May 27, 2011

Amnesty International Helping In GLBT Rights-50 yrs Latter



Amnesty International logo.svg
Amnesty International
Over fifty years ago, on 19 November 1960, a youngBritish barrister travelling on the London underground read an article about two Portuguese students who were jailed after raising their glasses to toast liberty. The students were sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment.
The barrister, Peter Benenson, was so outraged at this that he wrote to The Observer in an appeal to unite people against injustice of this kind. His article, ‘Forgotten Prisoners’, which was published on 27 May 1961, stated: ‘Open your newspaper any day of the week and you will find a story from somewhere of someone being imprisoned, tortured or executed because his opinions or religion are unacceptable to his government … The newspaper reader feels a sickening sense of impotence. Yet if these feelings of disgust could be united into common action, something effective could be done.’ Benenson called for an international movement in which individuals could communicate by letter, in order to prevent events like this happening again.
Although it would be almost a year before the organisation was given its official name, Amnesty International was born. The organisation is now a household name and has an extremely favourable public image. To maintain such a positive public image and span the globe so comprehensively, in a time before internet communications, is a respectable achievement in itself. However, Amnesty International’s most significant and noteworthy work is undoubtedly its enormous contribution to the fight for human rights.
Amnesty International has approximately 3 million members worldwide and is the longest-running of all the organisations that campaign for human rights. Although its initial focus was to support and aid people who had been wrongly imprisoned, the charity now fights against any abuse of human rights.
Amnesty’s 50th anniversary marks a great achievement. The charity’s growth over the last half-century has been quite incredible, and the passion that surrounded the cause at the time of its conception showed that Benenson was not alone in his desire to address breaches of human rights. Although Benenson was the first to act, the organisation’s success shows that human rights issues were clearly at the fore of many people’s minds.
Amnesty International’s influence provides a lifeline for people who have been deprived of their liberty and dignity. As an organisation that fights against injustices of human rights, it is unsurprising that gay rights are also firmly on the charity’s agenda. Amnesty International’s LGBT network addresses injustice for people who are marginalised, or worse, due to their sexual orientation. It puts pressure on governments and leads campaigns in order to empower individuals and groups.
Clare Bracey, LGBT Campaign Manager for Amnesty International tells So So Gay that ‘over 60 countries around the world criminalise homosexuality, and in eight of these countries the maximum penalty is death. The criminalisation of people based on their sexual orientation contravenes international and regional human rights treaties.’ Some of Amnesty International’s recent achievements include helping legalise same-sex marriage in Argentina, campaigning for Lithuania to have its first Baltic Pride, and helping Turkey keep open Black Pink, an LGBT organisation that had been threatened with closure.
Amnesty International’s work in such cases is undoubtedly admirable. However, a criticism that might be ventured is that there appears to be an imbalance in the charity’s national and international work. The majority of Amnesty’s LGBT work in the UK involves a presence at various Pride marches. Although necessary, some might claim that this kind of support is neither unique nor innovative; pride marches are an absolute necessity for the gay community, but it is perhaps in the political realm where there is more work to be done. ‘Pride events in the UK are a fantastic opportunity to celebrate the successes made in the fight for equality and to remind us that there is still so much to do,’ says Bracey. They unite, inspire and empower people, allowing them to claim ownership of their spaces and give them the courage to feel proud of who they are.
But are they enough? Very clearly, there is still a lot of work to be done. In comparison to injustices in many countries, the UK is undoubtedly a fair few steps ahead, but just two very recent events in London indicate that the LGBT community is still less than fully equal in society.

