November 11, 2011

He was a little boy on “Jerry Maguires” Jonathan Lipnicki Grew Up } Will Make any Gay Man Smile and He knows and Shows it here


D'you know that the human head weighs 8 pounds?
D'you know how much a human head weighs when a muscle-y 21-year-old guy sits on it?
We ask only because this ab-tastic little creature (and we feel a little dirty as we type that) is none other than sweet little Jonathan Lipnicki from the Tom Cruise— "You complete me..."— movie Jerry Maguire.
WHAT? When did he grow up? And grow THAT body? And... and... WHAT?
Sexy site DListed.com popped up with these photos on Monday (November 7th). They got them from the Oh No They Didn't! blog, which in turn got them from a Jonathan Lipnicki UK fan forum. Because such a thing DOES exist, evidently. After all that searching we couldn't find what the photos are from, why they're so homo-erotic, and what the little sparky stud is doing right now for work. But we are 
happy they exist. Check them out, and find a link to more.

Posted at schubertsays.com 

George Stephanopoulos{See Vid} Interviews Victim #1 {He Was 11} On Penn Boys Sex Abuse Scandal

 by Colby Hall 
The son in question first met Jerry Sandusky when he was just 11 years old. Shortly after, the son became very close to the former Defensive Coordinator, spending nights at his home and even leaving school with Sandusky, despite the child’s mother not knowing of his absence. When asked when she first suspected something was wrong with the relationship, the mother said that when her son started acting out, she went to his school counselors, only to be told that it was likely “a puberty thing.”

Since details of Penn State’s horrific child rape scandal emerged in a grand jury report released earlier this week, few of the known participants have submitted themselves to an interview with the press. That changed this morning when Good Morning America anchor George Stephanopoulossat down with the mother of an alleged victim, identified in the report as “victim #1.” With her voice and image altered to protect her identity, the mother explained how her son came to reveal the reprehensible allegations at the center of this story.
When prompted by Stephanopoulos, she then shared how her son revealed to her how she wanted to look up “sex weirdos”:
I asked him who he was looking up and he wanted to see if Jerry was on there and I said, well, why would you look him up? And he said, I don’t know. He’s a weirdo. And I preceded to ask him if there was something he needed to tell me. And at that point, he didn’t indicate anything. I called the school and expressed my concerns. I told them to pull my son down to the guidance office and talk to him. and they did. at that point, they called me and said it was very important that I get there immediately. at that point, i already had suspicions. I kind of knew what it was about.
According to Stephanopoulos, what saddens and angers her the most, is the number of people who seemed to know something was going on but didn’t call police, including coach Joe Paterno, and agrees with the Board of Trustees decision to fire the legendary coach, saying “if he had any inclination of this, and he legally needed to do what he needed to do,” adding”yes, I think they all needed to be gone.”
For his part, Stephanopoulos ably navigated a potentially uncomfortable interview, which was wisely cut into a rather markedly edited segment for broadcast. This made for a more clear and meaningful presentation of a complex and ugly story.
Watch it below, courtesy of ABC News:

Homosexual Couples in Cuba Would Like To Be Counted




A shield in front of a fasces crowned by the Phrygian Cap, all supported by an oak branch and a laurel wreath





