February 22, 2011

HIV positive kids get to play cricket with South Africa's World Cup team



NEW DELHI — A group of 10 HIV positive children played cricket with South Africa's World Cup team during a practice session on Tuesday.

The event at New Delhi's Ferozeshah Kotla ground was part of an initiative by the International Cricket Council with UNICEF and UNAIDS called 'Think Wise'.

"The idea is to create awareness about HIV and to get rid of the stigma attached to it," ICC representative Jon Long said.
The youngsters batted, bowled and fielded on the field where South Africa will play West Indies in both teams' first World Cup match in Group B on Thursday.

The ICC has organized such sessions at previous international events, with a similar one being held during the World Twenty20 championship in the West Indies last year.


The Associated Press...

http://www.actup.org

Take a stand against hatred in Uganda


FEBRUARY 22, 2011 – KANSAS CITY – On Sunday, February 20th, the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, in partnership with Soulforce, a civil rights organization seeking freedom from religious and political oppression of LGBTQQ people, held a vigil outside fundamentalist pastor Lou Engle’s International House of Prayer.
The vigil was held in protest of Engle’s anti-LGBT rhetoric, which has played a key role in escalating the climate of anti-gay hatred in Uganda that most recently led to the murder of leading gay activist David Kato.  More than 70,000 people have signed a petition asking Engle to immediately halt such rhetoric, and to travel to Uganda to denounce the criminalization of homosexuality.   Immediately after the vigil, a group including Rev. Dr. Cindi Love, Executive Director of Soulforce, and Moses Kushaba, a gay Ugandan forced to flee the country and seek asylum in the United States, delivered this petition to leading members of Engle’s staff.  Engle has agreed to meet with Rev. Love, Kushaba, and other allies at a date to be determined.
Members of the group have issued statements in response to the day’s events. "I know first-hand how dangerous life is for LGBT people in Uganda. If anyone is guilty of supporting or fostering the climate of hate and violence, Lou Engle is," said Moses Kushaba, a gay Ugandan who left the country and was granted political asylum by the United States government.  Continued Kushaba: "Engle’s The Call and the other American evangelical groups have been exporting homophobia, misinformation and lies about LGBT people for far too long. Their propaganda campaign is part of the reason LGBT Ugandans not only continue to be public targets for violence including mob justice, but could be subjected to the criminalization of their very existence and the sanctioning of unimaginable human rights violations that include the death penalty, or the anti-homosexuality bill that renders every Ugandan a potential criminal."
Concluded Kushaba: “The LGBT population in Uganda is facing a wide range of challenges: fear of being outed, losing their families, forcing themselves to marry for self-protection, being thrown out of their homes, losing their jobs, expulsion from school, unwarranted house searches, and raids by police. The situation has created a sense of fear and hopelessness for the Ugandan LGBT community. Some are abusing drugs now, thus contracting HIV/AIDS. Now people are leaving the country in fear of being the next target. Mob justice is real in Uganda, and Pastor Lou Engle is one of the people who has played the largest roles in creating that climate. I hope and pray we can convince him to stop perpetuating the harm he has caused and the lives being ruined because of it.”
Dr. Sharon Groves, Director of HRC’s Religion and Faith Program, said: “We have seen far too much brutality and harm perpetuated against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in the name of religion.  Now is the time for religious leaders in the US to say no more.  No more will we allow the deep love at the core of our faith traditions to be retooled into an instrument of terror and hatred.  No more will we allow our most sacred texts to be distorted into justifications for imprisonment, torture and even murder.  We call on all people of faith to claim loudly that it is morally unworthy of us as people to criminalize anyone  for who they are.  We demand that those who have built empires perpetuating a message of hate and terror recognize the damage they have caused and stop using religion to justify bigotry.  We must do better.  Our faith demands it of us.”
Said Rev. Dr. Cindi Love, Executive Director of Soulforce: “As Moses Kushaba can personally attest, LGBT Ugandans must live their lives in fear, thanks in large part to the work of American evangelicals like Lou Engle.   It is time for Engle to confront this bigotry at the source, rather than encouraging it.   It is time that anti-gay evangelicals like Engle realize that just as we have fought back against bigotry here, we will not allow it to triumph in Uganda.  For if people of faith are exporting anything to other nations, it ought to be hope, not hate.”
The Human Rights Campaign (www.hrc.org) is America’s largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality. By inspiring and engaging all Americans, HRC strives to end discrimination against LGBT citizens and realize a nation that achieves fundamental fairness and equality for all.
Soulforce (www.Soulforce.org) – guided by the spirit of truth and empowered by the principles of relentless nonviolent resistance – works to end the religious and political oppression of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning people.

 http://miamiherald.typepad.com/gaysouthflorida/2011/02/gay-ugandans-american-allies-to-fundamentalist-pastor-lou-engle-take-a-stand-against-hatred-in-uganda.html#ixzz1Ek18Rn86

