October 3, 2010

After recent string of suicides, Authorities Aim to Prevent




 
The George Washington Bridge seen from the New York City side of the span. Rutgers University freshman Tyler Clementi, 18, jumped to his death off the bridge, Sept. 22.NEW YORK — Eighteen-year-old Tyler Clementi
 typed his intention to millions on the Internet: "Jumping off the gw bridge sorry." His body was 
found days later floating in the Hudson River beneath the George Washington Bridge.
Chef Joseph Cerniglia, a contestant on the reality cooking show "Kitchen Nightmares," also 
jumped from the iconic bridge in the past two weeks. His restaurant was mired in debt, though 
beginning to make a comeback.
In March, Yale University student Cameron Dabaghi jumped from the Empire State Building's
 86th-floor observation deck. He had written a note beforehand saying he was sorry and would 
be jumping from either the George Washington Bridge or the totemic skyscraper.

Those who choose to end their lives in public, dramatic fashion often pick landmarks — from 
the George Washington Bridge overlooking Manhattan and the Palisades, to the Golden Gate
 Bridge, with its sweeping views of the Pacific Ocean and the San Francisco Bay.
Authorities are looking at how to prevent the public deaths with everything from concrete barriers, 
suicide hot line phones or safety nets hanging from bridges.
The measures would have made a difference for Kevin Hines, who survived a leap from the 
746-foot Golden Gate Bridge in 2000.
"I would never have jumped off that bridge" if he found obstructions in the way, he said.
In New York, few city landmarks with the potential to become suicide hot spots are as accessible
 as the George Washington Bridge, which has a pedestrian path and a low railing.
The Empire State Building has a 10-foot-high safety fence and an abundance of security guards, 
but more than 30 people have leaped from it to their deaths since it opened in 1931. The Brooklyn 
Bridge, which also has seen fatal jumps this year, has an easy-to-get-to pedestrian walkway, but it 
hangs over lanes of vehicle traffic rather than water.
New York City police responded to over 640 reports of people either jumping or threatening to jump
 from buildings or bridges as of Aug. 31, NYPD spokesman Pual Browne said — a 27% increase over
 the same period last year.
The police have officers trained to talk down and grab would-be jumpers and deploy air bags in
 the streets to catch people threatening to jump from buildings.
A dozen telephones are installed along the pedestrian walkways on the George Washington 
Bridge that patch potential jumpers through to suicide hot lines. The phones are near signs that say,
 "Need help?" in both English and Spanish.
Dr. John Draper, project director of the National Suicide Prevention Hot Line in New York, says
 a simple concrete barrier is a much better suicide deterrent on a bridge than a telephone.
"We've seen on bridges that people don't really call hot lines in high numbers," he said.
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which owns the bridge, would not release 
information on the number of people who have jumped from the span, saying it's impossible to 
determine the exact count. But Port Authority spokesman Steve Sigmund said the agency is
 "continuing to partner with mental health experts to further strengthen" it prevention efforts.
Psychologists who study suicide say the landmarks can become attractive ways out for 
emotionally disturbed people wanting to die.
"When they think about dying in this way, they may have some degree of magical thinking, 
knowing that it is very likely their death will get publicity and media attention," said 
Dr. Alan L. Berman, executive director of the Washington-based American Association of 
Suicidology.
Hines, now 29, who suffers from bipolar disorder, told The Associated Press that he had 
believed the jump would be less painful than other forms of death, and less frightening 
than taking pills. He decided after doing research on the Internet that "the only option 
was a bridge."
By conservative estimates, 1,300 people have jumped to their deaths from the Golden Gate 
Bridge since it opened in 1937. At least 29 people leaped last year, and eight have committed 
suicide there through July this year, according to bridge officials. Transportation authorities
 voted two years ago to hang stainless steel nets from the bridge to deter suicides, although
 funding for the $50 million project remains elusive.
Most jumpers suffer a grisly death, with massive internal injuries, broken bones and skull
 fractures. Some die from internal bleeding. Others asphyxiate from drowning.
Hines said his leap was anything but painless.
"This image that you just free-fall into an abyss is just a joke," he said.
Draper, of the suicide hot line network, said that popular opinion aside, research shows that
 barriers making the jumps from high places impossible will prevent the public suicides.
"Many people are under the impression that if you just put up a barrier they will find another way 
to kill themselves. It's an argument that people will make against putting up a barrier," 
Draper says. "And it's myth."
Online:
Contributing: Associated Press writers Amy Westfeldt and Tom Hays, news researchers
 Monika Mathur and Barbara Sambriski and Sudhin Thanawala in San Francisco
 contributed to this report.

