September 3, 2011

Cher Defends Chaz Bono like a Chita for her cubs

Posted by LGBT Weekly  BY RUTH FINE, SAN DIEGO 
In wake of Chaz Bono’s appearance on the ever-popular ABC hit “Dancing with the Stars,” Cher has stepped up to his defense via Twitter amidst “vicious attacks” on blogs on message boards.
Bono, who has famously documented his sexual reassignment surgery on the Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN), has garnered criticism over his appointment to DWTS, due in part to unfair discrimination since he is a transgendered person.
“Mothers don’t stop Getting angry with stupid bigots who (mess) with their children!” Cher posted.
Good Morning America announced Wednesday that Bono would be paired up with crowd-favorite Lacey Schwimmer, where Bono will learn a series of ballroom dances for the ultimate chance at a reality TV win.
Bono expressed excitement over his new post at DWTS, exclaiming, “I’m the luckiest guy around!” on his Twitter page.
“Thanks for all your support mom,” he wrote. “The haters are just motivating me to work harder and stay on DWTS as long as I possibly can.”

Duncan Hunter(RCA) Wants New bill to Make Homophobes of Military


Duncan Hunter - LGBT Weekly
Duncan Hunter, 2nd generation Congressman.
Posted by LGBT Weekly


The official repeal of the military’s discriminatory ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy is a few short weeks away, but Republican Duncan Hunter (R-CA) is on a mission to halt its efforts. In past attempts, Hunter has said the military “isn’t the YMCA” and has also insisted that homophobia should be a defendable right for servicemembers.
Now, Hunter’s latest efforts include the ‘Don’t Pressure Me!’ bill which aims to invariably amend the repeal of DADT through its own legal language:
To amend Public Law 111-321 (Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010) to require that… members of the Armed Forces are not pressured to approve of another person’s sexual conduct if that sexual conduct is contrary to the personal principles of the members.
The law, in other words, propels the agenda for homophobia. As ThinkProgressputs it, “such a policy would negatively impact unit cohesion, making it difficult for commanding officers to resolve disputes and putting LGBT servicemembers at greater risk for abuse and discrimination. It’s unclear how a policy of ‘not pressuring’ would even be enforced.”
Such a law would inevitably be discriminatory against LGBT servicemembers if passed