Libyan Martyrs The Blood Spilled


by L. S. Carbonell
It was too much to hope that all the autocratic regimes in the Middle East would give in with little or no bloodshed to the tidal wave of democracy rolling across the region. Col. Moammar Qaddafi of Libya has chosen to be the one to put his own power above the lives of the citizens of his nation. The streets of Tripoli are running with blood.
Qaddafi gave a screaming, fist-pounding speech from the lobby of the bombed-out palace that he left unrepaired as a monument to the U. S. bombing attack during the Reagan administration. He had a statue erected in the rubble – a golden fist crushing a U. S. fighter jet. It created a surreal background for a speech in which he announced “Libya wants glory, Libya wants to be at the pinnacle, at the pinnacle of the world. I am a fighter, a revolutionary from tents … I will die as a martyr at the end, to my last drop of blood.” He called the revolutionaries drug-addled, misguided youths, bought off by a “small, sick group,” fomented by “bearded men” (Islamic fundamentalists) and Libyans exiles. He rallied his supporters to attack the revolutionaries, “You men and women who love Qaddafi … get out of your homes and fill the streets. Leave your homes and attack them in their lairs. The police cordons will be lifted, go out and fight them, for the defense of the revolution and the defense of Qaddafi. Forward, forward, forward!” And they went forward. Witnesses have handed off thumb drives to an Al Jazeera reporter who managed to get into Libya. The images show gangs of Qaddafi supporters roaming the streets, shooting anyone they saw, firing machine guns into the fronts of homes.
Qaddafi is not going to survive this revolution. I will not be the least bit surprised to wake up one morning before the end of this week and hear that someone close to him has put his nation out of its misery, after all, he said he would be a martyr. Qaddafi has literally vowed to burn Tripoli to the ground before he gives up power. He has ordered fighter jets to strafe the city and planes to drop bombs indiscriminately. He called the revolutionaries (they passed being protesters days ago) “dogs” who deserved to die. He even claimed that the United States was dropping bombs on Tripoli. Whether he was pulling that one out of his butt or has seriously lost his grip on reality is unknown. Reports are claiming that many of those working for Qaddafi are sub-Saharans hired for this repression. These are men who learned their tactics in places like Rwanda. So far, and this is a big “so far” he has not ordered the oil fields set afire.
Qaddafi has almost no support left within Libya. Army units are handing out weapons to revolutionaries. At least two pilots flew their planes out of the country rather than fire on citizens. His cabinet ministers have quit. His entire U. N. delegation has quit. Libyan diplomats all over the country are quitting. The entire eastern side of the Libya is in the hands of the revolutionaries. NBC’s Richard Engel has reached Benghazi and is literally half of the journalists inside the country. The tribes west of Tripoli have thrown their support behind the revolution. The circle of revolution around Qaddafi is slowly tightening.
pre-Qaddafi Libyan flag being flown by revolutionaries
The death toll can only be guessed at. The number reported by those hospitals and doctors who have gotten messages out appears to be around 300. But that did not include the unclaimed, uncollected bodies lying in the streets of Tripoli.
The United Kingdom has sent a war ship to evacuate British and other foreign workers from Tripoli. Thousands have already fled, airlifted out by their own and other governments. The oil has stopped flowing from Libya, with a resultant spike in oil prices in an industry that doesn’t deal with disruption with any rational actions. Oil rose from $88 a barrel on Monday to $93 a barrel on Tuesday, even while Saudi Arabia has said that it can up production to cover the loss of Libya’s supply.
The U. N. Security Council was in emergency session Tuesday, with discussions about how to intervene to end the violence against the people of Tripoli. Libya’s own deputy ambassador asked the U. N. to imposed a no-fly zone to prevent foreign mercenaries from entering the country. No nation has offered him asylum if he should choose to leave.
President Bush thought he could “plant the seed of democracy” in the Middle East by conquering Afghanistan and Iraq. Democracy doesn’t work that way. Conquering armies that turn into occupying armies are enemies of democracy because they are seen by the conquered as imperialists who are rigging elections to put their supporters into power. Whether America has done this or not is irrelevant. It is how the occupations and the governments they created are perceived. The movement spreading over the Middle East is how democracy really happens – out of the people who want to be free, who want to participate in their own governance, who want to work their way through the hard work of building a free nation. They don’t want it done for them.
Moammar Qaddafi cannot survive. He must not survive. His survival would embolden other autocratic rulers to use hired mercenaries to kill their own citizens to preserve power. His survival would slow if not halt this great movement forward to democracy among people all around the world. His survival would turn a reasonably violence-free democracy quest into civil wars with tens of thousands of victims. Moammar Qaddafi cannot be allowed to survive. Hopefully, sooner than later, someone in his inner circle will fulfill his wish to die for his country. Hopefully, his family will flee rather than face the wrath of Libya’s people. Then, the Libyan people can begin the long hard fight to stabilize their country and build a true democracy.

What Is Marriage For? In Marriage We Trust?



Gay wedding
'Civil partnerships are not marriage. The last government made that clear when it said they could not be religiously solemnised.' Photograph: Daniel Berehulak/Getty Images

The question: What is marriage for?

