Showing posts with label Gay Human Stories. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gay Human Stories. Show all posts

April 26, 2014

Neal Gottlieb (US) Places Rainbow ohm Uganda’s Highest Peak




American Neal Gottlieb climbed Uganda’s highest peak and placed a rainbow flag at the summit to protest the enactment of an anti-gay law that further criminalizes homosexuality in the country.
In a Facebook post about his action, Gottlieb says he wrote to Uganda’s president, Yoweri Museveni, telling him, “Your country’s highest point is no longer its soil, its snow or a summit marker, but rather a gay pride flag waving brilliantly, shining down from above as a sign of protest and hope on behalf of the many thousands of Ugandans that you seek to repress and the many more that understand the hideous nature of your repressive legislation.”
He continues, “As the president of a nation you have the opportunity to be a great man and lead your country forward. Instead, you choose to hold your people back like the imperialists, the dictators and the warlords that have held Africa back generation after generation. The people that you wish to imprison are the same people who can help Uganda grow into a great nation.
“If you don’t like said flag on your highest peak,” he adds, “I urge you to climb up and take it down.”
Gottlieb’s protest has attracted both positive and negative responses. He told BuzzFeed that some people have said his action “echoes of imperialism” and could be harmful to LGBT Ugandans. Others, including Frank Mugisha, of Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG), called Gottlieb’s move a “good thing” and a show of “support and solidarity.”

March 19, 2014

Ugandan’s President Willing to Meet USA on Gay Human Rights and Treatment




‘Maybe we can reach a point of reconsideration’: John Kerry
US Secretary of State John Kerry says Uganda’s president is willing to meet with American “experts” to talk about the African country’s Anti-Homosexuality Act and the flawed reasoning used to justify its enactment.
According to BuzzFeed, which moderated a March 18 forum at the State Department, Kerry revealed that Yoweri Museveni, who signed off on the measure in February after saying he was convinced people are not born gay, “committed” to the prospective talks.
“Maybe we can reach a point of reconsideration,” Kerry suggests in reference to the Ugandan law.
But in January, before Musveni assented to the measure, he had also given a delegation from the Robert F Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights the assurance that he would reject it, calling the measure “fascist.” But he went ahead and signed off on it the following month.
Kerry notes that the approach to Museveni is part of the strategy the Obama administration is adopting in response to legislation that discriminates against LGBT people in several countries, BuzzFeed says.
Prior to his statement, the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) submitted a letter to the administration, calling for a rethink of how assistance is disbursed to countries that criminalize homosexuality.
The letter states, in part, “We are especially concerned about the enactment of draconian laws in Uganda and Nigeria in recent weeks and the effect that may have in other countries, namely Kenya [and] Malawi, where legislatures are reportedly beginning to consider similar draft laws.
“Such laws not only violate human rights, they endanger lives and undermine public health efforts, most notably programs to address HIV/AIDS, which must be conducted in a non-discriminatory manner in order to be effective.”
Among its recommendations, the caucus called for assistance to be redirected from governments that sanction discriminatory laws, toward civil society organizations; a review of organizations that have supported such laws; and for American embassies to provide protection to people threatened by anti-gay laws.
The caucus also called for the US to work jointly with the United Nations, the African Union and other relevant regional organizations to press for the repeal of anti-gay legislation and to use their influence to discourage the implementation of such measures.

February 2, 2014

Two Men Sentenced to 6 Months for Having Gay Sex


"Imagine, getting six months for having sex! I’ve known some people that in month would accumulate  alive sentence.   How we, but specially closeted gays take the liberties for which we still fight here for granted.”