Dalia Acosta
 HAVANA TIMES  (IPS) — Communist Party and gay rights activist, journalist and blogger Francisco Rodríguez has triggered an online debate in Cuba by calling for sexual diversity to be identified in the next census, due in September 2012. Better known by the name of his blog, Paquito el de Cuba, Rodríguez has urged the national statistics office, ONEI, to follow the lead of other countries that have begun to identify same-sex couples and families in the 2010 round of global censuses approved by the United Nations. 
“Gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) people must demand that our families are counted in the census – the largest piece of social research conducted by any given country – notwithstanding the fact that our laws still do not recognize any form of legal union for same-sex couples,” he posted on his blog Monday Nov. 7.
If this happens, Cuba would join countries like Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Italy, the United States and Venezuela which, in their separate ways, have incorporated questions related to sexual diversity in their national censuses.
“Those who wish to be recognized as the real families they are, including the possibility that these couples may be raising the biological children of one or both partners, should be given the opportunity to do so,” Rodríguez told IPS in an e-mail.
The journalist acknowledged that the point of such a decision would not be to assess the number of same-sex couples, which would be under-reported because of the invisibility that “surrounds these couples as a result ofcultural homophobia,” as well as other problems facing people living together, such as the housing shortage.
However, he said, “there are many family models that are not socially recognized, that the census could help to count and describe,” to raise awareness about sexual diversity and to contribute key information when political and legislative decisions are made that affect these population groups.
“Paquito’s” latest post began to circulate immediately through social networks like Facebook, and was forwarded to e-mail contact lists and through personal communications on the island by people defending sexual rights as human rights.
It also provoked reactions from people whose outlook remains influenced by the “machista” culture, and who regard heterosexuality as the only acceptable option.
In his blog post, Rodríguez said he had access to a letter from Mariela Castro, head of the state National Sex Education Centre (CENESEX), asking ONEI to consider including questions in the census to help identify the different kinds of families.
Earlier, Malú Cano of CENESEX’s Red Trans, a network of transvestite and transgender people, had raised the need to include gender identity in the country’s statistics. “What is nameless does not exist. And we do exist,” said Cano at the Second National Meeting of Transgender Promoters of Sexual Health in mid 2011.
One argument against the proposal is that the pilot trial for the next census was already held last September, to test the methodology that will be used by some 69,000 census takers, mostly volunteer students and teachers in technical and university education.
Rather than delay implementation of the proposal until the next census a decade away, a national survey to gain a broader specific view of sexual minorities could be carried out, but this would require additional resources and political will.
In any case, the proposal by CENESEX and activists like Rodríguez rests on the draft document for discussion at the January 2012 national conference of the governing Cuban Communist Party, which affirms the need to overcome prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of gender and sexual orientation.
“It makes sense to me that if a country wants to know about the social and demographic features of its population, it should take measures to collect reliable statistics. In this case, same-sex couples are a feature just like any other, for instance the number of heterosexual couples living together,” Rogelio Manuel Díaz told IPS.
Díaz, a nuclear physicist and the author of the blog Bubusopia, holds the view that this course of action would allow the 2012 census to “reflect reality, rather than an imaginary picture that would inevitably ignore, exclude and certainly discriminate against part of the population.”
According to Rodríguez, who writes for the trade union weekly Trabajadores, if same-sex couples and families were included in the census, it would be an important tool to persuade parliament to approve a bill recognizing equal rights for heterosexual and homosexual couples.
It would also be a key step towards enacting a Gender Identity Law with the aim of guaranteeing full social inclusion for transgender persons.
Yasmín Silvia Portales, a feminist and supporter of the rights of people with different sexual orientations and gender identities, told IPS that “one of the excuses used to justify denying GLBT groups their full rights, and failing to admit that they are victims of discrimination, is that there are so few of us.
“The census is a good opportunity to explode this myth. GLBT people are out there, looking after children and elderly people, living together, getting divorced, studying or working or being supported by our partners,” said Portales, who writes the blog En 2310 y 8225.

FBI director J. Edgar Hoover is portrayed as a deeply closeted homosexual in a new biopic


 