What is marriage for? To bind together a man and a woman (yes, really – I'll come back to this) for life; in the interests of children and social stability; for their good, and that of society; for the nurturing and propagation of the human species. And because it works.
As the child of serial divorcees – I shall dine later this week with my stepfather's widow – I'm surprised to find myself writing the last of those reasons. Like many casualties of this generation, I saw marriage as a seaside gambling den: a noisy, fractious place where everyone eventually loses. I wasn't sure I wanted it; and when I realised I did, I reckoned myself existentially incapable. But last year, I took vows in my parish church before God and friends. Amazingly, my fiancée turned up and did the same. It was a village wedding in central London. The parishioners decorated the hall; the choir morphed into a band. Since then, life's been amazingly peaceful. There's a thin stream of joy through it all.
Here's what I've learned. Marriage works because it's designed gently to destroy the ego. The object of life is to give yourself over to others. But most of us resist, because experience tells us it's dangerous to trust. Over time, marriage erodes that resistance. The sheer constant, inescapable thereness of the other teaches us that it's all right, after all, to let down the guard.
But that needs two things. The first is that marriage must be inescapable. I don't mean that wives should stay around while their husbands beat them. I mean that it cannot be a "let's-see-how-this-works-out" temporary contract based on subjective feeling. Love isn't feeling warm towards another human being (that's nice, but it comes and goes). Love is sacrifice. Love burns. It kills your pride. Sooner or later love forces you to face your demons and weaknesses – which is why the desire to escape will sometimes be overwhelming, and why that door must be firmly shut. The second thing you need is preparation: a good long period, preferably chaste, a sheltered place when you can nurture trust like a potted sapling. Oh, and you need to feel "called" to marry; not everyone who does, is.
It's hard, nowadays, to find the wisdom and support to hear that call and follow it. The experience of divorce has deprived us of the equipment: we rush into a dream of eternity but end it after the first smashed plate. I could never have married without the Catholic church: its theology of marriage, its pastoral experience, and the nudge at the right time from holy people who know how God's grace works.
And here's the point. Marriage is a natural institution, one embedded in sacred tradition. It is founded on, and rooted in, the union of different genders; the "otherness" of maleness and femaleness fused in the sexual bond to forge a strange new creature which learns self-giving. It doesn't belong to the state, or even the church; it antedates them, and is prior to both. Archbishop Peter Smith is right:
"It is a lifelong commitment of a man and a woman to each other, publicly [and freely] entered into, for their mutual well-being and for the procreation and upbringing of children. No authority – civil or religious – has the power to modify the fundamental nature of marriage."
There are many kinds of loving, committed relationships. And it's good that the state supports them. It would have been much better if the legal privileges of the Civil Partnership Act of 2004 were not restricted to same-sex couples, but were available – as in France and Italy – to maiden aunts, marriage-phobic men and women, the disabled and their lifelong carers. It is right that people who commit themselves – lovingly, sometimes even sexually – to each other, and express that in stability and commitment, to have inheritance and hospital-visiting rights, tax breaks and the like.
But civil partnerships are not marriage. The last government made that clear when it said they could not be religiously solemnised. Implicit in that restriction was a final vestige of recognition that marriage is a natural institution, beyond the state or churches to redefine. Now a Conservative government (committed, now there's the irony, to restoring the vigour of civil society) wishes to use the power of the state to refashion the primary cell of civil society. Allowing churches to solemnise gay marriages is one of the most statist acts ever attempted by a government, and an assault on religious freedom.
The fact that Quakers and Unitarians are happy to host this government's totalitarian fantasy is neither here nor there; they have no more right to redefine marriage than has the state. Many things have been called marriage – polygamous unions, dynastic unions, same-sex partnerships – and you'll always find a pastor to bless them. But its intrinsic nature remains inviolable.
In the same way, many human partnerships look after and bring up children in stable and loving environments; people can survive, and benefit from, all kinds of upbringings. And there are many kinds of committed, and long-lasting, relationships. But only marriage takes these and adds an essential third element: the fusion of opposite genders. That's why no amount of Unitarian-officiated gay weddings and government "equality" drives can ever create something called "gay marriage" – however it's dressed up.

Other states may extend rights to gay couples

Gay wedding cake figures

Maryland's state senate is expected to begin debating the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Act on Wednesday -- it's one of several state legislative bodies across the country poised to extend rights to same sex couples.

Hawaii: Newly elected Democratic Gov. Neil Abercromie is expected to sign into law a bill allowing civil unions on Wednesday. The state's legislature has approved civil unions several times in the past only to have it vetoed by the previous Republican governor.

Rhode Island: Newly elected Gov. Lincoln Chafee, an Independent, says he will sign a same-sex marriage bill into law. Also, the Speaker of the House in RI is gay, and co-sponsored the measure. A bill has been heard in a House Judiciary Committee.

New York: Gov. Andrew Cuomo campaigned on same-sex marriage and said earlier this month he will push the New York state legislature to pass a measure. A similar bill failed last year in the senate  after passing in the state assembly. The New York Times notes that Cuomo has an uphill battle since the senate became more conservative after November's elections.

California: The state's supreme court said it will weigh-in on whether a ballot initiative that denied gay marriage should be overturned on procedural grounds. The CA court is not expected to rule until the end of the year.

Illinois: In January Illinois' governor signed into a law a civil unions bill for gay couples.

