January 18, 2011

Why Facebook wants your phone number


Click to play
Explain it to me: Facebook privacy
 
   Facebook wants your address and mobile phone number.
But it's not sure exactly how to ask.
It's a complicated digital courtship, particularly because Facebook doesn't just want this data for itself -- it wants to "share" this info with all of its friends, which in this case happens to be app developers (think FarmVille, Compare People and Where I've Been -- all that non-Facebook stuff that pops up in your news feed).
That may sound confusing, but the debate over this Facebook phone-number-sharing -- which caused Facebook to backtrack a bit from the request after bloggers and users expressed outrage this weekend -- essentially comes down to two related questions:
Why does Facebook want your phone number and address?
And, based on what you think about that answer, is it in your interest to hand this personal information to the network?
Let's start with the first question.
Facebook -- perhaps obviously -- doesn't want to call you to chat, or stop by your house for tea. So what's its motive for asking for these personal details?
The social network says this info helps app developers create programs and games and little social widgets that make Facebook more fun and useful.
Potential examples: A travel app could send you text messages if your flight is going to be late; a shopping app wouldn't have to ask you where to send a gift you bought -- it would just send it to your default Facebook address.
In both of these instances, the advantage is convenience. You don't have to retype your address every time you use a shopping app. This is somewhat similar to how many internet users deal with Amazon or iTunes. You save your address and even credit card number so that purchases require one click.
But Facebook is different. Sharing phone numbers and addresses with Facebook means that data potentially could go out to an unvetted list of app developers, some of whom would trick users to get information that they could sell to advertisers or spammers, said Chester Wisniewski, senior security advisor of Sophos, a security company that's been critical of Facebook on this point.
This issue of what information app developers get and how is what stirred up all the controversy this weekend. Facebook announced late Friday -- so late that a blogger at All Facebook suggested the company was trying to hide the news -- that it was making "user's address and mobile phone number accessible as part of the User Graph object."
Ahem. So, basically, the company made it possible for users to give these personal details to app developers if they chose to do so.
The uproar that followed concerned how confusing this whole process is for average Facebook users.
"There is very little here to call attention to the fact that Facebook would now be sharing something that it previously did not share."
Facebook acknowledged these concerns in a blog post Tuesday. The company backpedaled from its earlier statement, saying it still wants to give developers access to phone numbers and addresses, but it hasn't figured out the best way to present this information in a clear way to the public.
Is Facebook privacy really an issue?
 
"On Friday, we expanded the information you are able to share with external websites and applications to include your address and mobile number. ... Over the weekend, we got some useful feedback that we could make people more clearly aware of when they are granting access to this data.
"We agree, and we are making changes to help ensure you only share this information when you intend to do so. We'll be working to launch these updates as soon as possible, and will be temporarily disabling this feature until those changes are ready. We look forward to re-enabling this improved feature in the next few weeks."
So that was a lot of setup to get to the heart of this section:
Why does Facebook want your phone number?
Part of it is that ease-of-use stuff. But the big-picture answer is that Facebook wants to be, like Google, a personalized center of the internet -- the hub that other websites must branch off from.
The site is on its way to being just that, since lists of users' friends, preferences and, increasingly, contact info are logged on this one website.
"By serving as a centralized identity provider, the social network makes registering for new sites as easy as a couple of clicks."
Now onto that second question:
Do you need to give this information to Facebook? Or do you want to?
Wisniewski, at Sophos, said that should be up to the individual.
But the real key, he said, is that Facebook should make it easy -- or at least possible -- for users to avoid giving up this info if they choose.
You can do that now. But you really have to know where to look.
If you don't want app developers, who could use your information to develop cool apps or could sell it to scammers, to know your address and phone number then don't give that information to Facebook in the first place.
Check your "account settings" to see whether you've already given up that information.
You also can control the information you give to app developer -- again, if you know what to look for. When you enable a new app, a "dialogue box" pops up on screen that lists the information you're about to give away.
Look carefully at that list and if you don't trust the app with that info, then don't approve it, Wisniewski said.
To see what info you've already given up to developers, go to "account," then "privacy settings" and then, at the bottom of the page, "apps and websites." You'll find a list of "apps you use." Click on "edit settings" and you get to look at that list, see what info you're giving over, to whom, and what info the app most recently accessed. Click on an individual app name and then on "show details" to see what data was most recently accessed.
For now, Wisniewski suggested erring on the side of caution:
"As far as advice goes, I certainly wouldn't share that information and don't see any reason for it to be stored anywhere but on my friends' cell phones, to be honest," he said.
Others are more comfortable with the idea of sharing info with apps.
The blog Inside Facebook writes:
"Most critics have immediately focused on how greedy developers will request the data in order to spam users, which is a valid concern. But the access will also enable the creation of apps that keep friends connected via SMS and facilitate e-commerce by pre-populating delivery details.
"Though the risks are high, Facebook should not impede innovation for fear of spammers, but instead push forward while minimizing negative outcomes by helping users make more informed decision(s)."
 Posted:

Iran is to Execute two Young Men for Homosexuality by Stoning

Two young men who filmed themselves having sex have been sentenced to death by stoning in Iran. The film was discovered on the mobiles of Ayub and Mosleh, 20 and 21 years old, by agents of the Iranian regime in the Kurdistan city of Piranshahr in northwest Iran.