Mean, Ordinary, Selfish and just plain wrong Mr. Eric Cantor


salon.com

(Coincidentally, the hotel was the first at which I ever stayed in New York City alone, also during my teenage years. The student rate back then was $12 a night.)
Fearing high winds, in parts of the hotel they weren't placing guests above the tenth floor. We had a small room, on the third floor away from the street, so little chance of windows blowing in, which was good, facing the airshaft, which was bad. One look out the window and we quickly drew the shades; it looked like the place where pigeons go to die – or at least throw their trash. Maybe the storm would give it a good wash.
It didn't. Irene weakened as it reached Coney Island and we slept right through the main action, finally returning to my place early Sunday afternoon. Branches and leaves littered the streets and trees were down by a nearby playground. Plenty of rain and wind but nothing like the loss of life, power outages and billions worth of wind and flood damage inflicted outside the city. Beyond the media centers of New York and Washington, where reporters were quick to judge the storm "not so bad," there was more than enough disaster to go around, bringing misery to millions.
I remembered Hurricane/Tropical Storm Agnes in June 1972. It roared through central Virginia and Pennsylvania up into the Finger Lakes region of upstate New York, creating more damage than any hurricane in the United States before it. (That time, Agnes hit DC with a vengeance -- more than a foot of rain in parts of the area and 16 deaths as people were swept away in the floodwaters. I was there, and will never forget the usually placid Rock Creek roiling like Colorado River rapids. The Potomac overflowed into the C & O Canal, and a crowd of us stood in Georgetown watching the water slowly creep up lower Wisconsin Avenue.)
Fresh water from Agnes' floods flushed into the saltwater of Chesapeake Bay, damaging the seafood industry there for years, and the damage inflicted on the tracks of already financially crippled railways in the Northeast helped lead to the creation of the federally funded Conrail freight system (later divided into CSX and the Norfolk Southern Railway).
Storms like Agnes and Irene are insidious, often striking slowly over time in ways that can be unpredictable and far more damaging than anticipated. Government preparedness and response are critical. There was no Federal Emergency Management Agency in 1972; in fact, like Conrail, its origins can be traced, in part, to the Agnes disaster. Jimmy Carter signed it into creation seven years later. Since then, FEMA has had noteworthy ups and downs, performing reasonably well when those who believe in the value of government are in power, suffering lamely when they're not.
By all accounts, and at this writing, the White House, FEMA and other government agencies, including state and local, have acquitted themselves ably during the lead-up to Irene, the actual hurricane and its aftermath, although many remain in need. Eighteen FEMA teams were positioned along Irene's path from Florida to Maine, spreading north as the storm proceeded toward New England, providing support, supplies and experienced advice all along the way.
As even The Washington Post's resident smartass Dana Milbank had to admit, "Don't expect anybody to throw a tea party, but Big Government finally got one right… a rare reminder that the federal government can still do great things, after all other possibilities have been exhausted."
However, he continued, "Americans won't have long to savor this new competence in government. NOAA [National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration] has already been hit with budget cuts that will diminish its ability to track storms, and FEMA, like much of the federal government, will lose about a third of its funding over the next decade if Tea Party Republicans have their way…
"Tea Partyers who denounce Big Government seem to have an abstract notion that government spending means welfare programs and bloated bureaucracies. Almost certainly they aren't thinking about hurricane tracking and pre-positioning of FEMA supplies. But if they succeed in paring the government, some of these Tea Partyers (particularly those on the coasts or on the tornadic plains) may be surprised to discover that they have turned a Hurricane Irene government back into a Katrina government."
Cuts have been approved by the House Appropriations Committee to the program that sends "hurricane hunter" aircraft into storms to measure data crucial for hurricane forecasts. Weather satellites are on the chopping block, too. At a May press conference, NOAA administrator Jane Lubchenco warned, "The future funding for our satellite program is very much in limbo right now… We are likely looking at a period of time a few years down the road where we will not be able to do severe storm warnings and long-term weather forecasts that people have come to expect today."
She noted that cutbacks had forced the agency to delay the launch of a much-needed satellite. As per NPR's Jon Hamilton, "It would have traveled in a polar orbit, beaming down information for weather and climate forecasts. As a result, when the current satellite doing that job stops working, there will be no replacement." It's these polar orbiting satellites that also warn of deadly tornadoes and other severe weather conditions.
In the short term, the cost of Irene means diverting monies from the government's Disaster Relief Fund, cash intended for tornado clean up in Joplin, Missouri, and other towns. Congress will need to vote for more, probably billions more. And hurricane season isn't even over yet. (As I write, New Orleans faces Tropical Storm Lee and Hurricane Katia lurks in the Atlantic.)
But even though his Seventh Congressional District was damaged by Irene, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, our national scold, says no, not unless spending cuts are made elsewhere to offset the cost, dollar for dollar. (That includes earthquake damage, too, by the way, despite the fact that the epicenter of the August 23rd quake was in his Virginia district.)
"Just like any family would operate when it's struck by disaster," Cantor told Fox News, "it finds the money to take care of a sick loved one or what have you, and then goes without trying to buy a car or put an addition onto the house." It's more like "selling the family station wagon for spare parts," the website Media Matters said, and a far cry from 2004 when Cantor came running to fellow Republicans George Bush and Tom Ridge for no-strings-attached federal disaster assistance after Tropical Storm Gaston hit home. Nor when Bush was president did Rep. Cantor ever scream for offsets when it came to tax breaks for the wealthy, waging war, or – surprise – raising the debt ceiling.
What he's doing now is ornery, mean and just plain wrong -- ideological purity overruling common sense. Even New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, fresh off his pre-Irene "Get the hell off the beach" performance and no stranger himself to pigheadedness, declared, "We don't have time to wait for folks in Congress to figure out how they want to offset this stuff with other budget cuts… I don't want to hear about the fact that offsetting budget cuts have to come first before New Jersey citizens are taken care of."
Approving emergency aid in a national crisis is not to be held over our heads like some vindictive ransom note. It's neither penny wise nor pound foolish; it's immoral and, yes, un-American. This is not the way we were raised, not the way we were taught to treat one another. We lend a hand and figure out the costs later.
Yet in a time of national crisis, whether in or out of hurricane season, Cantor continues to spout pettifoggery and right wing Republicans go along with him, mindlessly nodding in obeisant agreement like so many bobble head dolls, even as the economy burns, infrastructure crumbles, funds are slashed and untold millions suffer.
Heckuva job, Eric.
Michael Winship is senior writing fellow at Demos, former senior writer at "Bill Moyers Journal" on PBS and current president of the Writers Guild of America, East More: Michael Winship

GLAAD calls VMA winner Tyler, The Creator "violently" "anti-gay"