Same sex-marriage are allowed in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire and the District of Columbia.
Posted by Annie Linskey

Innkeepers Offering Gays-Only Accommodations Find Equality Cuts Both Ways


British innkeepers offering accommodations to gays only might find themselves on the wrong side of the law, an government commission charged with safeguarding legal equality warned.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission said that it was looking into businesses such as hotels and bed and breakfast inns that offered rooms to same-sex couples, but not to heterosexuals, reported British newspaper The Mirror on Feb. 21.

The Mirror article said that the Commission had not received any complaints from straights who had been turned away from establishments catering to gays. However, the Commission may take action against such inns even without receiving any such complaints.

The Mirror noted that a controversy erupted when a gay family was denied accommodation at a bed and breakfast run by a Christian couple who refused to allow the men to share a room with a single bed. The inn keepers claimed that the gay couple had set them up for a discrimination complaint.

The conflict arose in September of 2008, when Peter and Hazelmary Bull, proprietors of Chymorvah Private Hotel in Cornwall, refused to allow a same-sex couple, Steven Preddy and Martyn Hall, to share a double bed. The Christian couple said that their refusal had nothing to do with anti-gay sentiment, but rather was based in their belief that unmarried persons should not engage in sexual conduct. The Bulls claimed that if an unmarried heterosexual couple had arrived at their establishment, they, too, would have been denied a double bed.

Though British same-sex families are allowed to enter into civil unions, they are not granted full marriage equality. However, British law protects gays from discriminatory treatment in public accommodations, a statute that Christian innkeepers have said in previous cases constitutes an infringement on their religious freedoms.

The same-sex family took the Bulls to court, alleging illegal discriminatory treatment and seeking nearly $7,900 in damages. Bernie Quinn, an employee at the Bulls’ inn, told the court on Dec. 12 that he thought the gay couple had "set up" the Bulls, claiming that he had had a phone conversation with a "Mrs. Preddy" shortly before Mrs. Bull spoke with Mr. Preddy and booked a room with a double bed.

Mrs. Bull told the court that when she spoke with Mr. Preddy, she was under the weather. Due to her illness, she did not clarify in advance that the bed and breakfast had a policy regarding unmarried couples. Upon realizing her omission, Mrs. Bull said, "I said to Mr. Quinn that I had let a double room for tomorrow night and I had forgot to go through the policy with them and immediately Mr. Quinn reassured me that everything was going to be OK because of the previous phone call." Added Mrs. Bull, "I would have said immediately there is no way I would have let them make the journey to our door only to be disappointed."

Mrs. Bull also explained her and her husband’s religious beliefs to the court, saying, "We accept that the Bible is the holy living word of God and we endeavor to follow that." Part of the religious tradition to which the Bulls adhere includes a ban on premarital sex. For that reason, the Bulls’ lawyer told the court that their policy was "directed to sex and not sexual orientation and is lawful" because it treats heterosexuals and homosexuals the same.

Another piece of evidence offered by Quinn was a letter the inn had received from GLBT equality organization Stonewall about non-discrimination protections in the law. Stonewall told British GLBT news site Pink News that the letter had been sent not as a prelude to setting up the couple, but rather because Stonewall had received a complaint about the bed and breakfast due to its policies.

"Stonewall contacted the Chymorvah hotel in response to a complaint to our InfoLine from a caller about their discriminatory booking policy," said a Stonewall spokesperson. "We sent them a letter reminding them that the law had changed and what they were doing was illegal and offered to update them if necessary." Added the spokesperson, "The complaint to our InfoLine was unrelated and is entirely separate to the current court case."

The Bulls are being represented by The Christian Institute. Mike judge, who is with the Christian Institute, told the media, "This Christian couple are being put on trial for their beliefs. Equality laws are being used as a sword rather than a shield."

The country’s religious leaders also weighed in. "Mr. and Mrs. Bull’s understanding of marriage is the same as that of English law and the Christian Church," wrote the Bishop of Winchester, Michael Scott-Joynt, and the former Bishop of Rochester, Michael Nazir-Ali, both clerics with the Church of England, in a letter to the Telegraph. "Their guesthouse is also their home. Their policy may seem traditional but, of itself, there is nothing wrong with that." They added: "Liberty of conscience must not be confined to the mind. It is meaningless unless it includes the freedom to stand by our principles publicly."

There have been similar cases in which gay couples were turned away by inn keepers citing religious beliefs, most notably an incident one year ago in which Susanne Wilkinson, owner of the Swiss B&B, reportedly told Michael Black and his partner John Morgan that it was "against her convictions" to allow the men to share a room and refused them accommodations.

The two men, residents of Cambridgeshire, arrived at the Cookham B&B on March 19, only to be turned away. Black told the media, "[W]hen we got out of the car she was immediately distant and unfriendly and then she said, ’It’s a double room,’ and we said, ’Yes.’ She said, ’It’s a large double bed in a double room,’ and we said, ’Yes,’ and then she said it was against her convictions to let us stay."

The men protested being turned away and cited the anti-discrimination law, the article said. Wilkinson responded that the house was private property. "She said she was sorry and she was polite in a cold way and she was not abusive," said Black, "so we asked our money back and she gave it to us."