Bookmark and Share

Why Anti-Gay Bullying is a Theological Issue


When I heard about the death of 15-year-old Billy Lucas early in September, I was terribly saddened. It is a tragedy when a young person completes suicide in the aftermath of daily torment and harassment. After this, I sat in stunned silence in front of my computer screen as news stories continued to appear about the suicides of 13-year-old Asher Brown, 18-year-old Tyler Clementi, 13-year-old Seth Walsh, and 19-year-old Raymond Chase. Today, it is very clear to me that profound sadness and stunned silence is no longer a suitable, appropriate or adequate response.

From Lamentation to Indignation

My sadness began to change into something different with each successive news story about another gay teen hanging himself, shooting himself, and jumping off of a bridge. As I saw the faces of these young victims and imagined the family and friends left to cope with the chaos of their suicides, my lamentation began to morph into an indignant fury.

My indignation grew as I shifted my gaze from the individual acts of suicide to the contexts in which these suicides are set. Suicide takes place for numerous reasons. Some seek relief from enduring physical and psychological pain that seems infinitely unrelenting and others after severe bouts of depression. These teens, however, were not seeking relief from some persistent, internal state of depression or physical illness. The pain they faced had an external source — the cruel, unremitting, merciless, pounding of daily humiliation, taunting, harassment and violence.

And all of this pain visited upon these young lives because of one thing they had in common: they were not heterosexual.

These suicides are not acts of “escape” or a “cop-out” from facing life. When LGBT people resort to suicide, they are responding to far more than the pain of a few individual insults or humiliating occurrences. When LGBT people complete suicide it is an extreme act of resistance to an oppressive and unjust reality in which every LGBT person is always and everywhere at risk of becoming the target of violence solely because of sexual orientation or gender identity. They are acts of resistance to a perceived reality in which a lifetime of violence and abuse seems utterly unavoidable.

The landscape upon which LGBT teen suicide is set calls for far more than our sympathy and sadness. There are times in which it is important to be guided to action by our anger. This is one of those times.

From Interpersonal Violence to Group Subjugation

Our response to bullying is a response to violence. Beyond the inflicting of individual pain, violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people has effects far beyond the individual target. This is what Iris Marion Young terms “systematic violence” in her famous “Five Faces of Oppression.” It is a violence of instrumentality — violence with the effect of keeping an entire group subjugated and in a state of oppression.

Young argues, “Members of some groups live with the knowledge that they must fear random, unprovoked attacks on their persons or property, which have no motive but to damage, humiliate, or destroy the person”.* The only thing one must do to become victimized is to be a member of a particular group (e.g. to be gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender). We must widen our perspective from individual acts of bullying and violence to the instrumental purpose these serve in subjugating LGBT people to particular religious and cultural ideologies in which reality is defined from a strictly heterosexual perspective — and gay and lesbian people become non-persons.

As more churches and denominations ordain gay and lesbian clergy, more gay and lesbian people are featured in media, and more medical, psychological and psychotherapeutic organizations reject notions of the pathological in sexual minorities, dominant religious and cultural ideology is in a state of crisis. It is no longer an unquestioned assumption that heterosexual experience represents the definition of reality for all people. The power to define reality for the masses is at stake and this power comes will all manner of populitical and ideological implications. Thus, there is a vested interest on the part of the religious and political right in keeping LGBT persons silent and subjugated.

Whereas political rallying on issues like same-sex marriage and the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell serve to maintain some ground on the preservation of anti-gay cultural ideology, the intermittent reinforcement of violent attack is an even better tool to ensure the silence (and suicide) of LGBT people and their subjugation to the closet.

While a majority of LGBT people may avoid ever becoming the victim of a violence, none will be able to avoid the psychic terror that is visited upon LGBT people with each reminder that this world is one in which people are maimed and killed because of their sexual and gender identities. It is this psychic terror that makes life so difficult for many LGBT people. It is this psychic terror that does the heavy lifting of instrumental, systematic violence. It intends to silence and to destroy from within.

While most of us will never be physically attacked by another human being, all of us know we are targets.

A theology of anti-gay bullying

Anti-gay bullying is a theological issue because it has a theological base. I find it difficult to believe that even those among us with a vibrant imagination can muster the creative energy to picture a reality in which anti-gay violence and bullying exist without the anti-gay religious messages that support them.