Tyler, The Creator said his gay fans don't mind his lyricsby Jessica Geen 


The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation has condemned MTV for giving a VMA award to a singer it says is “violently anti-gay”.
Tyler, The Creator, whose real name is Tyler Okonma, won the best new artist award at Monday night’s ceremony.
GLAAD has attacked him in the past for using slurs such as “faggot” in lyrics, as well as references to rape and domestic violence.
The gay rights group said in a statement that the star and his band Odd Future write “some of the most violently anti-gay and misogynistic music currently enjoying mainstream recognition”.
GLAAD, which said that Tyler’s use of anti-gay slurs was routine, rather than occasional, also hit out at music critics and media who defend the singer.
Herndon Graddick, senior director of programmes at GLAAD, said: “Rather than providing simply a 
larger platform, MTV and other networks should educate viewers about why anti-gay and misogynistic language has no place in the music industry today.
“Given Tyler’s history of such remarks, viewers and potential sponsors should refrain from honoring homophobia and in the future look to a more deserving artist.”
Speaking to NME in June, Tyler said: “Well I have gay fans and they don’t really take it offensive, so I don’t know. If it offends you, it offends you.”
He added: “If you call me a nigga, I really don’t care, but that’s just me, personally. Some people might take it the other way, I personally don’t give a shit.”

Perry's BLuNt Views in Books Would Have To Match His BLuNt Lips/vice versa


Perry’s Blunt Views in Books Get New Scrutiny as He Joins Race


Lee Celano/Reuters
Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, at a signing in June, uses his books to denounce the income tax and shrug off climate change.



 


WASHINGTON — Rick Perry, the governor of Texas, believes thatclimate change is a “contrived, phony mess.” The federal income tax was the “great milestone on the road to serfdom.” And the Boy Scouts of America are under attack by “a radical homosexual movement.”
Ed Andrieski/Associated Press
Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, at a signing for “Fed Up!” in July.
Mr. Perry also thinks that senators should be chosen by legislatures, not the people. And he says that Social Security, the retirement program for the nation’s elderly, is a “failure” enacted during a power grab called the New Deal and is “something we have been forced to accept.”
Those blunt assertions are in two books Mr. Perry wrote while building a deep base of support in Texas among evangelical voters and Tea Party supporters. But the books have drawn new scrutiny now that Mr. Perry, a Republican, is running for president.
On Wednesday, Mr. Perry is likely to be asked about some of the statements he makes in the books when he takes the stage in his first nationally televised presidential debate. How he responds, and whether he defends the ideas or distances himself from them, will be an early test of his campaign.
On the campaign trail, Mr. Perry talks in broad, vague terms about the need to get America working again. But his words are much more specific in the books.
So far, Mr. Perry has stood by his statements in his books while allowing aides to distance his campaign from the writings. His spokesman has called “Fed Up! Our Fight to Save America from Washington” a “look back, not a path forward,” but when a reporter in Iowa asked Mr. Perry himself whether he stood by his statements, he claimed not to have “backed off anything in my book.”
Mark Miner, a spokesman for the governor, said Mr. Perry wrote the book to “foster discussion and to encourage his fellow Americans to think about how we choose to govern ourselves.” Mr. Miner said that the governor “trusts the American people to govern themselves” and said that principle would guide his thinking during the campaign.
But Mr. Perry’s own words at the beginning of “Fed Up!” suggest that he did not intend for it to sit on a shelf. “It is not enough to be fed up. We must act,” he wrote in the first chapter.
Touching a potential political minefield, Mr. Perry unleashes a critique against Social Security as “a crumbling monument to the failure of the New Deal.”
Mr. Perry’s assault on the retirement program is not a throwaway line or two. He asserts that the social programs of the New Deal — including Social Security — “never died, and like a bad disease, they have spread.” He says the Social Security trust fund is an “elaborate illusion cooked up by government magicians.”
Asked about the book recently, Mr. Perry went even further, calling Social Security a “Ponzi scheme for these young people” and a “monstrous lie on this generation.”
But his words skim over the financial reality of Social Security. Economists of all stripes agree that the program, while stressed, would exhaust the money in the trust fund by 2037. But even then, taxes would pay for close to 80 percent of the benefits currently promised.
In “Fed Up!,” Mr. Perry contrasts himself with politicians who represent places like Massachusetts — who he said support same-sex marriage and state-run health care. The passage, written less than a year ago, seems squarely aimed at his current rival, Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts.
When it comes to health care, Mr. Perry writes that President Obama’s legislation on the subject was “the closest this country has ever come to outright socialism,” largely ignoring the fact that Mr. Obama’s plan relies heavily on existing private insurance companies, doctors and drug manufacturers.
He takes particular aim at the 16th Amendment, which gives the federal government the power to levy an income tax, and the 17th Amendment, which allows for popular elections of senators rather than selection by state lawmakers.
Americans, Mr. Perry said, “mistakenly empowered the federal government during a fit of populist rage in the early 20th century.”
His campaign has said Mr. Perry does not believe that either amendment should be repealed, though in the book he raises the possibility of a national sales tax to replace the income tax. A national sales tax could face stiff resistance because it could shift the tax burden to the poor and middle class.
Mr. Miner said the book merely “reflects the governor’s view of how our nation got into the mess we find ourselves in today.”
In his other book, “On My Honor: Why the American Values of the Boy Scouts are Worth Fighting For,” Mr. Perry, a former Eagle Scout, offers a defense against criticism of the Scouts for not allowing homosexuals to participate.
He lambastes the American Civil Liberties Union and people who “claimed to be agnostics” for their battle over many years to change the membership policies for the Scouts.
In one much-quoted passage, Mr. Perry compares gays and lesbians to alcoholics who choose to drink.
“Even if someone is attracted to a person of the same sex, he or she still makes a choice to engage in sexual activity with someone of the same gender,” Mr. Perry writes.
His writings about homosexuality are a departure from many of his contemporaries in the Republican Party.
In Washington last year, Congress voted to end the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policyrestricting gay and lesbian service members amid survey evidence of a new acceptance in the military and in the broader community.
In the book Mr. Perry also takes on the A.C.L.U. as leading a campaign against religion in public life, accusing “a small minority of atheists” of trying to sanitize our civil dialogue.
“They protesteth too much,” he writes. “It’s as if the mere mention of a Creator is too powerful an idea for their own Godless ideology to withstand.”