"They gave me no prior warning and I couldn’t offer them another room as I was fully booked," Wilkinson told the press, going on to add, "I don’t see why I should change my mind and my beliefs I’ve held for years just because the Government should force it on me."

"We were very shocked, and of course angry, that it happened," said Black. "Neither of us has ever experienced homophobia before and I have been out since 1974." Added Black, "We felt we were treated like lepers and not fit to be under the same roof as her." As for Wilkinson’s statement that she should have had "prior warning" that the men were a same-sex couple, Black said, "It would be like saying to someone who runs a guest house, ’I’m black or Muslim or blue-eyed,’ just in case they have a problem with it.

"There is no reason why we had to make it clear we were two men in this day and age," added Black. "We have stayed in plenty of guest houses in Britain and abroad and have never had a problem."

"In open-and-shut cases of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation the law’s quite clear," said Derek Munn, the director of public affairs for GLBT advocacy group Stonewall. "It’s illegal for businesses to turn away gay customers or discriminate against them when providing goods or services, and this can’t be overridden by personal prejudice."

"We are Christians and we believe our rights don’t have to be subordinated," said Wilkinson’s husband, Francis. "We have religious freedom and we are not judging that, but we are not prepared to have that sort of activity under our roof." Mr. Wilkinson said that he and his wife had "already been inundated with abusive calls and emails. It is really sad that people act like that."

Under Britain’s Equality Act of 2006, goods and services may not be denied on the basis of age, race, religion, or sexual orientation.

Gay resort hotels catering to gays may look to capitalize on the greater disposable income and the tendency to travel that some same-sex couples enjoy. In many instances, hotels that market to gays are up-front about their primary clientele, but do not turn away heterosexual families, thus side-stepping the issue of coming into conflict with anti-discrimination laws and allowing their guests to self-select.

One example is Hawaii’s Maui Sunseeker LGBT Resort--so named, owner Chuck Spence told EDGE, "so that we don’t get heterosexuals staying with us by mistake." But those straights who do book accommodations at the resort, which is located in Kihei, on Maui, are as welcome as anyone else. Said Spence, "Our police is not to discriminate against men, against women, against transsexuals, against anyone. We just want people to come and enjoy the property as it is, and have a good time on their vacations being themselves." (The Sunseeker was featured in a recent EDGE column and travel item.)

Spence told EDGE that only about 3% of the Maui Sunseeker’s clientele are heterosexual. "We do occasionally get comments from guests who are upset because there are heterosexuals on the property," Spence acknowledged. However, he added, "It’s not like we go out of our way to market to [straight travelers], and in fact it’s quite the opposite: we state clearly that we are catering to the gay and lesbian clientele but welcome all."

But some heterosexual guests prefer the Sunseeker, and have their reasons for doing so. "We find that generally the straight couples that come to stay with us know that the rooms will be fastidiously clean and [that we offer] a relaxed environment with a good group of clientele that they’ll have fun with," said Spence.

What’s more, "Even those who [guests] classify themselves as heterosexual aren’t necessarily completely heterosexual," Spence told EDGE. "Sometimes they do turn out to be bisexual insterad, and don’t necessarily make that known at the beginning."

The Maui Sunseeker’s policies regarding a universally welcoming acceptance of all guests regardless of sexuality is in alignment with Hawaii state laws regarding anti-discrimination in public accommodations and services, but even if those laws did not exist the Sunseeker would not turn away heterosexual guests. "It’s more our policy" than a matter of conforming to statute, Spence said. "It’s our philosophy and our belief" that no one should be excluded because of sexual orientation, "and it makes us an interesting mix and a fascinating vacation time for a lot of people who end of being friends with other guests even once they’ve left."

Added Spence, "We do have one couple that spends every anniversary with us since we opened because they just love the clientele and the hotel itself." With Hawaii’s legislature having approved civil unions for gay and lesbian families--and the state’s reputation as a scenic backdrop for wedding celebrations--anniversaries, honeymoons, and other such occasions may well be a growing part of what brings guests of all persuasions to the resort--and just in time: Spence told EDGE that the Sunseeker is soon to complete renovations that will expand the 17-room establishment to a 31-room facility complete with restaurant, pool, and full-service spa.

by Kilian Melloy  edgeboston.com

Australian short film finalist: Y2GAY



Stock your cupboards and prepare for Y2GAY.
A hilarious new short film from Australia documents the manic efforts of a hobbit-like homophobe as he prepares for the coming of "Y2GAY" in a bunker stocked with "straight non-perishables" and Ricky Martin DVDs. His wife is less than enthusiastic about her husband's obsession. 
The film was a finalist in Australia's Tropfest, the largest short film festival in the world.

Meet John Travolta as He is: Bold No hair piece


John Travolta Spotted Sans Hairpiece in Hawaii

John TravoltaFlynet
Wow, that hairpiece takes off and lands as often as his plane.
John Travolta was caught celebrating his 57th birthday in Hawaii with the fam—and without the normally lush head of hair he's always rockin'.
The clearly balding-on-top Pulp Fiction star went natural as he spent the day on the beach with wife Kelly Preston, and 10-year-old daughter, Ella Bleu, playing on the swings and enjoying the sand.
New baby Benjamin wasn't spotted outside with the family, but he probably wasn't far. We're sure John's wig wasn't either.





