January 11, 2012

Justin Bieber Says Would like to Enjoy Sex } But if He could Only Stand Straight

 
JUSTIN Bieber thinks he will be “more into making love” when he gets older.
The Baby hitmaker — who is currently dating singer Selena Gomez — believes turning 18 in March will not change him as a person, but thinks the things he sings about currently will change as he develops.
“I’m not going to try to conform to what people want me to be or go out there and start partying, have people see me with alcohol. I want to do it at my own pace,” he said.
“I don’t want to start singing about things like sex, drugs and swearing. I’m into love, and maybe I’ll get more into making love when I’m older. But I want to be someone who is respected by everybody.”
The Canadian star also admits he expects to one day be the “best” in the business but thinks he still has much to learn.
“I want to be successful and be great at what I do. But eventually, I want to become the best at what I do,” he added.
“I want to be better than anybody who’s ever done it. And in order to do that, I need to strive to be the best, be good to people and treat people with respect, and work as hard as I can. Because for me, I work so hard and this consumes my life — it’s not worth it if I’m not the best. I’m still learning.”





As the World Evolves so Would Homophobia to be under Control or Extinguished } Peter Thatchell

Peter Tatchell questions what equality means for the future of gay and straight labels
In most parts of the world, homophobia is in decline. The global trend is for the repeal of anti-gay laws and for greater public understanding and acceptance of sexual difference. Overall, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people are gradually gaining respect and rights – not losing them.
There are, of course, frightening examples of intensified homophobic repression in parts of Africa and the Middle East. But taking the long view, in world historical terms, anti-gay attitudes and laws are on the wane.
This begs the question:
As homophobia diminishes and as future societies eventually embrace a post-homophobic culture, how will this transition to equality, dignity, understanding and acceptance affect the expression of sexuality?
If human civilisation evolves into a state of sexual enlightenment, where the differences between hetero and homo no longer matter, what would this mean for the future of same-sex desire and same-sex identity?
We already know, thanks to a host of sex surveys, that bisexuality is a fact of life and that even in narrow-minded, homophobic cultures, many people have a sexuality that is, to varying degrees, capable of both heterosexual and homosexual attraction.
It is also apparent that same-sex relations flourish, albeit often temporarily, in single-sex institutions like schools, prisons and the armed forces – which suggests that sexuality might be more flexible than many people assume.
Research by Dr Alfred Kinsey in the USA during the 1940s was the first major statistical evidence that gay and straight are not watertight, irreconcilable and mutually exclusive sexual orientations. He found that human sexuality is, in fact, a continuum of desires and behaviours, ranging from exclusive heterosexuality to exclusive homosexuality. A substantial proportion of the population shares an amalgam of same-sex and opposite-sex feelings – even if they do not act on them.
In Sexual Behaviour In The Human Male (1948), Kinsey recorded that 13% of the men he surveyed were either mostly or exclusively homosexual for at least three years between the ages of 16 and 55. Twenty-five per cent had more than incidental gay reactions or experience, amounting to clear and continuing same-sex desires. Altogether, 37% of the men Kinsey questioned had experienced sex with other males to the point of orgasm, and half had experienced mental attraction or erotic arousal towards other men (often transient and not physically expressed).
Kinsey’s statistics on same-sex behaviour have since been criticised as out-of-date, exaggerated and unrepresentative. However, his idea of a spectrum of human sexuality has tended to be reinforced by subsequent surveys which have shown that a significant proportion of the population have had sexual relations with both men and women.
British sex survey, conducted by ICM for The Observer newspaper in 2008, found that 16% of women reported sexual contact with a woman, and 10% of men said they’d had sexual contact with another man. The survey revealed a trend to greater sexual experimentation, with 23% of 16 to 24 year olds indicating that they had a same-sex experience. All these figures are much higher than the number of people who are exclusively gay or lesbian and who define themselves as such.