The gay G-man
Keith Bernstein/Warner Bros. Entertainment
J. Edgar Hoover was the most powerful man in America for almost half a century. The first director of the FBI, he held the post until his death in 1972, serving the bureau and its predecessor under eight U.S. presidents, from FDR to Richard Nixon. No one dared fire him: he was the Man Who Knew Too Much. When Robert F. Kennedy was his boss, Hoover not only bugged his private elevator but slowed it down to make the conversations last longer. He spied on the extramarital affairs of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr., and for conspiracy theorists connecting the dots between their assassinations, he was the ultimate bogeyman. Yet Hoover, who pioneered fingerprint databases and modern forensics, was also America’s prototypical crime fighter, the original poster boy for Hollywood’s macho legend of the G-man.
But in J. Edgar, a biopic directed by Clint Eastwood, the “G” could stand for gay. Leonardo DiCaprio portrays Hoover as a deeply closeted homosexual. It’s a fact that he was a lifelong bachelor who lived with his mother, and that Clyde Tolson, his associate director at the FBI, was his closest companion—they shared everything, from daily lunches and dinners to vacations, until the day Hoover died. Yet almost four decades later, the FBI still denies its founding father was gay, and the J. Edgar Hoover Foundation begged Eastwood not to portray him as such. Clint didn’t listen. But then Hollywood’s most iconic tough guy was directing a script by gay rights crusader Dustin Lance Black, who won the Oscar for Milk, and was on a mission to drag Hoover out of the closet.
“I certainly concluded he was not straight,” says Black, who conducted exhaustive research. “There are first-hand accounts from women who were very interested in him, the stars of the day,” he told Maclean’s, citing Dorothy Lamour and Ginger Rogers, who are both portrayed in the film. “If he tried to perform sexually, it did not go well. And Hoover’s collection of photos of Clyde sleeping rings a bit gay to me. We know that they showed up to work together in the morning and went home together in the evening. This was long before carpooling was in fashion.”
The camera never shows Hoover engaged in a sexual act. But Tolson (Armie Hammer) does force a savage kiss on him during a physical fight on a hotel room floor. And while the film doesn’t depict Hoover as a flamboyant cross-dresser, after the death of his domineering mother (Judi Dench) we see him alone in her bedroom, slipping on one of her dresses—a moment of secret reverie that carries a faint frisson of Psycho.
“He was certainly not flamboyant,” says Black, “and if you look into the cross-dressing claims, they fall apart very quickly.” Asked if he thinks Hoover and Tolson actually had sex, the writer says, “I’m not sure. I debated this for some time. But to me, it didn’t matter. For today’s generation, being gay isn’t a sexual act. It’s part of your nature. If I went further, it would be conjecture.” What intrigued Black is how Hoover’s ambition replaced a love he was afraid to acknowledge. “He understood the power of secrets. He knew his secret would ruin him. So he collected secrets on other people, including gays and lesbians.” The film, in fact, shows him getting a big kick out of a lesbian love letter from Eleanor Roosevelt.
Black says Eastwood didn’t want to change a word of his script. “But he asked me hundreds and hundreds of questions. He’d be up in Carmel and he’d catch me in L.A., driving around. He wanted to make sure everything was based in fact, and sourced. But he never asked about the love story. To him, that was just understood.”
Tolson’s character is clearly more open about his sexuality, an attitude that Hammer portrays less with words than with a sly look, from the moment of his initial job interview in Hoover’s office. “He even put on his application to the FBI: ‘I’m not interested in women.’ That’s as bold as you could be in the 1920s,” Hammer told Maclean’s. “It’s pretty much code for ‘I’m gay.’ ” I found a third grade yearbook photo of him wearing a bow tie, pocket square and watch fob. This guy knew from day one! J. Edgar was much more conflicted.”