Michele Bachmann voted to kill AmeriCorps, the community service organization that her son opted to join


Thumbnail image for bachmann at palin rally yellow jacket.jpg
Mother knows best.
​Rep. Michele Bachmann has voted to defund AmeriCorps, the popular community service organization that her son opted to join in 2009.
Guess she showed him who's boss.
Harrison Bachmann went to work for the AmeriCorps program Teach for America in 2009, which specializes in placing educators in troubled schools and communities. Both organizations are run by the National Service Corp.
americorp.jpeg
​Americans helping other Americans out of a jam? Can't be having that, Bachmann once famously said.
I believe that there is a very strong chance that we will see that young people will be put into mandatory service. And the real concerns is that there are provisions for what I would call re-education camps for young people, where young people have to go and get trained in a philosophy that the government puts forward and then they have to go to work in some of these politically-correct forums. As a parent, I would have a very, very difficult time seeing my children do this.
Harrison did it anyway.
But mother knows best.
The GOP-controlled U.S. House has now voted 235-189 to defund the National Service Corp, for a $373 million savings -- when it passed H.R. 1, the continuing resolution to fund the government through the end of 2011.
H.R. 1 is the same bill that could defund Big Bird, while making sure NASCAR keeps its Army sponsorship. The Democratic-controlled Senate has yet to take up the measure.

February 21, 2011

Amazonians win landmark Chevron ruling


adamfoxie* is a couple of days late with this story, but I just caught it, it's an important one:

By Joseph Mayton 
Big oil company Chevron has been defeated. Ecuadorians’ 18-year battle against the multinational oil giant culminated on Monday in a landmark ruling that awards the thousands of civilians who fought for their rights $8 billion in damages. The Ecuador ruling has many celebrating what could have turned into another lost battle for the rights of local citizens in the face of injustices done by the hands of oil companies across the globe
The case is historic; not only because of the dollar amount but also it is the first time Indigenous peoples from the rainforest have sued an American oil company in the country where the crime was committed and won. The incredible 18-year fight against Chevron had sparked an outpouring of activists to the cause, including Sting and a successful documentary “Crude” was made that highlighted the destruction to the environment and human life Chevron had on the country.
This case could also set a precedent for corporate accountability, transforming the way oil companies operate around the globe.
Ecuador’s president, Rafael Correa, said on Tuesday that the court decision by a local judge that ordered U.S. oil giant Chevron to pay damages for pollution in the country’s Amazon was “important” for the country.
“It was the most important judgment in the history of the country,” he told reporters.
“The case really sends a message that companies operating in the undeveloped world cannot rely on a compliant government or lax environmental rules as a way of permanently insulating themselves from liability,” said Robert Percival, a law professor and director of the environmental law program at the University of Maryland School of Law in Baltimore, in comments published by Alternet.org.
But Chevron, the second largest U.S. oil company, has vowed to fight the ruling. The oil giant has repeatedly refused to pay for a clean up even if ordered to by the court.
A Chevron executive was quoted in local press as saying the company would not pay the fine until “hell freezes over.” But it is hard to dismiss the evidence on the ground for the destruction wreaked at its hands.
Children have been born with tumors soon after Chevron closed up shop in Ecuardor. Women began dying of cancer. Terrible oil-related diseases began ravaging the region. Texaco abandoned their oil fields in the early 90s, claiming to have remediated the damage. A lawsuit against the company was filed in 1993 on behalf of more than 30,000 indigenous and campesino people, whose lives had been torn apart by poisoned water, toxic soil, contaminated game, and hopelessness.
Granted Chevron was not the company doing the destroying, however, it was Texaco – which Chevron purchased in 2001 and took over the lawsuit. Either way, the human toll and the court ruling goes a long way toward the vindication many in Ecuador believe was a long way coming.
“These people have fought tooth and nail for their rights, for their chance to get health care and rebuild their communities,” said human rights lawyer Eduardo Solis from Uruguay, who has long been assisting the battle whenever he has spare time. He told Bikya Masr via email that the “battle is still going to rage on, but it is time for the US government to take action and show the world that court rulings will be upheld or there will be consequences. The people in Ecuador need it.”
BM

