going forward. 

Delaware Sen. Chris Coons, a top Biden surrogate, said it wasn't obvious Biden should commit to future debates.

“I’m going to leave that to the campaign,” he said. But if the point of debates is to allow the candidates to articulate a message to viewers, Coons said, Tuesday's fracas failed the test.

“It was very hard to follow what was being said, and President Trump showed not just disrespect to the moderator, but to the American people who tuned in trying to figure out what his plans are,” Coons said. “The point of the debate is for the American people to make a decision, informed by hearing from the two candidates on what’s your record, what are your values? Joe Biden came prepared to respect the American people. Donald Trump did not.”

Simon Rosenberg, a former senior consultant for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said Biden's campaign should seek rule changes for the next two debates, on Oct. 15 and Oct. 22. Vice President Mike Pence and Sen. Kamala Harris square off on Oct. 7.

“Of course, Biden and Harris should keep debating. But they should work to make sure Trump can’t repeat his performance tonight,” Rosenberg said. “Moderators should have the ability to cut off his mic and split screens should be limited. Let them talk to the American people without the other facial expressions and interruptions registering.”

 President Donald Trump listens during the first presidential debate with Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden Tuesday, Sept. 29, 2020.

Why Trump resorted to torching the debate
Undecided voters call Trump ‘unhinged’ and ‘un-American’ — but are unswayed by debate
‘I heard it differently’: Trump allies play defense on hate group remarks
Trump continues jabbing at moderator Wallace in debate's wake
SCOTUS battle crashes into decisive Senate race in Iowa

The most tense moments of the first debate
 
Trump aides said they relished the freewheeling debate, saying it benefited the incumbent’s style. But they also reserved criticism for the debate moderator, Fox News host Chris Wallace.

“Chris Wallace jumped in too often to save Biden from himself when he had backed himself into a corner or couldn’t come up with an answer,” said Trump campaign spokesman Tim Murtaugh.
Advertisement

People close to the president said he was jubilant upon exiting the stage, and many in his inner circle were thrilled with his performance. Trump dominated with his aggressive approach, they argued.

But other Republicans worried that Trump’s aggressiveness won't play well with undecided voters or suburbanites who are exhausted with his chaotic approach to governing.

Trump was “too hot,” said Scott Jennings, a top political aide in the George W. Bush White House. The president, he added, didn’t give Biden “enough room to dig the holes.”

“Trump is the biggest dog in the junkyard. He’s proved that. He’s louder, ruder and appears tougher. The job for Biden tonight was to seem strong enough to do the job and Trump took direct aim at that,” one longtime Republican strategist said. "He's a bully. But after he kicked sand in Biden's face, Biden needed to be stronger and he just wasn't."

He added, however, that Trump's dominance came at a cost. If the president was looking for ways to lose more women voters, the GOP strategist said, “He accomplished that tonight.”

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who helped Trump prep for the debate, also described the president as "too hot" for his own good.

BY LARA SELIGMAN, JACQUELINE FELDSCHER, MICHAEL STRATFORD, SAM MINTZ, CATHERINE KIM AND KATY O'DONNELL

“You come in and decide you want to be aggressive and I think that was the right thing,” Christie said on ABC. But "with all that heat, you lose the light. That potentially can be fixed. Maybe, maybe not. We will have to see.”

The theme of complete mayhem dominated the night, with Wallace castigating Trump for disregarding the guidelines of the evening.
Advertisement

“Sir, wait — you've agreed to the two minutes, so let him have it,” Wallace warned the president at one point.

And then again: “Mr. President, your campaign agreed both sides get two-minute answers. Uninterrupted. Your side agreed. Observe what your campaign agreed to.”

“He never keeps his word,” Biden interjected.

Veteran Democratic strategist Pete Giangreco called the debate a "sideways, 50-car rollover crash of a debate that will change absolutely nothing. Advantage Biden."

But he warned it was not a good look to attempt to alter any rules moving forward. “You don't win a game by complaining about the officiating. Show up and play. Joe Biden showed up.”

Biden's campaign portrayed Trump as “angry and tired,” and Biden as presidential. The campaign noted that ActBlue, the Democratic online fundraising platform, shattered a record for the most money raised in a single hour, recording $3.8 million in donations during the debate.

“Trump offered only interruptions and lies,” Bedingfield said. “Trump was desperate and weak and angry. He’s losing the race and tonight he lost his temper.”

 

Breaking: Democrat, Black and Gay, Jaime Harrison is leading on the Polls Vs. ♛Queen of the Senate Lindsey Graham ♛ who still holding hearrings, on Trump? No, Hillary..now laugh but if you are a tax payer in the U.S. YOU R paying for it.


Latest: The Commission on Presidential Debates announced Wednesday that it plans to implement changes to rules for the remaining debates, after Tuesday night's head-to-head between Joe Biden and Donald Trump was practically incoherent for most of the night.
What they are saying: "Tuesday's night debate made clear that additional structure should be added to the format of the remaining debates to ensure a more orderly discussion of the issues," the CPD said in a statement. 
  • The CPD said it would announce the new rules shortly, and that the commission "intends to ensure that additional tools to maintain order are in place for the remaining debates." 

Driving the news: The debate was chaotic, to say the least, as Trump ignored the rules and spouted a series of claims, lies and denials throughout the evening. As Axios' Mike Allen wrote: "At literally no point was there an agreed-upon baseline of facts upon which to debate policy." 

Comments