The film shows Hoover under intense pressure to keep his sexuality under wraps. It all seems to stem from his mother, portrayed by Dench as a kind of Lady Macbeth, who grooms him to be important, famous—and straight. “I’d rather have a dead son than a daffodil for a son,” she says with withering disdain. Hoover pursues power and celebrity via a contrived persona that would shatter if his secret ever got out. He would brandish a machine gun for a photo op at a gangster’s arrest, stealing the credit from his FBI agents who nabbed the culprit. And, waging a war for hearts and minds, he forces Hollywood studios to stop glamorizing crime bosses like John Dillinger and make heroes of G-men instead. His picture lands on cereal boxes.
Tolson comes across as a devoted yet unrequited lover. In that sense, J. Edgar is like a sexless Brokeback Mountain. Although Tolson and Hoover share adjoining hotel rooms rather than a tent, like Brokeback’s cowboys they quarrel over the closeted partner’s failure to commit, until they’re wrestling in a blue rage. Hammer recalls that Eastwood, 81, actually got down on the floor to demonstrate: “He put on a faux fight with Buddy Van Horn, his stunt guy who has been with him since Rawhide. Those two guys had a full-on, knock-down drag-em-out to show what he wanted.”
Most of the time, however, Eastwood would sit back and let the actors figure out their scenes, says Hammer. “You’d say, ‘Where do you want us to stand?’ He’d say, ‘Anywhere you like.’ He wouldn’t say anything about the characters or the acting. But there was one scene we did twice and the third time Clint said, ‘Alright we’re getting a little gay-eyed. Let’s back up the looks and try this again.’ ” Hammer says Eastwood’s laid-back style is “diametrically opposed” to that of David Fincher, who directed him in The Social Network. Fincher is notorious for his endless takes, and “it’s gruelling because you have to keep up with him,” says Hammer, “whereas with Clint, he’s so good at what he does and he’s been doing it for so long, he’s been able to simplify it. It’s effortless excellence.”
But Eastwood’s unassuming style also mutes the tone of the film, and softens the drama. There’s a pedestrian efficiency to J. Edgar, which does not quite measure up to the epic dimensions of its subject, despite a powerful performance by DiCaprio (a clear Oscar contender) and some finely nuanced work from Hammer. The women don’t fare as well. Dench’s icy matriarch is a mere sketch. And Naomi Watts is stuck in a starchy role as thankless as that of her character, Hoover’s devoted lifelong secretary, Helen Gandy, who spins an unsuccessful date with Hoover into a career.
With a relatively lean budget of US$35 million—DiCaprio took just 10 per cent of his usual $20-million fee—J. Edgar strains to cover a lot of ground, using a flashback structure to frame his entire career. Mountains of latex are required to age the characters. While skimming through Hoover’s G-man publicity stunts, his anti-Communist witch hunt, and his persecution of King, Black chose to hinge the narrative on Hoover’s handling of the famous Lindbergh case—the 1932 abduction and murder of aviator Charles Lindbergh’s 20-month-old son.
An apolitical crime that serves to enhance the nascent heroism of the young bureau director, it’s an odd choice. When you combine that with the film’s sensitivity to a man estranged from his sexuality and terrorized by his mother, what emerges is a surprisingly empathetic portrait. So did Black not worry the film might soften the image of a man who instigated the Red Scare, trampled civil rights, blackmailed Martin Luther King, Jr., and conducted surveillance as if he were running a police state?
“Yes, I did worry about that,” says the 37-year-old screenwriter. “And I wanted to make sure I held him accountable for some of the heinous things he did. But some of the biographies I read were purely negative. You never understand him; he’s just a monster, and it’s not helpful. How do we prevent a promising young man from becoming this dark figure obsessed with fame and admiration and power? In this day and age, if you ask people what they want to do, their number one answer is to be famous. That was Hoover’s number one answer.” Then Black adds: “I hope this is a cautionary tale that says: don’t let your kids grow up to be Hoovers. If they happen to love someone of the same sex, don’t beat them down and leave their heart empty.”