The possibility that individuals can share a capacity for both hetero and homo behaviour is an idea that was researched and documented by the anthropologists Clellan Ford and Frank Beach.
In Patterns of Sexual Behaviour (1965), they noted that certain forms of homosexuality were considered normal and acceptable in 49 (nearly two-thirds) of 76 tribal societies surveyed from the 1920s to the 1950s. They also recorded that in some aboriginal cultures, such as the Keraki and Sambia peoples of Papua New Guinea, all young men entered into a same-sex relationship with an unmarried male warrior, sometimes lasting several years, as part of their rites of passage to manhood. Once completed, they ceased all homosexual contact and assumed sexual desires for women. If sexual orientation was totally biologically pre-programmed at birth, these men would have never been able to switch to homosexuality and then to heterosexuality with such apparent ease.
This led Ford and Beach to deduce that homosexuality is fundamental to the human species, and that its practice is substantially influenced by social mores and cultural expectations.
The evidence from these two research disciplines – sociology and anthropology – is that the incidence and form of heterosexuality and homosexuality is not fixed and universal, and that the two sexual orientations are not mutually exclusive. There is a good deal of fluidity and overlap.
What’s more, although scientific evidence shows that human sexuality is significantly affected by biological predispositions – such as genes and hormones – other influences appear to be cultural, including social expectations, peer pressure and the availability and opportunity for sexual release. These influences channel erotic impulses in certain directions and not others. An individual’s sexual orientation is thus influenced culturally, as well as biologically.
As culture changes, perhaps manifestations of sexuality can also change?
The evidence of considerable cross-over between gay and straight relations comes from research that records consciously recognised and admitted desires. At the level of unconscious feelings – where passions are often repressed, displaced, sublimated, projected and transferred – it seems probable that very few people are 100 percent straight or gay. Most are a mixture, even if they never mentally acknowledge or physically express both sides of the sexual equation.
This picture of human sexuality is much more complex, diverse and blurred than the traditional simplistic binary image of hetero and homo, so loved by straight moralists and – equally significantly – by many lesbians and gay men.
If sexual orientation has a culturally-influenced element of indeterminacy and flexibility, then the present forms of homosexuality and heterosexuality are conditional. They are unlikely to remain the same in perpetuity. As culture changes, so will expressions of sexuality.
In a future non-homophobic society, as the taboos concerning same-sex relations recede, more people are likely to have gay sex – even if only experimentally or for a few years.
Interestingly, the demise of homophobia is likely to make redundant the need to assert and affirm gayness.
Gay and lesbian identities are largely the product of homophobic prejudice and repression. They are a self-defence mechanism against homophobia. Faced with persecution for having same-sex relations, the right to have those relationships has to be defended – hence gay identity and the gay rights movement.
But if one sexuality is not privileged over another, defining oneself as gay (or straight) will cease to be necessary and have no social relevance or significance. The need to maintain sexual differences, boundaries and identities disappears with the demise of straight supremacism.
As we evolve into a sexually enlightened and accepting society, homosexuality and heterosexuality will begin to fade as separate, exclusive orientations and identities.
The vast majority of people will be open to the possibility of both opposite-sex and same-sex desires, regardless of whether they act upon them. They won’t feel the need to label themselves (or others) as gay or straight because, in a future non-homophobic civilisation, no one will care who loves who. Love will transcend sexual orientation.
This article originally appeared in the Huffington Post UK.
For more information about Peter Tatchell’s human rights and social justice campaigns, visit www.petertatchell.net 