The John Snow incident indicates that the UK has a way to go on LGBT rights.
On 13 April 2011, a gay couple were asked to leave the John Snow pub in Soho because they kissed. The second incident, only days later, involved a twenty-year-old man being physically attacked in Clapham, opposite the gay bar Kazbar. The events sparked public outrage and made many people think about how gay people are still treated by some in society. Incidents like this highlight the need to remember the attitudes that still need to change at home, as well as internationally.
One example of where the charity can play a big part internationally is that of Malawi couple Steven Monjeza and Tiwonge Chimbalanga, who were sentenced to 14 years in prison in June 2010 for participating in a same-sex engagement ceremony. Following international condemnation of the sentence, the couple were eventually given a presidential pardon. Still, concerns remained – and remain – about further harassment they could face unless the law is changed. Amnesty International put pressure on Malawi’s government to prevent abuse towards the couple. Here in the UK, it can be all too easy to forget how far things have come. Laws have been changed to protect gay people, but with this privilege comes a necessary understanding that this was not always the case. Amnesty would argue that as a country that has made achievements in this area, we need to be leaders in enforcing change elsewhere.
Another recent example of Amnesty’s role is in the case of Bradley Manning, the US soldier accused of leaking confidential documents to Wikileaks. He was subjected to detention conditions which contradicted his pre-trial status. Amnesty International sent letters to US President Barack Obama and Secretary of Defence Robert Gates, aiming to put a stop to this treatment. In April this year, Amnesty International Americas Director Susan Lee said: ‘Bradley Manning is being held in unnecessarily harsh conditions that are inconsistent with his status as an untried prisoner. We urge the US authorities to review Bradley Manning’s situation. Under international standards, prisoners who have not yet stood trial should be treated in accordance with their right to the presumption of innocence.’ Last month it was announced that Manning would be moved to a new detention centre where it was hoped his conditions would significantly improve. Lee announced, ‘We believe sustained public pressure for the US government to uphold human rights in Bradley Manning’s case has contributed to this move.’ Amnesty, too, surely played a part.
The 50th anniversary of any charity is a great cause for celebration. As well as their LGBT campaigning, the work that Amnesty International has done is influential, far-reaching and appreciated by millions. It tirelessly campaigns to fight injustice, and is realistic in knowing how much work still needs to be done, including within the LGBT arena. As Bracey points out, ‘LGBT rights are not special rights – they are human rights. As we move forward into our next 50 years we need to challenge this unacceptable situation.’

Lesbian says police 'took her to evangelical gay conversion instead of drug rehab'



Claim: Lesbian Amanda Booker alleges police officers paid two evangelicals $600 to turn her straight
Claim: Lesbian Amanda Booker alleges police officers paid two evangelicals $600 to turn her straight
A lesbian woman is taking a sheriff's department to court after it allegedly paid two self-styled evangelicals $600 to turn her straight.
Amanda Booker claims officers at Bartow County Sheriff's Department in Georgia took her to a pair of gay conversion therapists instead of a drug rehabilitation centre.
Ms Booker, who is now in custody after a separate incident, is suing county officials - including the Sheriff and County Commissioner - for violating her constitutional rights.
She names several officers in the lawsuit, and claims she was left traumatised because their normal policy was to 'punish homosexuals'.
But Sheriff Clark Milsap denies all allegations concerning the incident, and laughed when confronted by local newspaper the GA Voice.
He said: 'I haven’t been served (with papers). But, no ma’am, that is the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard in my life.'
County Commissioner Clarence Brown also declined to comment on the suit because he had not yet seen it.
According to the lawsuit, the incident happened in April 2010, after Ms Booker's family called police and asked them to commit her to a psychiatric hospital because of her drug addiction.
She claims the deputies who collected her deliberately ignored an order issued by a judge to take her to Northwest Georgia Regional Hospital.
She suffered a seizure in the car, and was taken by ambulance to Cartersville Medical Center where she was met by a number of officers including Lieutenant Mark Mayton.
Accused: Ms Booker names several Bartow County officials in the lawsuit, including Sheriff Clark Milsap, pictured, and Commissioner Clarence Brown
Accused: Ms Booker names several Bartow County officials in the lawsuit, including Sheriff Clark Milsap, pictured, and Commissioner Clarence Brown
Ms Booker claims Lt Mayton began to harass her, threatened her and even told her she had to end her relationship with her lesbian partner. 
She alleges the lieutenant later transferred to her to the care of two self-described evangelists, Chris and Donna McDowell.
The suit claims Lt Mayton paid the couple $600 from county funds to look after Ms Booker in their own home and convert her from homosexuality.
Ms Booker said she managed to escape from the couple and went to her mother's house, but said Lt Mayton caught up with her there. 
Threats: Ms Booker claims Lieutenant Mark Mayton told her she had to break up with her lesbian partner when she arrived at Cartersville Medical Center
Threats: Ms Booker claims Lieutenant Mark Mayton told her she had to break up with her lesbian partner when she arrived at Cartersville Medical Center
She claims he tried to arrest her without a warrant, pushed her up against a patrol car and 'lifted up Ms Booker's shirt to expose her bare breasts.'
Ms Booker's lawyer, Anthony Perrotta, said he first heard about the case from her girlfriend.
He told the GA Voice: 'She’s not doing well. She’s not getting the care she needs for her drug addiction. She’s hurting. My first priority is to get her out of prison.'
The lawsuit claims it was normal for officers named  to 'harass homosexuals taken into custody, to mandate that homosexuals taken into custody refrain from living as homosexuals, and to forbid them from maintaining any homosexual relationships.'
Ms Booker was arrested and charged later that year for allegedly damaging a police car. She has been in custody ever since.