Oh Elmira } In Elmira, NY Man Contends on Trial “ Not Murder, Because He Was Not Ready For Sex with Another Man"


 By John Zick

Louis Duffy, 20, of Horseheads, has been charged with murdering Clinton "Billy" Lewis, 53, of Elmira.

 
Elmira, N.Y. —
The May killing of a gay nightclub owner in Elmira was manslaughter, not murder, because the killer acted under the influence of extreme emotional disturbance, one of the perpetrator’s attorneys told a jury Thursday.

Chemung County Public Defender Scott Fierro admitted his client, 21-year-old Louis Duffy, shot and killed 53-year-old Clinton “Billy” Lewis after the two had a sexual encounter May 1 at Lewis’ apartment. But, Fierro contends, Duffy’s mental state prohibited him from forming the necessary intent to commit murder.

During his opening statements in Chemung County Court, Fierro told jurors that Duffy was not “mentally or emotionally” ready for a sexual encounter with a man. He said Duffy, of Horseheads, grew up in a home where homosexuality was not tolerated, and Duffy was struggling with the fact he may be gay. The attorney added that Duffy created a “male power fantasy” to shield himself.

“This whole case is about Duffy not wanting to deal with the reality of who he is,” Fierro told jurors.

Fierro said Duffy’s mental anguish was compounded by his insecurity and a statement Lewis allegedly made after the encounter.

“(Lewis) said, ‘Oh, yes, this is going to happen again. You’re mine now,’” Fierro told jurors.

In his opening statements, Chief Assistant District Attorney John Thweatt told the jury that Duffy was guilty of murder. He implied that Duffy’s motive was embarrassment.

“Billy Lewis’ life wasn’t as important as keeping his little secret a secret,” Thweatt said.

The night of the alleged murder, Duffy went to stay with Lewis because the pair planned to go to Lewis’ lakehouse the next day. Duffy was going to help with unspecified construction projects, Thweatt said.

“He didn’t pack any construction tools, (but) he was very careful to pack his murder tools,” Thweatt said, noting that Duffy brought a handgun with him to Lewis’ apartment.

Before the killing, Duffy and Lewis stopped for a drink at Lewis’ bar, Club Chill. Next, the pair went across the street to Lewis’ North Main Street apartment, where they had consensual sex, Thweatt said.

After the encounter, Duffy shot Lewis in the head, Thweatt said.

“This was murder, not manslaughter,” Thweatt said.

After Thursday morning’s opening statements, Judge Peter Buckley adjourned the trial until 9 a.m. Monday.

Tax Court Rules For Transgender Person in Tax Deduction For Medical

  The Internal Revenue Service isn’t going to fight people any longer who want to deduct the cost of gender reassignment surgery from their taxes.

According to a so-called acquiescence filed earlier this month, IRS officials notified the Tax Court that it would abide by a 2010 decision that held that some medical expenses from such surgeries could be deducted. It also ends the nearly decade-long battle that Rhiannon O’Donnabhain, who was born male and fathered three children, waged against the IRS to deduct $5,000 in expenses she incurred to bring her anatomy in line with her gender identity. The IRS at first denied her request claiming the procedure was entirely cosmetic.
 O’Donnabhain’s victory highlights the struggle that people with Gender Identification Disorders face as they undergo the long, painful and potentially costly treatment to contour the bodies that they were born with into what they think they ought to be. Each year more than 1,000 people undergo the surgery, which costs tens of thousands of dollars and often isn’t covered by insurance, according to the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.
“There is something to be said when a federal court recognizes general identity disorder as a serious medical condition,” says Karen Loewy, an attorney with Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, the non-profit that represented O’Donnabhain, in an interview. The IRS is saying that it’s going to do what the Tax Court tells them to do, Loewy says.
The case was not a complete victory for O’Donnabhain. Her request to deduct expenses for her breast augmentation were not allowed because it was directed at improving her appearance and not to treat disease as construed by the tax code.
Anthony Infanti, a University of Pittsburgh law professor who followed the case, tells TIME Moneyland that the court didn’t explicitly rule that out for future cases. “It was more fact-specific to that situation,” he says.
The Tax Court’s panel of judges could hardly be accused of bending over backwards to accommodate O’Donnabhain. Even in his concurring opinion, Tax Court Judge Mark V. Holmes lamented that making gender identity disorder a tax-deductible medical expense drafts “our court into culture wars in which tax lawyers have heretofore claimed noncombatant status.”
And some of the court’s language disturbed Infanti.  “It clearly showed how political tax law can be,” he said.  “Some of the dissenting opinions were clearly hostile to the taxpayer.”
O’Donnabhain told the Tax Court that she first remembered being uncomfortable with her male gender at the age of 10. As her discomfort grew in adolescence, she secretly dressed in women’s clothing. O’Donnabhain later married but got divorced in 1996. She had the surgery in 2002 and was audited by the IRS in 2003. The case wound its way through IRS bureaucracy until 2006 when the lawsuit was filed.
Since the legal battle started, O’Donnabhain, who is retired, has moved on with her life and recently celebrated the wedding of one of her children. The IRS decision gave O’Donnabhain a “sense of closure,” Lowey said.
“From the beginning it was not about the money,” she said.  “She just wanted fair and equitable treatment.”
http://moneyland.time.com 
 