Channing Tatum on The Detailssssss Interview



PHOTOGRAPHS BY NORMAN JEAN ROY


Channing Tatum’s previous cover for Details magazine must’ve sold really well. The 31-year-old actor was once again asked back, this time to grace the publication’s February 2012 issue. I don’t know where Tatum found the time to pose for photographer Norman Jean Roy. He sure is one busy boy as of late. Channing can currently be seen in “Haywire” and has four films coming soon to theaters. “The Vow“, “21 Jump Street“, “G.I. Joe: Retaliation” and “Magic Mike” are all scheduled for release in 2012.
Personally, I can’t wait to see all of them but G.I. Joe. The one I’m looking forward to the most is “Magic Mike“. The film is loosely based on his experience as a male exotic dancer from his younger days. Even though director Steven Soderbergh wanted full frontal nudity from his hunky male actors, sadly I don’t think that’s going to happen. The film was just given a Hard R Rating which probably just means butt shots and lots of abs. Not a bad consolation prize.
For his latest Details appearance, Channing talked about all his upcoming film projects and future goals in Hollywood. He also discussed his marriage to actress Jenna Dewan among other things. Check out a few pictures and quotes from Details editorial piece below.

Why He Chooses Certain Film Projects

“You gotta do the Dear Johns. You gotta do The Vow. I’m conscious about why I did those parts, those movies. I wanted to learn from Rachel on The Vow. I wanted to learn from Lasse Hallstrom on Dear John – he did The Cider House Rules and What’s Eating Gilbert Grape. I didn’t go to acting school, so my knowledge of story, filmmaking, and character comes from just being on set and doing it. I know I’m not the best actor, but I hope my characters are getting better.”

Future Plans

“I really don’t want to be in any more movies that I don’t produce. Unless it’s with one of the 10 directors that I really want to work with, I don’t have any interest in not being on the ground floor of creating it. But what I really want to do is direct.”
The Interview:


"Want to do something fun?" Channing Tatum asks. "It's probably not fun. It's probably kind of sadistic. We're going to play a little Russian roulette." Tatum is holding a .44 Magnum: a silver-barreled world-ender with a scuffed black butt and a tendency to misfire. We've already shot 399 bullets in a concrete box of a shooting range, just off the Grand Army of the Republic Highway in Burbank—and, yes, there's just one slug remaining.
It's been an hour since Tatum, 31, cocked the Magnum's hammer the first time. We'd already finished up with a smaller HK pistol and a reasonably intimidating .357. By comparison, the .44 feels frightening and lethal—a tumescent revolver snorting fire and huffing its flinty breath into our faces every time we pull the trigger. Tatum warns me about the dangers of "going bitch on the gun," which is to say letting the gun make a bitch out of me. Then he proceeds to rip apart a tennis ball with a shot. "Oh shit! Oh shit! Oh shit!" he stammers—incredulously, ecstatically. His eyes roll back in his head. He squeals, grins, and purses his lips.
"When I was a kid," he says, "we lived on the bayou in Mississippi. My dad would throw a beer can into the water and have me shoot at it. Once, when I was really little, we had this huge double-barrel shotgun, and when I tried it, it literally blew me off the dock."
Full disclosure: We're shooting under the influence. Two hours earlier, Tatum picked me up in a black Town Car chauffeured by a kind-eyed Ghanaian named Collins, greeting me with a Global Bro Hug, slapping me twice on the back. Once inside the Lincoln, Tatum took a swig of Knob Creek from a half-full bottle he pulled from a suede messenger bag. "Maybe you shouldn't tell anyone we're drinking and shooting," he said, not serious in the least. After wiping the bottle's lip with his sleeve cuff, he passed it to me. "There goes Jesus," Tatum said as we rolled along Sunset. And there He was in the crosswalk—latte in hand, robe flowing in His wake, fluttering across Fairfax Avenue. "I'd walk around in a man dress," Tatum said. "It looks so comfortable. I'd do that all day long—walk around in a dress like Jesus." Tatum's 1957 Chevy pickup wasn't an option today, nor was the Corvette I'd been given thanks to a magnificent screwup at the LAX Avis. Tatum's publicist wanted us driven, not driving. "I'd rather not see you guys get a DUI," she said. "I hate to be a mom here, but I am a mom, so I can't help it."
Better maternal advice might have been Don't drink and shoot. Nevertheless, here we are alone at the range, with Channing Tatum loading what Dirty Harry calls the world's most powerful handgun, himself loaded with several shots of bourbon. And now he's talking about blowing our brains out? He adjusts his goggles and the noise blockers capping his ears. Dressed in a heavy flannel shirt draped loosely over a gray tee and baggy jeans tucked into high-top Chuck Taylors, he lifts the weighty Magnum, mocking a biceps curl. "That'll be us," he says, pointing the barrel at neither his nor my head but instead at a 17.5-by-23-inch orange-and-white human-silhouette target we bought for 75 cents at the front desk.
"I'm gonna load and spin," Tatum says. "I'm gonna fire." Hundreds of copper casings glint around his feet. Through the window into the lobby, we can see a corpse being autopsied on an old TV. Tatum extends his arms, sets his legs, and aims at the silhouette's head. He exhales. Pulls the trigger. Nothing.
We go on like this, taking turns, holding breath, closing eyes, curling fingers around the steel-comma trigger. Exhaling. It's a sick game and one that Tatum is playing with surprising seriousness. He's darker, deeper, more creative than his easygoing manner—and most of his roles—might suggest. These days, when he's not attempting mock suicide, he spends a lot of time sculpting torsos from clay and drawing severe oil-stick sketches on butcher paper.
"I'm still here after four rounds," Tatum says, placing the gun on a ledge. His mood elevates every time the Magnum fails to fire. This is more than a game to him—it's a life-affirming exercise. "Let's each take one more shot," he says, flashing a goofy grin. "If the gun doesn't go off, we'll just live forever."
•••