Two gay men in Senegal are feeling the effects of harsh anti-gay laws in the country. According to the Associated Press on Feb. 1, a judge have sentenced the two men to six months in jail for committing "an improper or unnatural act with a person of the same sex."
It was a rare conviction but evidence that the country is serious about a penal code that calls for possible imprisonment for up to five years and fines of up to $3,000 for committing the act that has been deemed "unnatural".
The two men who were arrested after neighbors alerted police to their home, confessed to their sexual relationship in court on Friday (Jan. 31). They were then sentenced under the penal code and will be serving jail time. Although the sentencing was an example of discrimination against gays in the country, Senegalese President Macky Sall insists that gays are only prosecuted for breaking the law.
In this case, they did break the law, but the law itself has been disputed as discriminatory. Currently more than two-thirds of African countries outlaw consensual same-sex partnerships.
Back in November, five women were arrested for suspicion of violating the country's anti-gay law. Arrests have been on the rise in the Muslim-majority country since 2008

July 20, 2013

Gay Marriage a Life and Death Issue


MOLD450x450


I was reading a post of a fellow blogger because he had been elected by people that like to tittle and label people. He was elected as The “Face” of the gay male or something to that. I was surprised that he accepted being that he had a bad case of the 'writers blockage syndrome' and now he had to pen a piece and he said he could not come up with anything. This is where the rubber meets the ass-and-fork (my words) and the blockage was as acute as a bad case of hiccups. It happens to all of us particularly when we are on a deadline to write something.

The second reason I was surprised he accepted the honor is because he said he was not ‘that’ face and gave samples of what that face is. He gave the stereotypes. He is not that type because he wont be seen at pride or at a political meeting or a bar. I was surprised he didn’t mentioned high heels. He said he was none of that. He was also against  hunger, starvation, war and I guess if he had enough room he would have taken the page saying all the things he is against. He concluded the paragraph or sentence saying because he is also against gay marriage. I figure the poor man believes if you want gay marriage for your fellow gays you are pro decease, war and all the things he mentioned.  I guess the pro marriage bunch are horrible people.  Had he been in front of me ( I know what you are thinking, not true:) I would have asked in which order he is against those maladies and if ever he would be for gay marriage? He did not elaborate which left me with a sour feeling because I just spent my time reading his stuff and he leaves out the most important point of the point he was trying to make. Yes, I know "against gay marriage.” But there two types of believers or I should say non believers. The ones that don’t believe in the institution of marriage and those who believe but say that we should have gone for something more important and then come back to gay marriage when the rest of the world was ok I guess.

That is the question I have, when? So You don’t get the wrong idea of me I have never been married, currently single and come from a marriage in which I don’t understand how my mom and my father stayed together for so many years. They fought every day.  May be if I would have asked more daring questions of mom I would find out and I only asked in front of my fathers dead body once(no she did not killed him). The response was "because I loved him” but that did not answer my question. That’s for another day because I want to stay on this thought which very important. So Im not pro marriage because I think I will get married. That’s settled.

I believe that marriage is of life and death because it is here now to do it or it wont get done in this generation. Marriage is an institution supported by all governments on this earth. It makes sense that for two people that want to commit to each other would get married to open the doors to all the other rights which by the way are intertwined around marriage. Nothing like marriage to get us so many other things we want. It is the perfect conduit to get us closer. If you have a better approach to human rights I’ll listen but everything I hear is pure pie in the sky and it’s either usually said by people that are not even fighting in the trenches or people with other motives than the one their mouth are articulating wether their brains are aware of it or not.

The acceptance of us getting married and we are already seeing dividend on the people that through marriage see how we have been discriminated and abused. Marriage is like a movie in color of the past that remind people we have not been treated the same. What does the institution of driving has to do with getting a driver’s license? Nothing and everything. The car doesn’t  know it yet  you don’t have a license but it will take you there if you know how to drive. However you will end up paying a lot of money and possibly jail if you don’t get the piece of paper. I understand why you would be against the institution. I know how it started and I agree to a certain point with you. But to be treated equally isn’t it worth for you to hold your nose if you have the right partner to do this. Don’t talk to me if nobody will marry you and that’s the reason you are oppose.

For those who want other things settled before, well this is what’s on the table! This is what we cooked and we don’t know it all.  I hope you are giving away a chunk of your salary to those that don’t have it in your neighborhood or mine. I hope you don't vote for politicians that will impede embryo cell research.  I hope you get wet in politics a bit because without it, there is no health and no food.