Pictures of President Ahmadinejad and a headshot of Supreme Leader Khamenei pasted over a donkey were allegedly incorporated into the film. Reports say that the stoning was immediately ordered for this Friday “to instill fear in the people of Iran”.

News of the sentence originates from a Kurdish newspaper and has been distributed by The International Committee Against Stoning, who launched the worldwide campaign against the stoning of Sakineh Ashtiani for adultery. It has since been confirmed by other sources.

Iranian LGBT activists and human rights organizations have reported a number of other death sentences for homosexuality in the past two years. However the Iranian government maintains that “most of these individuals have been charged for forcible sodomy or rape.” The original newspaper report claimed that the boys raped another.
Soheila Vahdati, an independent human rights worker for Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and the Iranian Queer Organization based in San Francisco, said: “They don’t differentiate between rape and homosexual acts. As well, there is a culture of shame. The families won’t defend their loved ones from this brutal punishment.”

“We are very concerned even though we haven’t got all the details. We’ll try to save their lives but unfortunately Iran has quickly executed people in the past.” Judges order execution by stoning under a 1983 law detailing offences proscribed by God, and then under the general Islamic penal code. Some senior Shia clerics have spoken out against stoning.

The International Committee Against Stoning have urged “the young people of Piranshahr to hasten to the aid of Ayub and Mosleh and declare that they will not permit this tragedy to occur.”

The Association of British Muslims, alongside an international coalition of Muslim organisations, has condemned the sentence and said that they do not see anything in the Koran to justify such punishment.

They said: “Allah says in the Holy Qur’an, “…if anyone slays a human being unless it be [in punishment] for murder or for spreading corruption on earth – it shall be as though he had slain all mankind; whereas, if anyone saves a life, it shall be as though he had saved the lives of all mankind…””

Last month Human Rights Watch published a large scale report on the repression of LGBT in Iran. It said that those charged with same-sex offenses stand little chance of receiving a fair trial.

There are few reliable statistics on the frequency with which stonings take place in Iran. Recent years have seen a rising number of cases reported. Some members of parliament are reportedly hoping that the Supreme Leader will pass a fatwa against stoning.

FYI, source – This is the original Kurdish news and its translation on Facebook in Farsi. soheila -
http://www.facebook.com/permalink.ph...h/493211579002

A Special Thank you to Paul canning for keeping these stories in the news.

Melanie Nathan
LezGetReal...

http://www.actup.org/forum
Re-post on adamfoxie*International

Sexual Orientation Change Efforts’ Have Been Met with Alarm!

Gay Couples Counseling Marriage
Reports of a Christian registered psychotherapist using ‘Sexual Orientation Change Efforts’ have been met with 

alarm by the British Humanist Association (BHA). Mrs Lesley Pilkington faces a disciplinary hearing by the British Association of Psychology and Counselling this week after being reported for trying to ‘convert’ a gay man to being heterosexual.
Pilkington is reported as saying she uses a biblical framework in an attempt to alter the sexual orientation of patients, believing that everybody is heterosexual but some people have a homosexual problem". When questioned by the undercover journalist Patrick Strudwick whether homosexuality was "a mental illness, an addiction or an anti-religious phenomenon’", Pilkington is reported to have replied "It is all of that".
Pilkington is being supported by the Christian Legal Centre which "exists to promote Christian Truth in the public arena and to protect the freedom of Bible-believing Christians’" The Christian Legal Centre has supported a number of cases of alleged unfair dismissal on religious grounds. Recent cases include those of Duke Amachree, Gary MacFarlane and Lillian Ladele, all of whom lost their cases and were not found to be victims of unlawful religious discrimination.
Naomi Phillips, BHA's Head of Public Affairs commented: "The notion that homosexuality is a problem that may be ‘cured’ is profoundly objectionable and wrong. It is nothing short of brutal that a therapist would attempt to change a patient’s sexual orientation.
"It is vital that unsubstantiated and potentially harmful methods cannot be allowed to masquerade as a legitimate practice, and where, regrettably, ‘conversion therapy’ continues to exist, it is not subsidised by public funds. We are pleased that Royal College of Psychiatrists has condemned this practice, and that this case is currently under investigation."
www.ekklesia.co.uk