These messages come in many forms, degrees of virulence, and volumes of expression. The most insidious forms, however, are not those from groups like Westboro Baptist Church. Most people quickly dismiss this fanaticism as the red-faced ranting of a fringe religious leader and his small band of followers.

More difficult to address are the myriad ways in which everyday churches that do a lot of good in the world also perpetuate theologies that undergird and legitimate instrumental violence. The simplistic, black and white lines that are drawn between conceptions of good and evil make it all-too-easy to apply these dualisms to groups of people. When theologies leave no room for ambiguity, mystery and uncertainty, it becomes very easy to identify an “us” (good, heterosexual) versus a “them” (evil, gay).

Additionally, hierarchical conceptions of value and worth are implicit in many of our theological notions. Needless to say, value and worth are not distributed equally in these hierarchies. God is at the top, (white, heterosexual) men come soon after and all those less valued by the culture (women, children, LGBT people, the poor, racial minorities, etc.) fall somewhere down below. And it all makes perfect sense if you support it with a few appropriately (mis)quoted verses from the Bible.

With dualistic conceptions of good and evil and hierarchical notions of value and worth, it becomes easy to know who it is okay to hate or to bully or, seemingly more benignly, to ignore. And no institutions have done more to create and perpetuate the public disapproval of gay and lesbian people than churches.

If anti-gay bullying has, at any level, an embodied undercurrent of tacit theological legitimation, then we simply cannot circumvent our responsibility to provide a clear, decisive, theological response. Aside from its theological base, anti-gay bullying is a theological issue because it calls for acts of solidarity on behalf of the vulnerable and justice on behalf of the oppressed.

But this imperative to respond reminds us that the most dangerous form of theological message comes in the subtlest of forms: silence.

The longer we wait, the more young people die

There is already a strong religious presence in the debate around anti-bullying education in schools. Unfortunately, it is not a friendly voice for LGBT teens. There is also no lack of rhetoric on sexuality stemming from theological sources. But the loudest voices are not the voices of affirmation and embrace. In a recent article, I urged churches that rest comfortably in a tacitly welcoming or pseudo-affirming position to come out and publicly proclaim their places of worship as truly welcoming and affirming sanctuaries for people of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities.

I cannot count the number of times I have heard well-meaning, good-hearted people respond to this appeal, saying, “Things are a lot better for gay people today than they were several years (or decades) ago. In time, our society (or churches) will come around on this issue.” To these friends and others, I must say, “It’s time.” For Lucas, Brown, Clementi, Walsh, and Chase the time is up. For these teens and the myriad other bisexual, transgender, lesbian and gay youth lost to suicide, the waiting game hasn’t worked so well.

As simply as I can state the matter: The longer we wait to respond, the more young people die.

If this were a hostage situation, we would have dispatched the SWAT team by now. And in many ways, it is. Our children and teenagers are being held hostage by a religious and political rhetoric that strives to maintain the status quo of anti-gay heterosexist normativity. The messages of Focus on the Family and other organizations actively strive to leave the most vulnerable among us exposed to continuous attack. The good news is that we don't need a SWAT team. We just need quality education on sexuality and gender identity in our schools and more faithful and courageous preaching and teaching in our churches.

Catholic theologian M. Shawn Copeland offers profound words to any individuals and churches seeking to wash their hands of this issue. She states,

“If my sister or brother is not at the table, we are not the flesh of Christ. If my sister’s mark of sexuality must be obscured, if my brother’s mark of race must be disguised, if my sister’s mark of culture must be repressed, then we are not the flesh of Christ. For, it is through and in Christ’s own flesh that the ‘other’ is my sister, is my brother; indeed, the ‘other’ is me…”

If anti-gay bullying is a theological issue, perhaps what is called for is a creative theological response. A theological response that challenges the systematic violence that upholds an oppressive religious and cultural ideology will not be a response through which we can hedge our bets. It will be a full-bodied, whole-hearted giving of ourselves to the repair of the flesh of Christ divided by injustice and systematic exclusion.

Ministers who remain in comfortable silence on sexuality must speak out. Churches that have silently embraced gay and lesbian members for years must publically hang the welcome banner. How long will we continue to limit and qualify our messages of acceptance, inclusion and embrace for the most vulnerable in order to maintain the comfort of those in our communities of faith who are well served by the status quo?