A Gay voice from Egypt’s Tahrir Square


 By Bikya Masr Staff 

If the ongoing Egyptian people’s revolution that toppled Hosni Mubarak in just 18 days — after 30 years of dictatorship — quickly engulfed the whole country, its beating heart was always Cairo’s Tahrir Square (in Arabic, “Liberation Square”), for many years a gay cruising mecca.
And gay people were among the millions of Egyptian citizens who made the revolution possible and joined the crowds who occupied the square to demand democracy and freedom from oppression.
This revolution was motored by young people through the Internet, and one of them was a well-educated, 22-year-old gay blogger and medical student who uses the pseudonym Ice Queer (“It’s a pun on ‘Ice Queen,’ as I’m a calm, cool person,” he explained). He was present in Tahrir Square during much of the protest, including last Friday, February 11, when Mubarak finally fell.
Ice Queer was an early participant in what has been dubbed the “Facebook revolution” that harnessed the social network to organize the first protests in Tahrir Square and elsewhere on January 25. But social networking was a means to an end. What motivations led Ice Queer to join this movement and help mobilize the demonstrations?
“Because we were fed up of Mubarak and his regime,“ he told Gay City News in an interview conducted through a series of email exchanges. “I started participating after I made sure that the protests didn’t have any political or religious agenda from any party and that all protesters are protesting because we are Egyptians and humans who have been oppressed for decades!
“Also it gave me and others a great sense of self, because for so many years most of the Egyptian society was undervaluing the power and enthusiasm of us, the youth! Everything that everyone did mattered, even those who showed up in Tahrir Square just to support and show solidarity.”
*
On his first day of protest in Tahrir Square, Ice Queer said, “I was holding a sign saying ‘Secular’ in Arabic, English, and French, and also my friends (straight, gay, girls, Christians, and Muslims) were holding similar signs, and we all were chanting that this protest is for the people and not for any party or religion.”
The multitudes in Tahrir Square reflected a veritable rainbow, as Ice Queer witnessed: “Gay, straight, Christian, Muslim, Atheist, Poor, Rich, Black, White, Nubian, Bedouin… EVERYONE was in Tahrir in a beautiful humanitarian image that I saw with my own eyes!”
Every step the Mubarak regime took — seesawing back and forth between violent repression and minor concessions — backfired, stiffening the protesters’ resolve to continue and swelling the crowds in Tahrir Square, Ice Queer said. Because he was on call in the hospital where he interns, he was not present in the square on the day Mubarak sent undercover police and thugs from the lumpenproletariat, paid 8 Euros a day, to attack the pro-democracy demonstrators with clubs, knives, and Molotov cocktails. With a tinge of regret, he wrote, “I don’t know if I should feel lucky or sorry that I wasn’t there on these days.”
But Ice Queer was fortunate, he said, to have been in Tahrir Square when Mubarak’s hand-picked vice president and notorious point man in the CIA’s rendition and torture program, Omar Suleiman, read a short statement on national television announcing that the dictator was stepping down and handing power over to the Military Council.
“On 11th of February, I was in Tahrir Square after Friday’s prayers,” he told this reporter, “and it was very peaceful as on most of the protests’ days. Shortly before the announcement of Omar Suleiman, I was on my way with my friends to grab a bite to eat from a place that’s about ten minutes away from the square, and while we were in the middle of that distance we heard a very loud cheer and cars joyfully tooting their horns. We couldn’t believe it because there was a ‘false alarm’ before, so we called our families for confirmation and we couldn’t have been happier!”
Unlike the previous day’s unrealized rumors that Mubarak would step down that evening, which had sent the square’s throngs into paroxysms of joy, Suleiman’s announcement on February 11 was for real.
“When we went back to the square, we were amazed!,” Ice Queer continued. “People were all hugging and congratulating each other, chanting ‘People indeed removed the system,’ ‘There is no people like the Egyptian people,’ and that ‘Mubarak should be prosecuted’. All the women started to do the popular Zaghrouta (ululation), some people were crying with joy, and some were dancing. Basically everyone was expressing his/ her joy the way he/ she knows to!
“For me, I was having goosebumps all of the time after Mubarak quit! I kept dancing and chanting with my friends and called my boyfriend to share the moment with him too.”
In contrast to the vast majority of Egyptian men who have sex with men — he guesses that “maybe five percent” of whom are out of the closet — Ice Queer self-identifies as gay and is out to his parents and friends, and frequently blogs on gay themes.
Homosexuals under Mubarak’s dictatorship lived under a cloud of fear, marked by waves of intensifying repression. A defining event in the regime’s crackdown was the May 11, 2001 arrest of the men known as the Cairo 52, when police raided a gay party being held aboard a floating nightclub, the Queen Boat, anchored in the Nile.
Although homosexuality is not strictly illegal in Egypt, of the 52 men arrested on the Queen Boat, 50 were charged with “habitual debauchery” and “obscene behavior” under Article 9c of Law No. 10 of 1961 on the Combat of Prostitution. The other two were charged with “contempt of religion” under Article 98f of the Penal Code. These laws have regularly been used to prosecute Egyptian gays, as has the Emergency Law — in place since Mubarak assumed the helm in the wake of Anwar Sadat’s assassination in 1981 – which gives the government the right to arrest people without charge, detain prisoners indefinitely, limit freedom of expression and assembly, and maintain a special security court.
The Cairo 52 were brutally beaten and tortured by police. In a series of hugely publicized trials — during which the uniformly homophobic Egyptian media sensationalized the Queen Boat incident and vilified the men arrested — nearly half of them received prison terms of three years. During the same crackdown, all gay websites were closed down, either by censorship of the Internet or by the arrest of those who ran them.
