June 7, 2010

Americans want charges against BP


Poll: Americans want charges against BP

Oil giant and federal government get negative ratings on spill response

Slideshow
Image: A dead fish floats on a pool of oil
  Oil spill disaster in the Gulf
Following a deadly oil rig explosion, crews attempt to contain an underwater oil well gushing thousands of gallons a day, fouling the water and coastline.
Video
  Florida beaches open amid cleanup 
June 5: Along the beaches of the Florida Panhandle, workers and angry residents are picking up tar balls and cleaning up oil. NBC’s Mark Potter reports.
Nightly News
Video
  Obama meets with business owners affected by spill 
June 5: On his third trip to Louisiana since the oil spill began, President Obama kept the heat on BP, while at the same time trying to cool the anger of Gulf residents.
Nightly News


 


Americans overwhelmingly see the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico as a major environmental disaster, and most want the federal government to pursue criminal charges against BP and its drilling partners, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Public complaints against BP are twofold: Most give poor ratings to its reaction to the massive spill, and most blame the company and its drilling partners for taking unnecessary risks that could have caused the spill.

But the government itself is also in the line of fire. More Americans have given negative ratings to federal reaction to the BP spill then poll respondents gave to the government's initial handling of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
Overall, 69 percent of those polled now say the government has done a "not so good" or "poor" job handling the spill. More polled, 81 percent, give low marks to BP for its response. (Some 59 percent give negative ratings to both thefederal government and BP.)
Criticism of the government and BP crosses party lines and spans the country. The Democratic discontent with the government's response today — 56 percent give it low marks — contrasts with majority GOP support for federal efforts a few weeks after Katrina stuck in 2005.
Another sentiment shared across the partisan divide is the rising feeling that the situation in the Gulf represents a major environmental disaster. About three-quarters of those polled now say so, up significantly from a Pew poll last month.
In the new Post-ABC poll, those who see the spill as a disaster overwhelmingly advocate criminal charges against BP and its partners, and altogether 64 percent of Americans say the government should pursue such legal action. Most Democrats (74 percent) and independents (67 percent) support criminal investigation; Republicans divide 50 percent in favor, 44 percent opposed.
The poll was conducted June 3 to 6 among a random national sample of 1,004 adults. The results from the full poll have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.

Bookmark and Share

Arizona School Changes Latino And Black Students' Faces On Mural To White


Arizona School Changes Latino And Black Students' Faces On Mural To White

Arizona School Changes Latino And Black Students' Faces On Mural To White

Update:
I am happy to report that the school has reacted to public outcry and rethought their outrageous decision. Principal Jeff Lane apologized, declaring that he had made a mistake, and that they would "go back with their original theme."

It's great that Lane apologized but still tragic that this incident happened in the first place. Sadly, the underlying attitudes still remain.

_______________________________________________________________

Did I read that correctly? Hard to believe but yes, I did. An Arizona elementary school mural, featuring the faces of kids who attend the school, has attracted the constant yelling of racial epithets and slurs from passing motorists, and  demands that the non-white students' faces be removed from the mural. In response, the principal of the Prescott school has ordered that the faces of the Latino and Black students in the mural be repainted as light-skinned children.

This is a principal with no principles. How can Jeff Lane, the school prinicpal, believe that he is promoting educational excellence for all his students by denying who they are? Ironically, Miller Valley Elementary School has the highest ethnic mix of any school in Prescott. The "Go on Green" mural was designed to advertise a campaign for environmentally friendly transportation and features four children. A Hispanic boy is the central figure, and all the faces were taken from photographs of children enrolled in the K-5 school.

But R.E. Wall, director of Prescott's Downtown Mural Project, said that he had been asked by Lane to lighten the faces of children depicted in the giant public mural "because of the controversy."

What lesson can these children, many of whom have been involved in creating the mural, possibly get from this? Will they learn that when bullies are mean to you, you should appease them and hope that they leave you alone? Will they yet again feel that slap in the face, just like my friend Juanita who entered kindergarten in Phoenix forty years ago, speaking only Spanish, and was told to come back when she could speak English?

Arizona has taken some extreme and racist stands in the past few weeks: first there came the passage of SB 1070, which allows police to ask for legal documentation of anyone who appears to look illegal; next Governor Jan Brewer signed a second bill, this time banning the state's schools from teaching ethnic studies; after that Senator Russell Pearce announced his intention to push for legislation to deny citizenship to children of undocumented aliens. Following this came news that the Arizona Department of Education is telling schools to remove any teachers with heavy accents from English classes.