Locking Eyes With a Stranger at McDonald PK [Boston] Can Get U Handcuffs and not in The good Way



by Maria Cramer  
On a cool August evening, a man was walking on a paved path through the Medford section of Torbert Macdonald Park when he locked eyes with a stranger. The man, a computer technician who is gay, believed that the look suggested that the stranger wanted sex, according to gay-rights advocates.
But the stranger was an undercover state trooper, who arrested the technician - not for a sex crime, but for trespassing - after he wandered 50 feet off the path, according to a police report.
State Police arrested 31 men at the park this past summer, most of them for trespassing, reviving fears in the gay community that the police were once again targeting gay men. The sexual orientation of most of the men is unknown, but their arrests prompted gay-rights advocates to meet recently with high-ranking public safety officials in Governor Deval Patrick’s administration.
“There is some concern whether or not the State Police are up to old tactics,’’ said Amanda Escamilla, a victim advocate with Fenway Health’s violence recovery program, who attended the meeting on Nov. 4. “There is reasonable belief that it could be happening again, and, if it is, we want to make sure that it stops.’’
In 1989, State Police agreed to stop using undercover officers as decoys to crack down on alleged sexual activity between men at highway rest stops, according to a Globe report at the time.
But police officials say the recent work at the Medford park did not target any one group. Their overall goal, they say, was to maintain safety in state-owned parks and protect delicate grounds, which have been damaged by people veering off main paths to use drugs or engage in sex.
Officials at the state Department of Conservation and Recreation said that “men who have sex with men’’ go off main paths at the Middlesex Fells Reservation to have trysts, trampling on natural resources, according to a draft of the department’s resource management plan.
The language rankles advocates, who said it unfairly blames one group of people. DCR officials said they would revise the language in the plan’s final draft.
Karen Wells - undersecretary of law enforcement for the Executive Office of Public Safety, which oversees the State Police - said troopers are prohibited from targeting specific groups of people.
“I’m very comfortable from the top down that [police] are treating these types of cases appropriately,’’ she said. “I’m also confident that they’re not sending troopers out as decoys.’’
Wells organized the Nov. 4 meeting after hearing concerns from advocates.
“I think it takes a little time to figure out what’s really going on here,’’ said Bruce Bell, who runs the legal information line at the Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders and who attended the meeting. “The issue is, are [troopers] really just there to kind of make eye contact and find out more about the person, or are there police who are trying to get people to think, ‘I’m gay, and I want to go have sex off trail with you,’ and encourage the person to go off the trail?’’
The technician, who is also a gay rights activist, alerted GLAD after his arrest and said he had learned of other gay men arrested under similar circumstances at Macdonald Park, said Donald Gorton, chairman of the Anti-Violence Project of Massachusetts.
Advocates have not independently corroborated his allegations.
Throughout history, gay people have relied on furtive glances to communicate sexual interest because to proposition aloud could lead to arrest for solicitation or assault from homophobes, Gorton said.
The use of plainclothes officers could, no matter what the intention, lead to disparate treatment of gay men, Gorton said.
“We’re the ones who those law enforcement tactics fall on most heavily,’’ he said.
The plainclothes officers are members of a unit that focuses on a variety of transgressions, including drug use or illegal swimming at reservoirs, said State Police spokesman David Procopio.
The unit began sending uniformed troopers to Macdonald Park following complaints from residents, including one married couple who reported in March that two men emerged from the woods acting suspiciously, said Procopio.
Plainclothes police, which included one female trooper, were deployed after a woman reported she had been raped there in June, he said. That crime remains unsolved.
People were arrested for trespassing after troopers saw them veer off paths in violation of posted signs, Procopio said. There were no arrests for illicit sexual activity.
Civil rights lawyers and police generally agree that engaging in sex outdoors is not illegal, as long as couples are out of public view.
Procopio said that the sexual orientation of the men arrested is unknown because it does not factor into the decision to arrest.
“I want to make very clear that we were not focusing on sexual activity,’’ he said. “We fully respect the rights of everyone to use that park. All we ask is that anyone who use it do so lawfully.’’
Wells said she did not believe that troopers at the park were told to make eye contact, but she said that eye contact is an essential component of detecting suspicious behavior.
She said she would be open to training troopers on that issue, but plainclothes police will probably continue to patrol the park.
Advocates and officials said they plan to meet again next week in hope of reaching common ground. At the last meeting, advocates met the State Police lieutenant who acts as liaison to the gay community and were encouraged to contact her directly.
“I feel now that if I do get a complaint that I do have a place where I can go,’’ Bell said. “They will listen.’’
Maria Cramer can be reached at mcramer@globe.com.