Documents show ties between Libyan spy head, CIA





TRIPOLI, Libya (AP) -- The CIA and other Western intelligence agencies worked closely with the ousted regime of Moammar Gadhafi, sharing tips and cooperating in handing over terror suspects for interrogation to a regime known to use torture, according to a trove of security documents discovered after the fall of Tripoli.
The revelations provide new details on the West's efforts to turn Libya's mercurial leader from foe to ally and provide an embarrassing example of the U.S. administration's collaboration with authoritarian regimes in the war on terror.
The documents, among tens of thousands found in an External Security building in Tripoli, show an increasingly warm relationship, with CIA agents proposing to set up a permanent Tripoli office, addressing their Libyan counterparts by their first names and giving them advice. In one memo, a British agent even sends Christmas greetings.
AP PhotoThe agencies were known to cooperate as the longtime Libyan ruler worked to overcome his pariah status by stopping his quest for weapons of mass destruction and renouncing support for terrorism. But the new details show a more extensive relationship than was previously known, with Western agencies offering lists of questions for specific detainees and apparently the text for a Gadhafi speech.
They also offer a glimpse into the inner workings of the now-defunct CIA program of extraordinary rendition, through which terror suspects were secretly detained, sent to third countries and sometimes underwent the so-called enhanced interrogation tactics like waterboarding.
The documents mention a half dozen names of people targeted for rendition, including Tripoli's new rebel military commander, Abdel-Hakim Belhaj.
Peter Bouckaert of Human Rights Watch, which helped find the documents, called the ties between Washington and Gadhafi's regime "A very dark chapter in American intelligence history."
"It remains a stain on the record of the American intelligence services that they cooperated with these very abusive intelligence services," he said Saturday.
The findings could cloud relations between the West and Libya's new leaders, although Belhaj said he holds no grudge. NATO airstrikes have helped the rebels advance throughout the six-month civil war and continue to target regime forces as rebels hunt for Gadhafi.
Belhaj is the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, a now-dissolved militant organization that sought to assassinate Gadhafi.
Belhaj says CIA agents tortured him in a secret prison in Thailand before he was returned to Libya and locked in the notorious Abu Salim prison. He insists he was never a terrorist and believes his arrest was in reaction to what he called the "tragic events of 9/11."
Two documents from March 2004 show American and Libyan officials arranging Belhaj's rendition.
Referring to him by his nom de guerre, Abdullah al-Sadiq, the documents said he and his pregnant wife were due to travel to Thailand, where they would be detained.
"We are planning to arrange to take control of the pair in Bangkok and place them on our aircraft for a flight to your country," they tell the Libyans. The memo also requested that Libya, a country known for decades for torture and ill-treatment of prisoners: "Please be advised that we must be assured that al-Sadiq will be treated humanely and that his human rights will be respected."
The documents coincide with efforts by the Gadhafi regime over the last decade to emerge from international isolation, even agreeing to pay compensation to relatives of each of the 270 victims of the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am jumbo jet over Lockerbie, Scotland.
The documents show the CIA and MI6 advising the regime on how to work to rescind its designation as a state sponsor of terror - a move the Bush administration made in 2006. Both agencies received intelligence benefits in return.
The validity of the documents, not written on official letterhead, could not be independently verified, but their content seems consistent with what has been previously reported about intelligence activities during the period.
Later correspondence deals with technical visits to Libya to track the regime's progress in dismantling its weapons programs.
In one undated memo, the CIA proposes establishing a permanent presence in Libya.
"I propose that our services take an additional step in cooperation with the establishment of a permanent CIA presence in Libya," it says. It is signed by hand "Steve."
Another memo is a follow-up query to an apparent Libyan warning of terror plots against American interests abroad.
One document is a draft statement for Gadhafi about his country's decision to give up weapons of mass destruction.
"Our belief is that an arms race does not serve the security of Libya or the security of the region and contradicts Libya's great keenness for world peace and security," it suggests as wording.
But much of the correspondence deals with arrangements to render terror suspects to Libya from South Africa, Hong Kong and elsewhere. One CIA memo from April 2004 tells Libyan authorities that the agency can deliver a suspect known as "Shaykh Musa."
"We respectfully request an expression of interest from your service regarding taking custody of Musa," the memo says.
CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood declined to comment Saturday on specific allegations related to the documents.
"It can't come as a surprise that the Central Intelligence Agency works with foreign governments to help protect our country from terrorism and other deadly threats," Youngblood said. "That is exactly what we are expected to do."
British Foreign Secretary William Hague also declined to comment on intelligence matters.
In Tripoli, Anes Sherif, an aide to Belhaj, said the documents provided little new information: "We have known for a long time that (the British and U.S. governments) had very close relations with Gadhafi's regime."
Amid the shared intelligence and names of terror suspects are traces of personal relationships.
In one letter from Dec. 24, 2003, a British official thanks Gadhafi's spy chief Moussa Koussa - who later became foreign minister and defected early in the uprising - for a "very large quantity of dates and oranges" and encourages him to continue with reforms.
"Your achievement realizing the Leader's initiative has been enormous and of huge importance," the British official says. "At this time sacred to peace, I offer you my admiration and every congratulation.
© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about ourPrivacy Policy and Terms of Use.
 