All simulations aside, Channing Tatum is a man who pulls the trigger with little hesitation. At 19, he was working as a stripper in Tampa and living in a government housing unit. Twelve years on, he has five movies coming out in the first six months of the year, including his first feature as a producer. The only way you get to this point is by never being gun-shy. By always saying yes. It might result in playing an eighties street tough in a beautiful indie like A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints. Or in becoming the backbone of a bankable dance franchise like Step Up. Maybe you will emerge the proven face of a summer blockbuster like G.I. Joe, or as the male ideal as envisaged not by Michelangelo but by Nicholas Sparks (Dear John).
"You gotta do the Dear Johns," Tatum says."You gotta do The Vow." He's talking about this month's installment of Channing Tatum Will Crush Your Aorta With His Eyes, His Abs, and His Unbelievable Propensity to Stand by Your Side Through Anything, Always, No Matter What. It's not officially a Nicholas Sparks movie, but it may as well be. Plot: Tatum's wife, played by Rachel McAdams, loses her memory after being propelled, slo-mo, Nine Inch Nails-video-style, through a windshield. Tatum is then charged with the hero's quest of making her remember everything, making her . . . love him again. It's based on a true story, so Happy Valentine's Day from all your friends in the neuropsych ward.
"I'm conscious about why I did those parts, those movies," Tatum says after jokingly apologizing for my having had to watch them. He says he took the roles for the sake of his education, which is, of course, an industry trope. But it's one he delivers with such sincerity that it's impossible not to absolutely take him at his word. "I wanted to learn from Rachel on The Vow," he says. "I wanted to learn from Lasse Hallström on Dear John—he did The Cider House Rules and What's Eating Gilbert Grape. I didn't go to acting school, so my knowledge of story, filmmaking, and character comes from just being on set and doing it." We have another Knob Creek moment, merging onto the Hollywood Freeway, heading for Burbank. "I know I'm not the best actor," he says. "But I hope my characters are getting better."