But this latest action reveals even more fear and loathing. Are we witnessing the last, desperate stand of a white majority, afraid that they will one day be a minority? If they keep this up, it seems pretty clear that we are moving along a disastrous path, and things will not turn out well.

When I moved to the U.S. from my native England, I was excited to be entering a country of immigrants, where I would encounter many diverse ethnicities and cultures. I believed that welcoming such diversity was what this nation was about. What's going on in Arizona, and in some other parts of the country, is shameful and tragic, but it is also alarming. We must work to put a stop to this hatred.


Bookmark and Share

Athletes Join HIV Prevention/Anti-Violence Campaign in South Africa


Athletes Join HIV Prevention/Anti-Violence Campaign in South Africa

posted by: Nicole Nuss 1
Athletes Join HIV Prevention/Anti-Violence Campaign in South Africa

Editor's Note: Here's another great post from our friends over at SOS Children's Villages. This one tells us about Brothers for Life, a campaign just launched in South Africa to coincide with this year's FIFA World Cup. (And in case you live in a cave -- or are just not a sports geek, like myself -- and don't know, this year's World Cup is being held in South Africa.) Athletes have joined the campaign to help raise awareness about HIV prevention and discourage violence towards women.

By Kyna Rubin 
Top sports players from South Africa and elsewhere are joining forces to prevent HIV and violence against South African women and children. The campaign, called Brothers for Life, has kicked off just in time for the FIFA 2010 World Cup, taking place in South Africa this year. 
Thousands of soccer fans from around the world are expected to flock into the country. In light of the drinking and sex that is likely to occur, "we want to encourage people to be safe," Dean Peacock, co-director of Sonke Gender Justice, told the IRIN news service

The group is one of 40 civil society organizations sponsoring the campaign together with the South African National AIDS Council, South Africa's Department of Health, Johns Hopkins Health and Education in South Africa, and the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF). 
The effort targets men, who are considered a neglected demographic in the nation's struggle to prevent HIV/AIDS. The HIV infection rate among South African men, age 25 to 49, is more than double that of the national average -- 24 percent versus 11 percent, according to a 2009 survey by South Africa's Human Sciences Research Council. 
Getting a Positive Message to Men in Their Prime
Among the sports ambassadors for the Brothers for Life campaign are South African soccer players Matthew Booth and Teko Modise, rugby captain John Smit, and cricket captain Graeme Smith. Soccer stars Ryan Giggs of Manchester United and Lionel Messi of FC Barcelona have also signed on to help.
The sports stars will deliver messages on television and radio about the risks of drinking and having unprotected sex. They will also support a nationwide drive to counsel and test for HIV, an initiative launched in April by South Africa President Jacob Zuma. 
Doing the Right Thing for Children and Families
The motto of the Brothers for Life effort is for men to "Do the right thing" -- not only during the World Cup, but for years to come. 

Another group working to do the right thing for children and families in South Africa is SOS Children's Villages. SOS raises children who have lost parental care due to AIDS, poverty or other causes. In South Africa since 1982, SOS runs eight Children's Villages and provides HIV-prevention counseling to vulnerable families. Former President Nelson Mandela and Archbishop Desmond Tutu are longtime advocates of SOS-South Africa.


Bookmark and Share

Gallup Poll Indicates Milestone in America's Acceptance of 'Gay Relations'


Gallup Poll Indicates Milestone in America's Acceptance of 'Gay Relations'

posted by: Steve Williams 1 day ago
Gallup Poll Indicates Milestone in America's Acceptance of 'Gay Relations'
I have blog about his recently, but not with a Gallop Poll. I am still single. Be a good person and take care of your body..oh yes be able to travel to NYC...

Results of Gallup's annual Values and Beliefs survey have been released and the data shows a milestone has been reached in the acceptance of gay and lesbian people in America. For the first time in the poll's ten year history, "the moral acceptability of gay and lesbian relations" has crossed the 50 percent threshold with 52 percent of respondents finding gay relationships morally acceptable while only 43 percent took issue, a new low. Perhaps even more noteworthy, the Gallup poll suggests that the largest change in attitudes over the last four years has come from men, and in particular younger men. 

Conducted each May, the survey has also documented a slight decrease in opposition to gay marriage this year, though a 53 percent majority are still opposed, while support for the legality of gay consensual relations has again gone up this year but still hovers at a slightly depressing 58 percent. 