 http://www.dailymail.co.uk

‘Gay Cure’ Therapist Guilty of Malpractice


Lesley Pilkington was found guilty of malpracticeLesley Pilkington was found guilty of malpractice

A Christian therapist who tried to turn a gay undercover journalist straight has been found guilty of professional malpractice.
This week, a professional trial at the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP) unanimously ruled that Lesley Pilkington had acted unprofessionally.
Mrs Pilkington, 60, was secretly recorded last year by gay journalist Patrick Strudwick, who had approached her claiming to be a Christian who wanted to become straight.
She told him that his homosexuality was a “mental illness” and she could help him overcome it.
Such therapy is recognised almost universally as useless at best and harmful at worst.
Mr Strudwick, who won several awards for his expose, was also told by Ms Pilkington that he must have been sexually abused as a child by a member of his family.
After visiting her for counselling in Chorleywood, Hertfordshire, he reported her to the BACP.
According to an article written by Mr Strudwick for the Guardian today, the BACP panel described Mrs Pilkington as “reckless”, “disrespectful”, “dogmatic” and “unprofessional”.
Mrs Pilkington’s BACP accreditation has been suspended and she must complete “extensive training and professional development”. If she does not comply, she may be struck off, the report says.
The BACP refused to provide PinkNews.co.uk with a copy of the ruling. A spokesman said Mrs Pilkington has 28 days to appeal and would not comment further.
Mrs Pilkington, who is supported by the Christian Legal Centre, accused Mr Strudwick of “irresponsible reporting” and of breaching the hearing’s confidentiality.
She said she would make “seek to make a joint complaint with the BACP to the Press Complaints Commission in relation to the subterfuge and deceit used by [him].”
She added: “Reparative therapy is a valid therapy that many people want and it should not be damaged by irresponsible reporting. The hearing is still subject to an appeal.”
Andrea Minichiello Williams, of the Christian Legal Centre, said Mrs Pilkington was being “persecuted” by gay rights campaigners.
She added: “We are grateful that the decision of the Professional Conduct Committee has not questioned the validity of reparative therapy and individuals are still free to seek counselling services for reorientation when they choose to change their behaviour.”
In January, the Christian Legal Centre claimed Mr Strudwick was “intimidating” Mrs Pilkington’s trial witnesses. The journalist responded that the other camp was conducting a “smear campaign”and did not actually have any witnesses.
Mr Strudwick’s undercover investigation, which also involved a psychiatrist who promised to cure gays, was published in the Independent last year and sparked anger in the gay community over the treatments.
Speaking to PinkNews.co.uk, Mr Strudwick said he was “delighted” with the outcome of the hearing.
He said: “This sends out a very strong message to psychotherapists in the UK and around the world that there practices are not accepted by mainstream medical opinion and are not supported by professional associations.
“I am somewhat disappointed that the BACP did not see fit to immediately strike Pilkington off but that is a matter for them.
“As for the Christian Legal Centre accusing me of breaching confidentiality, I would remind them that it was them who went to the press in the first place. I never named Pilkington.”
He added that the CLC had published a “large chunk” of the ruling on its own website.