Next month's 21 Jump Street, a comedic reboot of Johnny Depp's star-making 1980s TV series, holds some proof that they are. Yet there's a thoughtfulness about Tatum that remains untapped onscreen. And through all those wounded-soldier flicks, he hasn't really had a chance to display one of his core characteristics: Channing Tatum is damn funny. Had it not been for Jonah Hill, Tatum's Jump Street costar—and one of the film's producers—we'd have had to wait a little longer to see this side of him. The duo play fuck-up cops taken off their beat and reassigned to go undercover in their old high school. Tatum is surprisingly hilarious in the part and the perfect foil to Hill. "The studio wanted another traditional comedy person," Hill says, "the kind I always work with. But from Day 1, I wanted Chan. I needed somebody who looked like an action guy, but with real vulnerability that would make you care about his character. I called him up, not even knowing him, and he just said yes on the phone. That never happens. I'm in awe of the guy. I don't want to sound like a broken record, but Chan's the best."
Tatum has found another champion in Steven Soderbergh, who directed him in Haywire. Though his special-ops role in the film, released last month, is only a small one (the movie belongs to the furious fists and feet of MMA fighter turned actress Gina Carano), he and Soderbergh connected on a big idea. "Chan immediately struck me as somebody bright and attentive," Soderbergh says. "I knew he had a production company and was starting to develop things." In particular, Tatum and his production partner, the writer Reid Carolin, had started to shop Magic Mike, an ensemble comedy, scheduled for a summer release, based on Tatum's time as a stripper.
After taking one more swig of bourbon (his third), Tatum dispenses another tried-and-true Young Hollywood Maxim. "I really don't want to be in any more movies that I don't produce," he says. "Unless it's with one of the 10 directors that I really want to work with, I don't have any interest in not being on the ground floor of creating it." Every actor and actress under the age of 35 seems to say some version of this, regardless of intention or meaning. It's the new "But what I really want to do is direct." Still, with Tatum, you actually believe it, primarily because he's talking about movie production the same way he's talked about how he framed houses, sold mortgages, and danced on stage, peeling off a Boy Scout uniform. Tatum speaks like a man who understands and values work, which makes him utterly inept as a bullshitter. His pitch really isn't even about making it in Hollywood. It's about how to live as a self-actualized man.
Last year, on the set of Haywire, Soderbergh recalls, he asked Tatum, "What kind of stuff are you developing?" Tatum told him about his stripper screenplay in the pipeline, and the director went right for it. "It's one of the best ideas I've ever heard," Soderbergh says. "So I say to Chan, 'What's going on with that?' And he goes, 'Well, we got somebody working on it with us.' We finished up Haywire and then he called me—it would have been in March or April—and he goes, 'Look, it's an open assignment now, we don't have a director. Do you still want it? Do you still think this is a good idea?' I said, 'Not only do I think it's a good idea, but we've gotta do it right now, so let's go. Let's start, today.'"
Then, before Tatum can really tell me more about his production company, Iron Horse Entertainment, and its work on Magic Mike, we see a woman pushing a car down an exit ramp. We're just beyond Bob Hope Airport, near where the Verdugo Mountains start to rise. The woman is fortysomething and leaning hard into her bumper, trying to make her broken-down Toyota Camry move. We're obviously going to stop.
"The car's smoking," Tatum says. "Maybe it's on fire."
And with that, he's out the door, running across the road toward the stalled vehicle. "Oh, man," the woman says. She's on the verge of tears. Her grandson, a cornrowed toddler named Wallace III, is in the back seat, and she's worried the car might explode. "Let's get the kid out of there," Tatum says, which is probably something he's said in a movie. She agrees. "Sean," she says. "I'm Sean. You know, like Sean Puffy Combs."
Tatum's there for a good 15 minutes, getting under the hood, poking at hoses, pulling on dipsticks, and iPhoning Siri to find us a tow truck before the woman realizes she's seen this flannel-clad Samaritan before. "Wait," she says. "You're ummm . . . that's ummm . . . and you came out to help?"
To her, Channing Tatum, a.k.a. "Ummm," is simply the celebrity most likely to show up out of the blue and fix her Toyota. "Ummm," she says. "Ummm, you think you can get this sucker to start up again for me?" Tatum and Collins do their best. While our driver is more mechanically inclined, Tatum is excellent in an emergency. He's in the driver's seat testing the ignition. He's getting a smile out of Wallace III. He's pouring water into a tank beside the engine block. He's hugging Sean. "I wish I could say I'm good with cars," he says as Collins finally solves the problem.
A replacement hose is needed, but the vehicle is now in good enough shape for Sean to steer it to the nearest service station. "I just put all my money into the gas tank," she says, hands on her hips. "I can't pay for a new hose." Reflexively, Tatum takes her aside and presses a $100 bill, or maybe two, into her palm. "Get it fixed," he tells her. "Go fix it now. Don't get stuck out here again. Take it slow. Put on your flashers."
•••