From the Gallup poll summary:

There is a gradual cultural shift under way in Americans' views toward gay individuals and gay rights. While public attitudes haven't moved consistently in gays' and lesbians' favor every year, the general trend is clearly in that direction. This year, the shift is apparent in a record-high level of the public seeing gay and lesbian relations as morally acceptable. Meanwhile, support for legalizing gay marriage, and for the legality of gay and lesbian relations more generally, is near record highs.
As to the issue of the "moral acceptability" of gay and lesbian relations,New York Times columnist Charles M. Blow has summarized the key findings in an interesting opinion piece:

1. For the first time, the percentage of Americans who perceive “gay and lesbian relations” as morally acceptable has crossed the 50 percent mark. (You have to love the fact that they still use the word “relations.” So quaint.)
2. Also for the first time, the percentage of men who hold that view is greater than the percentage of women who do.
3. This new alignment is being led by a dramatic change in attitudes among younger men, but older men’s perceptions also have eclipsed older women’s. While women’s views have stayed about the same over the past four years, the percentage of men ages 18 to 49 who perceived these “relations” as morally acceptable rose by 48 percent, and among men over 50, it rose by 26 percent.
Why the changes? With the help of Professor Ritch Savin-Williams, writer Blow speculates that acceptance among women may have stalled because, of the two genders, women have always tended to demonstrate higher levels of tolerance in such surveys. Now we see a slowdown as a certain "ceiling effect" occurs while male attitudes that languished behind those of women for several years are now undergoing a dramatic shift and have now started to catch up. 

The reason for this? Blow outlines several theories, including the contact hypothesis. Briefly, it is suggested that as gay and lesbian people come out and are seen in all walks of life and in a range of professions (for instance their inclusion in the Armed Forces and the continued high profile that is being given), the veil of "otherness" that was once perceived to separate them from mainstream society is now being stripped away and therein they are being accepted more readily and at an earlier age, particularly among men.
The article also suggests that scandals surrounding those most outspoken against gay rights - the recent George Rekers case for instance - makes people, especially younger males, less inclined to want to identify as being anti-gay because of the commonly held notion, whatever its base in fact, that being vehemently opposed to gays and lesbians is perhaps an indication of latent same-sex attraction in itself. Thus, males wanting to express confidence in their own sexuality are led to reconsider homophobia and anti-gay rhetoric, perhaps leading them to exhibit a more tolerant attitude because of this.

One opinion that Professor Savin-Williams offers based on his own research is particularly interesting though:
As for the aversion among men, it may be softening a bit. Professor Savin-Williams says that his current research reveals that the fastest-growing group along the sexuality continuum are men who self-identify as “mostly straight” as opposed to labels like “straight,” “gay” or “bisexual.” They acknowledge some level of attraction to other men even as they say that they probably wouldn’t act on it, but ... the right guy, the right day, a few beers and who knows. As the professor points out, you would never have heard that in years past.
You may recall a previous Gallup poll released in February that attempted to quantify how many people supported a repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell', the U.S. military's policy against openly gay service personnel. There was an intriguing element to this poll in that some respondents were asked if they favored "gay people" serving in the military, while others were asked whether they favored "homosexuals" serving. A greater proportion favored gays serving than supported homosexuals, suggesting that the way we describe ourselves and the way we are described by others certainly does matter, especially in this case where the term homosexuality, as adopted by the religious right, has become a clinical sounding word often baring negative connotations. You can read more about that in "Gay and Lesbian or Homosexual: What's in a Word?" 

That, according to Savin-Williams, an increasing proportion of young men are identifying as "mostly straight" rather than just "straight" alone seems to highlight an abandoning of the rigidity we once placed on sexuality and also seems to imply a more tolerant attitude to gay, lesbian and bisexual people as younger men become more amenable to the idea of sexuality being not so fixed and also that same-sex attraction is not necessarily tied to one's perceived masculinity.
Should we then conclude that one component to furthering equality is to start to try and loosen our grip on binary notions of gender and sexuality and to perhaps even shun, where possible, using self-determining labels?Bookmark and Share

SEARCH This BLOG

Loading...

Amazon SearchBox/ Most Things You buy through here will give us a few cents

Popular Posts

The Forest Needs help

ONE

ONE
Relief World Hunger

Save The Lungs of The Earth

Orangutans ARE Part of the Forest

Love is Sharing

Pride Shack

Gay Male Pride Items #1 (Vertical Banner)

Click Here To Get Anything by Amazon- That will keep US Going

Young Love Collection

CDC

SiGn ThE PeTiTiOn

DVD's

HIV Army

Blog Archive