Melissa Etheridge is 'Happy' after Finding Love Again But Her Ex Is Not



Melissa Etheridge is 'happy' in her new relationship with Nurse Jackie creator Linda Wallem.
The 50-year-old split with Tammy Lynn Michaels last year and she is now dating Wallem, also 50.
'Melissa and Linda have been best friends for over 10 years,' a source tells America's People magazine. They got together three months after Melissa and Tammy broke up.' 
New romance: Melissa Etheridge is now in a relationship with Nurse Jackie creator Linda Wallem
New romance: Melissa Etheridge is now in a relationship with Nurse Jackie creator Linda Wallem
New romance: Melissa Etheridge is now in a relationship with Nurse Jackie creator Linda Wallem
Wallem was said to be Etheridge's 'best man' when she married Tammy in the 2003 ceremony.
Etheridge was spotted with Wallem at the Emmys together in August last year and the friend says they 'are in a committed relationship'.
Michaels, 35, has accused Melissa of cheating on her and moving Wallem into their home just after she moved out.
Ex factor: The singer split from Tammy Lynn Michaels last year
Ex factor: The singer split from Tammy Lynn Michaels last year
She wrote on her blog: 'i moved out november 23rd 2009... she said it would help...i was convinced it would too... and i trusted there was... no one else... i didn't know... there was someone moving in... as i was moving out."
The pair are parents to four-year-old twins Johnnie Rose and Miller. 
Etheridge and Michaels, 35, both iconic gay rights activists in the US, had a commitment ceremony back in 2003 and registered as legal domestic partners in the state of California.   
There were reports they tried to legally marry in 2008 - during the time when same-sex marriages were permitted in California - but they missed the window.


 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz

In D.C., The March to Gay Marriage Rights Continues Unabated

The Supreme Court today declined to review an appellate court decision that essentially upholds gay marriage in the District of Columbia. Some anti-gay activists in the District have been pushing for a ballot initiative on gay marriage—essentially arguing to put it to a popular vote. The D.C. Court of Appeals ruled that an initiative banning gay marriage can’t be subjected to a popular vote because it would, itself, violate the District’s Human Rights Act.

So gay marriage, which became legal in the District of Columbia just last spring, continues unabated. Thus far, neither the nation’s capital nor the institution of marriage have fallen apart. Indeed, what has been most remarkable for me, as a D.C. resident, is how utterly uneventful the rise of gay marriage has been. The City Council passed it, a very small minority of people protested, there was a quick surge at the courthouse, which had to work through a backlog of gay marriage demand, and, well, that was about it.
Opponents of gay marriage are, at this point, in a race against the clock. Popular opinion is changing rapidly, and you don’t have to be Nostradamus to understand that gay marriage is going to be universally recognized in America in my lifetime. Americans born after 1980 support gay marriage rights by a fairly wide margin, and hard core opposition is increasingly limited to the old and to self-identified Republicans (even the independents are moving, rapidly, toward equal rights).
In California, where Prop 8 passed (barely) in 2008, public sentiment shifted the other way in less than two years. And even President Obama, finger firmly in the wind, said just before Christmas that his views on gay marriage are “evolving.” You bet they are; nothing evolves faster than a politician reading poll numbers.  
A day after Martin Luther King, Jr., Day, it is interesting to contemplate the march of civil rights in this country. The courts and popular sentiment play off each other; what is rational in the eyes of the court depends in some measure on the views of the public. And while this march has never been fully linear, when viewed over the trajectory of decades, it has been inexorable. The rights Dr. King fought for seem, in hindsight, so self-evident that it’s hard today to imagine the opposition he faced. Forty years from now, we will say the same thing about gay marriage.
By KEVIN HUFFMAN on http://www.usnews.com

Kylie Coming to South Florida For Her 'Aphrodite'


International pop sensation Kylie Minogue has announced North American dates for her Aphrodite – Live 2011 World Tour beginning April 28 in Montreal. Kylie will perform at the Bank Atlantic Center on May 7, in what promises to be a groundbreaking performance. Tickets go on sale this weekend and are sure to go fast!
“The reaction to ‘Aphrodite’ has been absolutely incredible and has inspired me and my creative team to develop a new show that will take all of us on a euphoric journey of joy, excitement and glamour. I can’t wait to get on the road and see all my fans in 2011,” said Kylie.
In the fall of 2009 Kylie stormed America to sell out her first ever North American tour. The 6-city tour kicked off in Oakland and made stops in Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Chicago,Toronto and New York, wowing fans and critics alike at each stop. Entertain- ment Weekly called the show a “two-hour post-disco fantasia of strobe, bass, and glitter—an all-out spectacle.”
Kylie’s eleventh album Aphrodite was released in July and debuted at #19 in the U.S., marking her highest U.S. chart position since 2002’s Fever. Aphrodite became Ky- lie’s fifth #1 album in the UK, hitting the top spot a full 22 years to the week since her debut album Kylie entered the chart. The album also made Kylie the first solo artist in the history of the UK charts to have a #1 album in four different decades.
The new single “Get Outta My Way” recently hit the top of the U.S. Billboard Club Chart, marking her second consecutive #1 Billboard Club single from Aphrodite fol- lowing “All The Lovers” and her fifth career #1 club single to date.
WRITTEN BY JOEY AMATO
http://www.southfloridagaynews.com

SEARCH This BLOG

Loading...

Amazon SearchBox/ Most Things You buy through here will give us a few cents

Popular Posts

The Forest Needs help

ONE

ONE
Relief World Hunger

Save The Lungs of The Earth

Orangutans ARE Part of the Forest

Love is Sharing

Pride Shack

Gay Male Pride Items #1 (Vertical Banner)

Click Here To Get Anything by Amazon- That will keep US Going

Young Love Collection

CDC

SiGn ThE PeTiTiOn

DVD's

HIV Army

Blog Archive