The persecution of the Cairo 52 was Mubarak’s attempt to throw a sop to the Islamist fundamentalist imams and the Muslim Brotherhood, who were campaigning against homosexuality.
Crackdowns on gays served another purpose as well. When critics of the regime disseminated rumors the dictator’s son, Gamal — whom he hoped to install as his successor as president — was gay, repression of queers was used by Mubarak to cauterize accusations that his government was guilty of “Western decadence.”
Arrests, brutality, and torture of gay men by police — designed, in part, to ferret out the names of other homosexuals — were common in the Mubarak years.
“They even used to make some of them a deal that they will let them go if they lead them to other homosexuals or if they work for them to trap other homosexuals online,” Ice Queer noted.
He went on to explain, “Mubarak knew very well how fear could make him fully control people. The Cairo 52 catastrophe is in the mind of every gay guy in Egypt. Whenever I go to or host a gay party, I always had to a certain degree the fear of ‘This could be another Queen Boat catastrophe.’ Although I wasn’t actively gay at the Cairo 52 time, I remember very well that time and how I was following the case in newspapers though I was only 12 and didn’t fully know about homosexuality back then.”
Ice Queer’s first sexual encounter occurred when “I was 13-14,” he said.
“My parents were away for summer vacation and I was home alone,” he recalled. “I chatted with someone on Yahoo chat and then I brought him home. It was a horrible experience — he was totally not my type, but thankfully it wasn’t hardcore.”
The young blogger elaborated, “I went through the phases of self-struggle like most gay guys, but what made me get quickly out of them into self-acceptance were my friends, reading, doubting, and questioning until I reached balance. I didn’t choose to come out to my parents. It’s a very long story, and they saw it coming anyway, as they indirectly asked me many times before whether I’m gay or not. They knew all along but were in denial and had no ‘evidence’ against me, until one day my sister and my mother confronted me with a chat history that I forgot to delete, so I had no other choice. Their reaction was very surprising actually, because I always thought it would be a disaster and that they would ground or violently punish me.
“They just sat me down and asked me if I was molested when I was a kid and whether I had sex or not, then they said, ‘It could be a psychological problem, would you like to see a shrink?’ and so I did! I saw my shrink for a year and half, then I stopped going and told my parents that I’m ‘cured.’ (You can check my blog posts about the whole experience starting January 2009).
“My closest straight friends knew way long before my parents because I was sick of living a lie and having to pretend to be someone else in front of them. Some of them are still my friends up till now and some are not. Their reactions were mostly positive, but some just tried to preach and gave me religious books because they don’t want me to ‘suffer’ and they wanted ‘what’s best for me.’ Anyhow girls’ reaction was much smoother than guys’.”
Ice Queer, like most self-accepting Egyptian gays, believes that winning the basic human rights of free speech, freedom of association, and freedom of the press are necessary preconditions to the educational process that alone can change hostile cultural attitudes toward same-sex love in Egypt. Now that Mubarak has fallen, this reporter asked him if he believes that raising the question of gay rights must wait until those freedoms are clearly and unalterably established.
“Totally!” he replied, adding, “We need first to realize basic human rights and establish a democratic secular atmosphere before fighting for our LGBT rights. In recent years, homophobia hasn’t really changed in our media, and the post-Mubarak Egypt will depend on which political party will rule.”
The optimism of the will that animated young Egyptians in overcoming their fears and launching protests that led to the revolution is evident in Ice Queer, who voiced no doubts about the army being held to its promises of full democracy.
“If we were able to get rid of Mubarak’s regime in 18 days, I guess we are able to do anything if we unite again for our freedom,” he declared.
What does Ice Queer want from the new, post-Mubarak Egypt?
“To always enjoy the ‘freedom’ that I’m enjoying in these days, to be able to express my point of view without censorship, to be living in a real secular country, to not fear that I’d be prosecuted one day because I’m gay or because I’m atheist,” he responded. “To simply be able to enjoy my humanity by all its means!”
But the army now in power has been part and parcel of the corrupt, repressive regime and owns hundreds of highly profitable businesses in the poisoned, top-heavy economic system from which its generals have profited handsomely. The Interior Ministry’s security apparatus — which numbers one and a half million paid agents and informers — has yet to be dismantled, and the draconian Emergency Law remains in full force.
Observers can only hope that the optimism of the Egyptian youth — as illustrated by Ice Queer’s confident enthusiasm — is not misplaced, and that the democratic revolution in which they believe will not be sabotaged, deformed, or debased by the country’s power elite in the months and years to come.
Ice Queer’s blog— which he could not update during much of the revolution due to the Mubarak regime’s shutting down of the Internet — is at http://confessions-room.blogspot.com/. The Human Rights Watch 2004 report on the Mubarak regime’s anti-homosexual campaign and the Cairo 52 incident, “In a Time of Torture: The Assault on Justice in Egypt’s Crackdown on Homosexual Conduct,” is online athrw.org/en/node/12167/section/2. Doug Ireland can be reached through his blog, DIRELAND, at direland.typepad.com.
** This was originally published in Gay City News

SEARCH This BLOG

Loading...

Amazon SearchBox/ Most Things You buy through here will give us a few cents

Popular Posts

The Forest Needs help

ONE

ONE
Relief World Hunger

Save The Lungs of The Earth

Orangutans ARE Part of the Forest

Love is Sharing

Pride Shack

Gay Male Pride Items #1 (Vertical Banner)

Click Here To Get Anything by Amazon- That will keep US Going

Young Love Collection

CDC

SiGn ThE PeTiTiOn

DVD's

HIV Army

Blog Archive