Health problems will never be settled in our generation. As we cure one cancer we develop another by-product of some cure or the damage of our water systems with lead and thousand other carcinogens giving people brain, colon and stomach cancer to people in scary proportions . So When would it be good for you? By you lending support you help so many people that love each other and want this. If you have nothing against these gays….Can't you hold your nose? Because the human problems will always be there. We can’t stop being human just because we are going to die one day. Because it will happen and we can’t wait.

Adam Gonzalez, Publisher

March 18, 2013

Bullied to Death 14 yrs Old Ayden Olson Kills Himself

Tragic: Ayden Olson, 14, was found dead at his home yesterday Campaigner Shy Keenan's teenage son Ayden Olson was found dead at his family home in Colchester in an apparent suicide                                Eastnews
Tragic: Ayden Olson, 14, was found dead at his home Friday
The teenage son of a leading child abuse campaigner found dead at his home yesterday was “bullied to death”, his mother has claimed.
Schoolboy Ayden Olson, 14, was found dead at his family home in Colchester in an apparent suicide.
His mother, author and prominent child abuse campaigner Shy Keenan, shared the tragic news on her Twitter page and claimed her son had been tormented.
She updated her profile page with a picture of Ayden with his name, date of birth and death along with the words “Bullied to death”.
The account was updated late last night, along with a post which read: “Shy and Tim's beloved son Ayden died today age 14 - no further update at this time...”
Shy Keenan
Devastated pupils at the Philip Morant School, Colchester, were told of Ayden’s death yesterday afternoon and have been offered counselling.
Loss: Child abuse campaigner Shy Keenan says her son was "bullied to death"
Hundreds of well-wishers have flooded 49-year-old Ms Keenan’s Twitter page with tributes and messages of support.
 
Sara Payne, mother of murdered schoolgirl Sarah and fellow child abuse campaigner, told Ms Keenan: “my darling our hearts break with yours”.
Dr Payne added: “beautiful kind hearted boy with a wonderful soul”.
Actress Brooke Kinsella, who has campaigned for a clampdown on knife crime after the murder of her brother Ben, tweeted: “I am so so sorry Shy.
“I don’t know what to say apart from I am thinking of you and my heart breaks for you xxxx”.
School friend Megan Grinham posted: "RIP to the most wonderful boy Ayden. At dancing, he always made us laugh. Praying for his family."
A spokesman for the Philip Morant School said: “Our thoughts and prayers are with his family during this difficult time.
"Ayden was a much-loved pupil who brought joy to the school.
"The school community is incredibly saddened by his loss and we ask that people respect the privacy of his family and friends during these devastating circumstances.
"We would urge any student who feels overwhelms or upset to talk to someone about their feelings and seek support."
An Essex Police spokesman confirmed the teenager's death was not being treated as suspicious.
She said: "The coroner has been informed of the death and police will be conducting further routine enquiries."
Ms Keenan exposed her own stepfather as an abuser after she made an undercover film of him confessing to the catalogue of abuse.
She wrote a book about her harrowing upbringing called 'Broken' and has continued her campaigning in recent weeks.

February 18, 2013

Soros Sues Anti-Gay Pastor for "Crime Against Humanity"