Before heading over to the Iron Horse offices, and with our hands reeking of gunpowder, we stop off at Tatum's house in Laurel Canyon, which he shares with his wife, the actress Jenna Dewan. It smells like scented candles. Flowers are everywhere. Lemons and limes grow on trees in the yard. The story is that the plot of land belonged to Charlie Chaplin. After all that Russian roulette, it's heartening to see so much vibrant proof of life. Dewan, whom he met while filming Step Up in Baltimore seven years ago and with whom he's lived ever since, greets us, smiling, at the door. "Hi, little face," Tatum tells her, planting a kiss on her lips. The couple's pit bull, Lulu, comes bounding up behind them.
 

"Want to see dirty dancing?" Tatum asks. Lulu trots over to the far side of the patio. When Tatum snaps his fingers and commands "Dirty dancing," the muscled pooch—in her rhinestone-studded pink leather collar—charges toward him. She leaps high into his arms, and he thrusts her upward until she's suspended over his head in a balletic lift. Then the two twirl around, poolside, illuminated by twinkle lights. "You jumped the gun," Tatum says to the dog. "We'll do it over." Which they do, again and again.
And then we're back in the Town Car, Collins taking us over to Iron Horse Entertainment—adjacent to one of Hollywood's seediest hotels. It has a great American literary name but looks like something off the streets of Baghdad. The light pouring from its window is a diseased, piss-colored shade of yellow. "This is the kind of place," Tatum says, "where you'd walk in and AIDS would just jump all over you. It's mostly transients and addicts in there." But, still, he's more comfortable in its shadows than at the Chateau Marmont or the Sunset Tower.
Tatum's office has 25-foot-high ceilings, a desk made from the wing of an old airplane, and an enormous chalkboard with ideas and stories blocked out all over it. A couple of leather saddles sit on sawhorses near the door. Tatum says he's often there until 4 a.m., brainstorming or writing snippets of scenes or making clay torsos. "Jenna's not always happy when I come home that late," he says, "but I've just got to get it out."
Reid Carolin, Tatum's partner in the endeavor—the two met while shooting Kimberly Peirce's Stop-Loss—is sitting at the airplane desk, where he worked on Magic Mike. Tatum provided the context and many of the stories, but the script is Carolin's. "To clarify," Tatum says, "it's not really my story. It's really about that world: the people and the decisions you have to make. It's not as dark as you might think. Soderbergh really had a clear vision as far as not making it overly sexual, overly dark." The director predicts the name Channing Tatum is about to become an indelible one. "He has a lot of the qualities I associate with people like George and Matt and Brad in terms of being clear-eyed, hardworking, and masculine. He's a man. I wish there was a better word, but in movie terms, he's a man, he comes across on the screen as a man," Soderbergh says. While Magic Mike isn't exactly Boogie Nights, it figures to launch Tatum on a very Wahlberg-esque trajectory: picking choice roles while amassing cred as a producer. He's already shown some savvy, landing Soderbergh and assembling the ensemble cast that includes Alex Pettyfer, Matt Bomer, and Matthew McConaughey.
"This is where people smoke crack," says Tatum, walking me out the back door. "This is where people do heroin. Reid walked out here once and there was this guy with a spike in his arm." Tatum shrugs and adjusts his Houston Astros cap, backward and low on his forehead. "Whatever," he says, grinning. "I like it here. Should we go get more drinks?"
Two Woodford Reserve bourbons go down fast at the Blue Boar bar around the corner, where the bartender greets Tatum with a fist bump. Half an hour later, Tatum orders two shots of Bulleit whiskey to cap our bullet-filled day. "What are we toasting?" I ask. He looks up and meets me dead in the eye. "Isn't it obvious?" he says. "We're just getting started with our lives, just figuring out the rest of it. The creativity is in place, the sex is good. There's really only one toast to make." Tatum lifts the glass as high as he lifted his dog. "Live forever," he says. "Just live like this forever."