In the current climate, equivocating messages of affirmation are overpowered by the religious rhetoric of hatred. Silence only serves to support the toleration of bullying, violence and exclusion. In the face of what has already become the common occurrence of LGBT teen suicide, how long can we wait to respond?

*Young, Justice and the Politics of Difference. p. 61

**Copeland, Enfleshing Freedom. p. 82


CODY J. SANDERS
Religion Dispatches...
http://www.actup.org
Bookmark and Share

Coming Out Young


One of the single-most defining moments in each of our lives is that first step we take towards coming out. We each have experienced that awakening of our cognitive awarenesses in our little gay hearts that finally gives way to an actual, overt pronunciation of our sexual and gender identities. That "aha" moment seems to be coming sooner and sooner for LGBT people.
It may be difficult to discern just how young LGBTQ kids are coming out today compared to previous generations, but several tell-tale signs show the trend pointing towards an identification with a particular orientation at age 11, 12 , and 13. “It does appear that youth are coming out at earlier ages,” offers Daryl Presgraves, Public Relations Manager of GLSEN. “The world has changed dramatically in the past generation, and it is hard to overestimate the impact that has had on LGBT youth,” Presgraves adds.
Indeed, those now in their 20’s and 30’s may have come out during high school or college and older generations report their coming out in their 20’s and 30’s, or older. Today’s youth are coming out not in college or even high school, but in junior high school. "Harassment is more pronounced in middle school than in high schools,” observes Byard, “because you see a lot of issues coming into play as students reach adolescence. Middle school years are when one's individual identity comes into focus."
A Benior Denizet-Lewis piece in a September 2009 New York Times Magazine article, “Coming Out in Junior High School,” observed acutely the trending towards earlier recognition and expression of sexual identity. In the article Denizet-Lewis recounts his  observations as he follows around 13-year old Oklahoma native, Austin, a young adolescent who is out and proud, with regular attendance at a community center that offers services for LGBTQ youth, and even a boyfriend to boot. Austin was 11 years old when he decided he couldn’t stay in the closet his whole life and made plans to come out to his family and school mates and others. For those of us that had these conversations with ourselves in our late teens or twenties or thirties or older, cases like Austin's may come as a shock - and a relief - that the next generation of gay children have voices that are being heard at younger and younger ages- and in increasingly rural and formerly homophobic places.
“A good school is a good school no matter where,“ said Byard. Park School, a progressive primary K-12 school in Brookline, Massachusetts started a GSA in their middle school five years ago. “We're proud of our middle school GSA, believe in the importance of addressing LGBTQ issues with middle school students, and would like to share our experiences with others,” offered GSA faculty advisors Katherine Callard and Alan Rivera. 13-year old Shakeena (whose name has been changed, as she would like to remain anonymous) attends a public middle school in Brooklyn and is a member of the GSA. "I think it's important to have a gay-straight alliance so that we can know that our peers support us and we can have security. You know that they got our back."
More than 120 junior high schools across the country have formed GSAs, with 4,700 schools total registered with GLSEN, and each year the number of students participating in the Day of Silence, the national day where students remain silent in school to symbolize the impact of anti-gay discrimination, increases.
The significance of folks coming out younger is not simply a positive byproduct of increased exposure to LGBTQ people in pop culture or the average earlier age at which kids are encountering sexual experiences. Rather, this phenomenon only begins to accommodate what for decades has been the burden of our community and the disproportionate number of teenage suicides due to one’s sexuality or presumed sexuality and the inability to express it in one’s home, school, or community. More than 80% of LGBTQ middle school students, in fact, as per a 2007 GLSEN survey, reported that they had been harassed because of their sexual identity.
Today, we have Hilary Duff and Wanda Sykes featured in GLSEN and the Ad Council's “Think Before You Speak” campaign, targeted at teens to help promote increased tolerance of LGBTQ youth. We have Saturday morning TV shows on network television with a gay kid not as a stock character, but rather as one of the main actors. Issues that face gay youth are being addressed in a more honest and representational way on the screen than ever before.
GLSEN represents, perhaps, the epitome of ongoing efforts to protect our nation’s gay youth. The organizational aims to help keep students safe and, “envisions a world in which every child learns to respect and accept all people, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity/expression.” GLSEN is presently working with the National Safe Schools Partnership to secure protection for students from bullying on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity/expression with schools that receive federal funding from the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools. There are presently only 12 states that have laws protecting students on the basis of sexual and gender identity.
What will it mean to have kids come out even earlier? How about as early as Elementary school? The question begs, if the trend continues, will we eventually reach a point when we will no longer need to “come out” but rather everyone just is and all are encouraged to nurture their unique identities- whatever they may be- from the earliest conceivable age? This idealized paradigm is certainly not one that we’re likely to see in the short-term, but we might be just fine settling for increased acceptance and a decrease in the number of related suicides and murders.
"It's important not to forget the responsibility adults have," said Byard. While progressive students are doing much towards their own plight, we must remember that there is much work that needs to be done to further our efforts so that it might one day be safe for all LGBTQ youth to come out. Go research your own junior high school to see if a GSA currently exists and, if not, perhaps you can aid in setting one up!
Photo credit: albany_tim
Allison Hope is a writer and multimedia artist living in New York City.