 By Todd Starnes





Pastor Scott LivelyAn American pastor is facing a federal lawsuit filed by a George Soros-funded organization alleging that the pastor’s messages on homosexuality are a “crime against humanity” – a lawsuit that some Christians fear might have far-reaching consequences for church mission groups.
Scott Lively, a Massachusetts pastor known for his opposition to homosexuality, was sued by Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG). They claim that he incited the persecution of homosexuals in Uganda.
Lively traveled to Uganda in 2009 where he delivered messages that shared his Biblical views on homosexuality.
The visit coincided with that nation’s legislature considered a bill that would have imposed the death penalty for the “offense of homosexuality.”
“This is absolutely outrageous, “ Liberty Counsel founder Mathew Staver told Fox News. “If this case is not dismissed, we will be having an American pastor that lives in the United States on trial for alleged crimes against humanity. And what are those crimes? He spoke out on homosexuality.
Staver is asking the federal district court to toss out the lawsuit as a “gross attempt to use a vague international law to silence, and eventually criminalize, speech by U.S. citizens on homosexuality and moral issues.”
Free Republic Reported:
An American pastor is facing a federal lawsuit filed by a George Soros-funded organization alleging that the pastor’s messages on homosexuality are a “crime against humanity” – a lawsuit that some Christians fear might have far-reaching consequences for church mission groups.
Scott Lively, a Massachusetts pastor known for his opposition to homosexuality, was sued by Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG). They claim that he incited the persecution of homosexuals in Uganda.
Lively traveled to Uganda in 2009 where he delivered messages that shared his Biblical

July 22, 2012

HBO Documentary “Vito” Honors a Gay Civil rights Fighter

 Filmmaker Jeffrey Schwarz got some especially gratifying feedback at a recent San Francisco screening of "Vito," his documentary about late gay-rights activist and onetime Lodi resident Vito Russo.
Vito Russo became a noted gay-rights activist and writer; his book 'The Celluloid Closet,' a history of gays in film, was made into a documentary.
PHOTOS COURTESY HBO
Vito Russo became a noted gay-rights activist and writer; his book 'The Celluloid Closet,' a history of gays in film, was made into a documentary.
Russo with his late father, center, and brother Charlie, right, of Glen Rock.
Russo with his late father, center, and brother Charlie, right, of Glen Rock. 
At the time of Russo's death from AIDS in November 1990, he was a legendary figure in the gay community, known not only for his activism but for his groundbreaking 1981 book "The Celluloid Closet," which chronicled how motion pictures had portrayed homosexual characters from the 20th century on. Over time, Schwarz realized, "fewer and fewer people were aware" of who Russo was and what he'd accomplished.
"He was seminal because he was one of the first advocates for gay rights, and also, he was the first person to ever codify the depiction of gay people in movies, which put that on the map as a cultural reference point," says actor and comedy writer Bruce Vilanch, a Paterson native, who knew Russo well and is in the film.
"Vito," which has been on the festival circuit for the last nine months, features many clips from interviews with the charismatic Russo.
"I'm glad that it's gonna hit the mainstream, so that the next generation can see," says Charlie Russo, Vito's brother, a retired Lodi Middle School guidance counselor and longtime high-school athletics coach who lives with his wife, Linda, in Glen Rock. "They need to know who the trailblazers were, who fought through very difficult times to give us the rights we have today, because sometimes we take them for granted."
Russo also hopes viewers will take away from the film "that a loving and nurturing and supportive family is so important."
That Vito Russo's traditional Italian-American family was all of those things is one of the film's most poignant aspects.
"I don't want to make it sound like right from the start everybody was good with this. … But I'm glad we came to it quickly, at a time when other families were not coming to it," Russo says. "My dad was a construction worker, so there was a homophobic environment that he worked in, and he was also a third degree member of the Knights of Columbus [a Catholic organization]. … He had all these pressures of everybody telling him to reject his son, and yet, the love of his son trumped all of them. And it really empowered Vito, because he knew that whatever he did out there, he could always come home and have unconditional love."
The Russo brothers were polar opposites – Charlie, younger by three years, was captain of the football, basketball and baseball teams in high school, while Vito couldn't get enough of the movies – but they had a great relationship.
"There's an old saying, 'To know him is to love him,' " Russo says. "If you met him, you fell in love with him."
The family moved from East Harlem to Lodi in 1961. And, according to the film, Vito Russo did not exactly love living in New Jersey. As soon as he turned 18, the Lodi High School graduate (class of '63) moved back to New York City. "It's very simple. He wanted to be where the action was, and he wanted to be part of theater and around performers," his brother says. "It wasn't so much that he didn't like Jersey."
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, even in Manhattan, Schwarz says, "it was very unusual and avant-garde for people to be out of the closet, and Vito was out, fully, completely out – to his family, to his friends, in his workplace. He wanted to show to the world that you could be out, and the sky wasn't gonna fall on you."
He became involved with the gay-rights movement shortly after the Stonewall riots of June 28, 1969, and became a member of the Gay Activists Alliance (GAA), and later, a founding member of ACT UP and GLAAD, which gives annual media awards.
"He was very concerned about how we were being portrayed in the culture, because movies shape the way we feel about pretty much everything," says Schwarz, who never met Russo but read "The Celluloid Closet" in the early 1990s, when he was in film school and "just coming out." His first movie job was as an apprentice on the award-winning 1995 documentary based on Russo's book.
"In that period of time [that Russo studied in the book], we were depicted as psychopathic villains or comic relief – the quote unquote 'sissy' characters. And gay or lesbian characters usually killed themselves at the end of the film."
Says Vilanch, "He was fascinated by this idea that the movies depicted gay people as tragic characters and that that was part of the reason that gay people saw themselves as tragic characters."
"Vito" also shows how in the early 1980s the virus that would soon be labeled AIDS quickly spread through the gay community, as the Reagan administration dragged its heels in addressing, or even acknowledging, the epidemic. After Russo's diagnosis in 1985, Schwarz says, "he put himself out there as almost a poster child for a person living with AIDS." As his mother, Anne Russo, wrote in a letter to the editor published in The Record a week after her 44-year-old "adored son" died, he "fought to the very end for the quicker release of any medicine that would help save lives."
"Vito" will make its HBO debut on the sixth anniversary of Anne Russo's death. Russo's father, Charlie, died the previous year.
Brother Charlie Russo, who has seen "Vito" seven or eight times, says watching it is an emotional rollercoaster ride that takes him from sadness to anger to pride about his brother's accomplishments and impact.
"Some of the issues that he was talking about and fighting 40 years ago are front-page stories today. He fought bullying, he fought for same-sex marriages, he fought for health care," Russo says. "He was such a visionary. … There's a great line in the movie where he says, 'What I'm doing now, I'm doing for future generations so that the kids of the next generation don't have to go through what we went through.' That's such a key line."
Email: rohan@northjersey.com
 