EX Mayor Ed Koch 'F* those guys': NYC Gays:"He Likes to do Just that"


Koch On His Critics: Fuck Those Guys~~~~~As the NYC gay community knows and understands it, Kock loves toF* the guys. This guy was never one that could be trusted. His words were like the promised he made never to run for governor, which he forgot and the voters held his feet to the fire on that one. Now I guess old, alone and looking for attention he goes to bat for an enemy of the gay community in NYC who is running for the seat to congress vacated by Weiner. Well we in the gay community say to this guy, same to you buster..and what goes around....comes around. adamfoxie*

The following is from  joemygod.blogspot
As I noted here earlier this week, former NYC mayor Ed Koch has
 endorsed the NOM-backed anti-gay GOP candidate in the special
 election to replace Rep. Anthony Weiner. And Koch is
not too happy to be called out as the closet case that he
 is for making this endorsement.
[Daniel] Dromm, who is one of a handful of LGBT members of the City Council, says Koch should be supporting Democrat David Weprin, because Weprin supports same-sex marriage, and Koch, Dromm says, is gay. “Koch’s whole thing is bizarre,” Dromm said, taking special exception to the former mayor’s support for an opponent of gay marriage since he is “a closet case.” He is joined in his criticism by fiery LGBT activist Allen Roskoff, who tells the paper, “It’s a disgrace that Ed Koch is supporting someone who would deny his right to marry.” Koch has a salty response: "Oh, fuck those two guys."

SEARCH This BLOG

Loading...

Amazon SearchBox/ Most Things You buy through here will give us a few cents

Popular Posts

The Forest Needs help

ONE

ONE
Relief World Hunger

Save The Lungs of The Earth

Orangutans ARE Part of the Forest

Love is Sharing

Pride Shack

Gay Male Pride Items #1 (Vertical Banner)

Click Here To Get Anything by Amazon- That will keep US Going

Young Love Collection

CDC

SiGn ThE PeTiTiOn

DVD's

HIV Army

Blog Archive