Bookmark and Share

GLAAD Touts The New “Gays On TV” Season While UK Survey Reveals Viewer Gay Angst

 Lyndon Evans  

While GLAAD is touting and celebrating its Diversity Report for TV and the 2010-2011 TV season, At the launch of the 2010-2011 television season, GLAAD estimates that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) scripted characters represent 3.9% of all scripted series regular characters on the five broadcast networks: ABC, CBS, The CW, Fox, and NBC. This is slightly more than last year, with 23 series regular characters identified as LGBT.
After a two year decline, the number of LGBT series regulars on cable has made a healthy rebound.  A total of 35 series regulars were counted this year; up from 32 in 2008, and 25 last year, the BBC has commissioned a report which finds almost one in five in the UK are uncomfortable with having homosexuals portrayed on television.
A survey found that 18% feel “uncomfortable” or “very uncomfortable” with it, even after the 9pm watershed. Just under half of respondents said they were either comfortable or ambivalent.
Around a fifth of straight people said there was too much content relating to gay people on TV generally, although 46% said the volume was about right. Many lesbians felt there were not enough gay women on TV and most were portrayed either as “butch” or “lipstick lesbians”.
Gay men said they would welcome a more realistic portrayal of gay life and criticised a tendency to feature camp men, though they said this was improving.
The research also found that landmark gay storylines were regarded as hugely important by gay respondents. Gay characters on soaps such as EastEnders and Coronation Street were also seen as important. The study is one the biggest of its kind, based on a survey of more than 1,600 people and discussion groups involving 500. A BBC public consultation had more than 9,400 responses. The findings will shape coverage for years to come and could lead to the introduction of more lesbian characters in the corporation’s dramas. – Source – Guardian UK http://focusontherainbowopine.outloudblogs.com

Bookmark and Share

No Move To CBS For Anderson Cooper He Reups With CNN And Gets A TV Deal



 Lyndon Evans  
It was announced on Thursday that CNN has an extended contract with Anderson Cooper as CNN President Jim Walton said in a released statement,“I am pleased that Anderson Cooper has extended his relationship with CNN and will be with us for years to come. I am also pleased to congratulate Anderson on his new relationship with Telepictures. We think it will be good for Anderson, good for CNN and good for Time Warner.”
Regarding the new daytime TV deal with Warner Brothers and Telepictures a press release said in part, Anderson Cooper has signed a deal to host a new, one-hour daily daytime strip, set for national syndication launch in Fall 2011, it was announced today by Ken Werner, President, Warner Bros. Domestic Television Distribution, and Hilary Estey McLoughlin, President, Telepictures Productions.
AC was quoted in the release, “Over the course of the past few years, I’ve had the opportunity to work on a number of daytime programs,” said Anderson Cooper. ” It’s fun and interesting to work in daytime television. The format is unique and you can really go in-depth on a wide range of fascinating and compelling stories. With this new program I hope to relay important information and relate to people and the audience in a completely different way. It’s an exciting opportunity to show another side of myself and create something worthwhile and special in daytime.”
http://focusontherainbowopine.outloudblogs.com


Bookmark and Share

College Football’s Top 6 Hotties of 2010

SEARCH This BLOG

Loading...

Amazon SearchBox/ Most Things You buy through here will give us a few cents

Popular Posts

The Forest Needs help

ONE

ONE
Relief World Hunger

Save The Lungs of The Earth

Orangutans ARE Part of the Forest

Love is Sharing

Pride Shack

Gay Male Pride Items #1 (Vertical Banner)

Click Here To Get Anything by Amazon- That will keep US Going

Young Love Collection

CDC

SiGn ThE PeTiTiOn

DVD's

HIV Army

Blog Archive