Follow Up: Jim Daly's anti gay 'Focus On The Family's White Flag?'



We were the first to isolate and shoot out the comments to World magazine wherein Focus on the Family president Jim Daly got a little more honest than we're used to hearing from the "protect marriage" crowd, admitting that the young people polling shows his side has "probably lost" in their fight to limit marriage in our culture:
Screen Shot 2011-05-27 At 4.59.18 Pm"We're losing on that one, especially among the 20- and 30-somethings: 65 to 70 percent of them favor same-sex marriage. I don't know if that's going to change with a little more age—demographers would say probably not. We've probably lost that. I don't want to be extremist here, but I think we need to start calculating where we are in the culture."

-Jim Daly, speaking to World Magazine
Next, we got a followup comment from Focus on the Family Comm. guy Gary Schneeberger, where Gary built on/extended Daly's earlier thoughts with the claim that Daly has been saying this same thing for years. And we pontificated on that.
So now, to close out this saga for good, we will briefly address what we assume are Daly's final comments on the matter. They come from his semi-regular Washington Post column:
So, let me be clear: I am not waving a white flag. I’m not even contemplating picking one up. There is still much work to be done by those of us in the faith community to advocate forScreen Shot 2011-05-27 At 5.04.45 Pmmarriage as it has been defined, and practiced, by every civilized society for millennia.

My comments to World are no more or no less than a continuation of something I’ve been saying for years: That we cannot expect the culture to be the church. As Christians, we are called to speak the truth in love, and advance it in public policy, regardless of opinion polls or shifting political winds. But our responsibility doesn’t end at the bully pulpit or the ballot box. We also must model the beauty and permanence of traditional marriage to society. And, to be frank, we have not done a very good job in that regard. 
...
Maybe it’s because of those [31 marriage] election results that liberals and progressives – engaging in a little wishful thinking -- have been so quick to assume my interview comments represent an ideological or strategic shift, when, in fact, what I am saying is, let’s look past whatever writing may be on the cultural wall and joyfully embody kingdom principles to the world. What’s the focus of Focus on the Family? [WaPo]
But here's what we mean when we say Daly doesn't get it. He makes it all about what he, personally, is and is not doing. He's not waving a white flag. He is still planning to use faith to fight against civil marriage. He is just continuing his longheld thoughts. He's not going to stop speaking what he considers to be Christian truth. And so on and so forth.
But the thing is: None of that matters in terms of the civil rights fight! Because what Daly's comments showed, without a shadow of a doubt, is a recognition of inevitable loss on this issue. That's not even a slight stretch: It is exactly what he was saying, that the culture is headed in one decided direction. And it's also exactly what we who fight for marriage equality care about: The culture that is headed towards supporting CIVIL marriage equality.
We, of course, don't "expect the culture to be the church" -- in fact we DEMAND that the culture start recognizing the difference between religious ceremony and civil marriage licensing/sanctioning. Doing so would've ended this conversation years ago!!!
We don't care if Focus staff and supporters opt to "model the beauty and permanence of traditional marriage to society," as they see it. Just as we will model the beauty and permanence of the wonderful LGBT people who enrich our society.
We certainly don't mind if Focusers "look past whatever writing may be on the cultural wall" in hopes that billowy, heterosexist rhetoric will up and change a pro-LGBT generation's mind. Because we will continue to challenge that soft tone by showing the world the crude, anti-scientific propaganda that this organization churns out in order to "change" gays, and see which tone the year 2025 finds more palatable.
We don't mind because we do know that the culture is changing towards the more principled. And we know that groups like Focus are a big reason why. We just didn't realize that Focus on the Family was ready to be more honest about that.
So again: This site was the first to put this out there, and therefore this writer can tell you better than anyone else that my reaction wasn't a bout of "wishful thinking." Never in a million years did I think any Focus on the Family staffers, those indefatigable trailblazers in the civil discrimination fight, were on the cusp of stopping their personally-held faith beliefs. Nor would I expect them to stop trying to foist these beliefs on others. Didn't think or expect those things, because neither were anywhere near my realm of consideration! What I care about is the efficacy of their faith-based efforts to stifle civil rights. Efforts that Daly himself admits are "probably lost" with America's cultural future (a.k.a. the base of support that will grant civil equality to LGBT Americans).
And FoTF donors will ultimately decide what this means for the organization's "protect marriage" wing, not me or Jim or anyone else.