“One Life to Live” Guys which ends its 40-year run this week

 By Greg Hernandez  
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_lviO2mEbYgM/SB3nO_cvbqI/AAAAAAAAAuU/vaFAhCUKUqE/s400/vlcsnap-27157.jpgAfter more than 40 years, the ABC soap One Life to Live is going off of the air.
It is a pity.
The show has featured some of the hottest men in all of daytime and Greg In Hollywood will be featuring some of them as Morning Men this week.
Today, the spotlight is onTuc Watkins who is the wickedly funny David Vickers, David A. Gregorywho plays the hunky Robert Ford and Michael Eastonwho portrays Llanview Chief of Police John McBain.

http://0.tqn.com/d/onelifetolive/1/0/M/d/2/john15.jpg
http://images.zap2it.com/images/celeb-45350/michael-easton-2.jpg
http://www.malecelebnews.com/wp-content/images/2011/08/Happy-birthday-David-A-Gregory-turns-26-today-01.jpg






Equality Marriage } It’s Coming to New Jersey With A GOP Governor


New Jersey Democrats plan to introduce a new gay marriage bill at the upcoming legislative session, and say they have the votes to pass it in both houses, unlike in 2010, when the State Senate voted down the measure. "Marriage equality represents the third leg of the stool of civil rights and equality in this country," said Assembly Speaker Shelia Oliver at a news conference yesterday. Even if the bill passes, there's another hurdle ahead, as Governor Chris Christie has said in the past that he will veto a law supporting same-sex marriage.
"I am not a fan of same-sex marriage," said Christie last year. "That's my view and that'll be the view of our state, because I wouldn't sign a bill like the one that was in New York." Civil unions have been allowed in New Jersey since 2003.
An editorial in the New Jersey Star-Ledger today said the bill "is not likely to succeed while Christie remains in office," but proposed bypassing Christie by amending the state constitution, a "risky" proposition but one "worth a try as a last resort."
But Democrats are poised to fight for marriage, The Wall Street Journalreports, "hoping to distinguish themselves ideologically from a GOP governor they have cut numerous deals with." The Journal foresees potential influence from New York, which passed a marriage-equality bill last year:
An unanswered question is whether Republican-leaning hedge-fund managers who gave more than $1 million to a pro-gay marriage lobbying effort in New York would take up the cause in New Jersey. Their money helped turn the tide in New York, giving political coverage to Republicans who control the state Senate. A number of those financiers are strong allies of Mr. Christie, including Paul Singer and Daniel S. Loeb, both of whom urged him to run for president last year. They didn't return calls for comment.
The president of Garden State Equality also sees New York's influence through Governor Andrew Cuomo. "You might call it the Andrew Cuomotization of legislators in New Jersey," he told the Star-Ledger. "Andrew Cuomo has set the stage for the legislature in New Jersey and in other states, by championing the cause of marriage equality not begrudgingly but with gusto. And that's happening in New Jersey now." 
An opponent from the New Jersey Family Policy Council said, "I don't think this is a slam dunk. There's going to be quite a battle." We're looking forward to it.