George Michael Goes Bunkers Over Storyline Between Two Gay Guys } Eastenders in UK

by   pinknews.co.uk  


George Michael heavily criticized the storyline between two gay character in the soap opera Eastenders.
The musician took to Twitter last night to tell followers the BBC drama was “scaring the shit out of children”.
He said “The relationship between Sayed [sic] and Christian is the most insulting piece of bullshit on British television right now.
“Insulting to the gay community, insulting to the Muslim community, and in the meantime, terrifying every gay child that is struggling to come to terms with their sexuality , and the prospect of coming out to their family, whatever their religion.
“So far, Christian has been beaten up 3 times that I can remember, and is now accused of child molestation. Sayed [sic] has been disowned and is now mistreating his partner shamelessly, presumably because he is now a confused bisexual after all.
“Total fucking bullshit.”
EastEnders' depiction Christian and Syed's

Michael described modern soap operas as being hugely influential in society, with a power to positively reflect “race and integration”.
He praised the actors, John Partridge and Marc Elliott who portray an openly gay man and a Muslim who struggled to come to terms with his sexuality, eventually leaving his wife.
At the local boxing club, 15-year-old Ben Mitchell, played by Joshua Pascoe, confides to Partridge’s character that he is gay.
The younger character’s feelings initiate the storyline referenced by George Michael.
The star continued: “Life in London is a wonderful thing for so many gay and lesbian people these days, and I know that there are gay people involved in the writing of the show but they really need to rethink their approach to gay ‘issues’. They are scaring the shit out of children everywhere.”
He concluded by saying that he hoped for the sakes of the actors and for “the sake of gay kids in this country, regardless of their cultural background, that Eastenders gets a clue and begins to acknowledge their responsibility and provides us with gay characters that have no reason to live in fear. We do exist.”

SEARCH This BLOG

Loading...

Amazon SearchBox/ Most Things You buy through here will give us a few cents

Popular Posts

The Forest Needs help

ONE

ONE
Relief World Hunger

Save The Lungs of The Earth

Orangutans ARE Part of the Forest

Love is Sharing

Pride Shack

Gay Male Pride Items #1 (Vertical Banner)

Click Here To Get Anything by Amazon- That will keep US Going

Young Love Collection

CDC

SiGn ThE PeTiTiOn

DVD's

HIV Army

Blog Archive