Bradlee Dean uses "suicide prevention" to raise money for anti-gay ministry


BradleeDeanLegislatureShort.JPG
Bradlee Dean, the man behind the ministry.


  
Miller walked over to a table where the man's partner was sitting with a jar for donations. They wanted $20. Miller gave him $5, and in return was given a pair of fliers.
She didn't really think about it again until last week, when Bradlee Dean, the head of the You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International ministry, made headlines with a universally condemned prayer before the state legislature.

"They told me they were collecting money to help people on drugs," he says.
That sounded like a good cause to Marous, so he allowed the Ministry to set up a fund-raising table at his station. They've been there two or three times a month ever since, he says.
Yet the group's most current 990 tax filings confess to an altogether different mission:
"To reshape America by redirecting our youth morally and spiritually through education. (Hosea 4:6) The ministry's street teams spoke to over 250,000 people last year concerning their spiritual destiny and our nation's religious history." 
The function of the street teams, the filing reports, is to share the gospel and distribute CDs and literature.
ycrychwalmart.JPG
Sally Jo Sorensen
One of Dean's street teams in action at Walmart this week.
​The street teams represent the overwhelming majority of the Ministry's expenses ($280,039) and revenue ($444,126). But back in 2009, You Can Run also used to present school assemblies:
"The presentation covers current issues which may include drugs, alcoholism, suicide, sex, media, our country, our Veterans, the Constitution."
Those topics don't seem to actually have been the focus of the school assemblies, though. In fact, the ministry has developed a well-documented reputation for showing up at schools promising to talk about drugs, then laying a heavy dose of anti-abortion propaganda on unsuspecting students.
When City Pages spoke with Dean by telephone yesterday, he said there's nothing deceptive about presenting his ministry to potential donors as a suicide prevention or drug-abuse prevention organization.
"We do address the topic," Dean said. "We do tell the kids that, you know what? Suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. So it is a part of our ministry."
His claims aren't persuasive to Julia Miller, who regrets giving $5 to You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International -- not least because her friend who committed suicide was gay.
"When I realized that was the group I had given money to, I felt sick to my stomach," Miller says. "Other people need to be made aware of this, so they don't make the same mistake I did."
Here are the 2009 tax filings for Dean's ministry:
YouCanRun2009TaxesPage1.jpg

YouCanRun2009TaxesPage2.jpg
http://blogs.citypages.com


SEARCH This BLOG

Loading...

Amazon SearchBox/ Most Things You buy through here will give us a few cents

Popular Posts

The Forest Needs help

ONE

ONE
Relief World Hunger

Save The Lungs of The Earth

Orangutans ARE Part of the Forest

Love is Sharing

Pride Shack

Gay Male Pride Items #1 (Vertical Banner)

Click Here To Get Anything by Amazon- That will keep US Going

Young Love Collection

CDC

SiGn ThE PeTiTiOn

DVD's

HIV Army

Blog Archive