Twitter and Google are Hitting Each other on the Ba###



computertwitter-afp
By Reuters
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Twitter lashed out at changes Google Inc unveiled for its search engine on Tuesday, describing the changes as “bad” for consumers and for Web publishers.
Twitter, a microblogging service which allows its users to broadcast short, 140-character messages to groups of “followers,” said Google’s changes would make it tougher for people to find the breaking news often shared by users of its service.
“As we’ve seen time and time again, news breaks first on Twitter; as a result, Twitter accounts and Tweets are often the most relevant (search) results,” the company said in a statement.
“We’re concerned that as a result of Google’s changes, finding this information will be much harder for everyone. We think that’s bad for people, publishers, news organizations and Twitter users,” the statement continued.
Twitter’s criticism, which came hours after Google announced new features aimed at making search results more personalized, underscored the growing competition between the Web companies. And it comes at a time when Google is facing antitrust scrutiny for favoring its own services within its search results.
A Twitter spokesperson declined to answer a question about whether the company might reach out to antitrust regulators about Google’s changes.
Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A 2009 agreement, allowing Google to offer a real-time feed of Twitter messages within its search results, expired in July.
Google launched a social network, dubbed Google+, in June that offers many of the capabilities available in Twitter and in Facebook.
With Tuesday’s changes to Google’s search engine, photos and posts from Google+ will increasingly appear within the search results.
The changes effectively create customized search results for people who are logged in to Google. A person who searches for the term “Hawaii,” for example, might find private photos that their friends have shared on Google+ as well as public information about the islands.
Twitter General Counsel Alex Macgillivray, a former Google attorney, said in a Tweet on Tuesday that Google’s changes “warped” Web search and represented a “bad day for the Internet.”
(Reporting by Alexei Oreskovic)
(Twitter lashed out at changes Google Inc unveiled for its search engine on Tuesday, describing the changes as "bad" for consumers and for Web publishers.
Twitter, a microblogging service which allows its users to broadcast short, 140-character messages to groups of "followers," said Google's changes would make it tougher for people to find the breaking news often shared by users of its service.
"As we've seen time and time again, news breaks first on Twitter; as a result, Twitter accounts and Tweets are often the most relevant (search) results," the company said in a statement.
"We're concerned that as a result of Google's changes, finding this information will be much harder for everyone. We think that's bad for people, publishers, news organizations and Twitter users," the statement continued.
Twitter's criticism, which came hours after Google announced new features aimed at making search results more personalized, underscored the growing competition between the Web companies. And it comes at a time when Google is facing antitrust scrutiny for favoring its own services within its search results.
A Twitter spokesperson declined to answer a question about whether the company might reach out to antitrust regulators about Google's changes.
Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A 2009 agreement, allowing Google to offer a real-time feed of Twitter messages within its search results, expired in July.
Google launched a social network, dubbed Google+, in June that offers many of the capabilities available in Twitter and in Facebook.
With Tuesday's changes to Google's search engine, photos and posts from Google+ will increasingly appear within the search results.
The changes effectively create customized search results for people who are logged in to Google. A person who searches for the term "Hawaii," for example, might find private photos that their friends have shared on Google+ as well as public information about the islands.
Twitter General Counsel Alex Macgillivray, a former Google attorney, said in a Tweet on Tuesday that Google's changes "warped" Web search and represented a "bad day for the Internet.”)
(Reporting by Alexei Oreskovic)





SEARCH This BLOG

Loading...

Amazon SearchBox/ Most Things You buy through here will give us a few cents

Popular Posts

The Forest Needs help

ONE

ONE
Relief World Hunger

Save The Lungs of The Earth

Orangutans ARE Part of the Forest

Love is Sharing

Pride Shack

Gay Male Pride Items #1 (Vertical Banner)

Click Here To Get Anything by Amazon- That will keep US Going

Young Love Collection

CDC

SiGn ThE PeTiTiOn

DVD's

HIV Army

Blog Archive