THE RECORD


Love And Pride Sale! Up to 70% OFF on Selected Products Buy Now! Special offers and sales for all products! Up to 70% off, Free Shipping! Buy Now!||||

June 15, 2012

Cameron in 5th } A Fighter of Censorship } A Fighter For Equality


201206_gayspeech.jpg 
Kameron Slade, giving his speech for the cameras (NY1).
Another day, another story of censorship by a New York City public school principal—and this one is about a hot button issue, not a pop song. According to Queens fifth-grader Kameron Slade, a speech he wrote about same-sex marriage was deemed inappropriate by the principal of his school, PS 195.
"I was really looking forward to it," Kameron told NY1 of the chance to read his speech to his whole school. "I thought that this was a real good winning speech for tomorrow." And it y'know what? It is a winning speech. Though it may have been deemed too risque for kids—despite discussing that very idea—you can watch the whole adorable thing right here. It's good!
Slade wrote the speech with his mom after he won a class competition and was supposed to read it to his school this week. But on Wednesday his principal reportedly said "he should write another speech or be removed from the contest." Apparently the topic of gay marriage, which is hard to avoid in the real world these days, was too much for the innocent children of Queens. And some parents at the school seem to agree: "I think they are a little too young to hear about this," one told the news channel.
Apparently the Department of Education is rethinking the decision, though. A rep "told NY1 Thursday night that Kameron will be permitted to give the speech Monday in some sort of a different assembly." We've reached out to PS 195 for comment on the disturbing decision but have yet to hear back. Meanwhile, on the bright side, Slade's speech now has a chance to reach a far-wider audience. Did we mention the whole speech is available for you to watch here?

February 7, 2012

Dirty Harry has turned against the GOP


MSNBC host Chris Hayes, appearing on The Rachel Maddow Show. Screenshot via MSNBC.
Dirty Harry has turned against the GOP.   (By Stephen C. Webster)
That’s basically the message in last night’s episode of The Rachel Maddow Show, during which guest host Chris Hayes examined the popular Chrysler Super Bowl ad featuring Oscar-winning director Clint Eastwood.
His conclusion: Eastwood’s sideways endorsement of the auto bailouts punches conservatives where it hurts — right in the Reagan.

President Ronald Reagan loved Eastwood and his Dirty Harry image, and even occasionally dropped Eastwood’s most famous movie lines in public. That’s because Eastwood’s popular tough-guy image played right into the Republican narrative that they were coming to reassert American strength after President Jimmy Carter had so “emasculated” the presidency.

Eastwood was even in an anti-drug commercial featuring Nancy Reagan, and did a number of other anti-drug spots on the Reagan administration’s behalf.
But now that Eastwood is singing a different tune, and praising one of President Barack Obama’s policies on an issue where his likely Republican challenger goes in the exact opposite direction,conservatives have been sent reeling.
“If you doubt the potential effectiveness of this message, if you doubt its political potency, all you have to do is look at the conservative backlash against the Clint Eastwood ad today,” Hayes said.
rawstory.com/ 
The advertisement which stole the show during Super Bowl... with actor Clint Eastwood.
Talking point … Clint Eastwood denies his two-minute ad has a political message. ''It's about American spirit, pride and job growth.''
THE most talked-about advertisement of the Super Bowl did not have a supermodel, a cute puppy or a smart-aleck baby. It was a cinematic, two-minute spot featuring Clint Eastwood, an icon of American brawn, likening Chrysler's comeback to the country's economic revival.
And within 12 hours of airing, it became one of the loudest flashpoints yet in the early re-election campaign of the President, Barack Obama.
Conservative critics saw the ad as political payback and accused the car maker of handing Mr Obama a prime-time megaphone in front of one of the largest television audiences of the year. 



December 26, 2011

Quiet Dissent about The Salvation Army } Would there Ever be a Peace between Them Vs. Us?

 
Stephen Crowley/The New York Times
Bil Browning organized a boycott of the Salvation Army kettles and thrift stores because of the organization's views on homosexuality.


 “The Salvation Army refused to help us,” Mr. Browning recalls, “unless we broke up and then left the ‘sinful homosexual lifestyle’ behind. We slept on the street, and they didn’t help when we declined to break up at their insistence.”

Bil Browning and his boyfriend were homeless. To protect the identity of the boyfriend (now ex-boyfriend), Mr. Browning will not say specifically where, just that it was in “southern Indiana,” about 20 years ago. But he is very explicit about who refused to give them shelter.
Mr. Browning’s boyfriend was wearing a “Silence = Death” AIDS pin on his jacket, which must have tipped off the Salvation Army worker. “He told us we needed to be saved,” Mr. Browning says. “If we were willing to attend church services, he could help. We would have to break up, only one of us could stay in the shelter, and if there was room for the other, he would have to be on the opposite side of the room, and we wouldn’t even look at each other.”
Now Mr. Browning, a writer and gay rights advocate, is using his blog to publicize a decade-old boycott of the Salvation Army. The boycott’s proponents say those who drop money into the Salvation Army’s ubiquitous red kettles at Christmastime, or shop in its thrift stores, often know little about the organization’s evangelical Christianity, its opposition to homosexuality, and its occasional attempts to influence public policy on gay rights.
On his Web site, Mr. Browning, whom the Christian magazine World recently called “the Red Kettle Menace,” encourages people to donate instead to other organizations, like the Red Cross or Doctors without Borders. When he passes by the red kettles, he sometimes drops in pieces of imitation money that he says have circulated among gay activists for about 10 years.
One version of the money looks like a real dollar bill, but its (obviously fake) denomination is three dollars, it carries a rainbow flag, and it bears the words, in small print: “When the Salvation Army ends its policy of religious bigotry and discrimination against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people, then, and only then, will this be a real dollar bill.”
Greg Henchar, a Floridian who with his partner runs Rainbow411.com, a gay-friendly business directory, says he created the $3 bill a year ago. The blogger John Aravosis has published on his Web site a similar piece of red-kettle literature — he does not know who created it — that says “Voucher” across the top and begins, “This holiday season I am supporting organizations that do not discriminate in any way.” And about a dozen YouTube videos promote a Salvation Army boycott; the most popular, posted over a year ago, has been watched over 100,000 times.
The Salvation Army originated in a series of revival meetings led by the Methodist preacher William Booth in 1865, in the East End of London. Booth left the institutional church because he believed it did too little for the poor. Today, the Salvation Army operates in 122 countries, offering services including drug and alcohol rehabilitation, shelters and soup kitchens. Although Salvation Army missions lack many trappings of Christian churches — they do not offer communion, for example — they house nondenominational worship services, and their treatment programs rely on the Bible.
The Salvation Army’s “Position Statement” on homosexuality, found on its Web site, reads in part: “The Salvation Army does not consider same-sex orientation blameworthy in itself. Homosexual conduct, like heterosexual conduct, requires individual responsibility and must be guided by the light of scriptural teaching. Scripture forbids sexual intimacy between members of the same sex. The Salvation Army believes, therefore, that Christians whose sexual orientation is primarily or exclusively same-sex are called upon to embrace celibacy as a way of life.”
The Salvation Army does not employ registered lobbyists, but its leaders have occasionally made news by meeting with government officials. In 2001, The Washington Post obtained a Salvation Army document that said the administration of President George W. Bush had promised to honor a Salvation Army request: that religious charities receiving federal money be exempt from local gay antidiscrimination laws. The day the request became public, the Bush administration said it was being denied.
And in 2004, in response to a City Council ordinance requiring that organizations with city contracts offer benefits to gay employees’ partners, the Salvation Army threatened to stop operating in New York City. In 2006, the New York State Court of Appeals ruled that Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg did not have to enforce the ordinance, which had been enacted over his veto; the Salvation Army never left New York City.
George Hood, a Salvation Army spokesman, said all revenue from Salvation Army thrift stores is used locally. But he said a small percentage of money dropped into the red kettles finds its way to Washington — where it helps to pay the salaries of politically active staff members like Mr. Hood. Every local unit pays 10 percent of its revenue to a state or regional division — there are 40 divisions in the United States — and every division pays 10 percent of its revenue to one of four national territories, each of which foots a quarter of the national budget.
In other words, of a dollar dropped into a red kettle in New York City, a quarter of a penny ends up at national headquarters, where conversations with the government — not lobbying, Mr. Hood says — may take place.
Despite the boycott, the red kettles have had three straight record years for fund-raising, Mr. Hood says. As to the complaint of discrimination based on sexual orientation, he says it is against Salvation Army policy. “If they were legitimate clients looking for food, they should have been helped,” he says of Mr. Browning and his ex-boyfriend.
In a statement sent by e-mail later, Mr. Hood adds that “gay couples are to be treated in the same way we treat heterosexual couples.”
“Whether they are provided overnight lodging,” he says, “is determined solely on capacity and availability of beds.” Most beds in Salvation Army shelters are for men, but the Salvation Army has “been going through a transition of facilities over the past several years to expand bed space for women and also to isolate some private rooms for couples, whether they be homosexual or heterosexual.”

Twitter/markopp1;
markoppenheimer.com





Amazon SearchBox Use it for All Meerchandise

The Forest Needs help

Summer Athlete

Adamfoxie Blog Int.

Adamfoxie Blog Int.
Amazon

ONE

ONE
Relief World Hunger

Taylor Made 2016 Family Clubs

Click Here To Get Anything by Amazon- That will keep US Going

Amazon EcHo

Blog Archive/White No# Stories per Month/year

Popular Posts

Everyday at the Movies

Orangutans ARE Part of the Forest

The Gay Man in You♥ or Him