May 4, 2010

Conservatives Balk at Post Reporter's Tweets


Conservatives Balk at Post Reporter's Tweets


THE WASHINGTON POST X390 (GETTY) | ADVOCATE.COM
Conservative groups are crying foul regarding a particular recent hire at The Washington Post. 

Dave Weigel, a blogger who was hired by the newspaper to cover Republicans and conservatives, sent out a tweet Saturday confirming conservatives' apprehension about his coverage. 

"I can empathize with everyone I cover except for the antigay marriage bigots," he wrote. "In 20 years no one will admit they were part of that."

In response, Concerned Women for America's Penny Nance told Politics Daily that assigning Weigel to cover groups like hers is "like assigning a weasel to watch the hen house."

She also said that she would never talk to him. 

Dan Gainor, a vice president at the Media Research Center, added, "This is how the Post covers the conservative movement: Find someone who doesn't even understand the traditional values that made our nation great and then assign him to report on the right."

In a statement to Politico posted on Tuesday, however, Weigel apologized for using the wordbigots but defended his position that actively opposing gay marriage is wrong. 

"But who's threatened by legal same-sex marriage? Whose life is made worse?" he wrote. "If there was science suggesting that children raised by same-sex parents are worse off than children raised by traditional families, that would be one thing, but I haven't seen it. We've watched legal same-sex marriage in several European countries and several states, and it hasn't ushered in some decline in the quality of life, or marriage, for those who don't participate in it."

Bookmark and Share

N.Y. Court Affirms Gay Parental Rights


N.Y. Court Affirms Gay Parental Rights


NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS X390 (FAIR) | ADVOCATE.COM
The New York court of appeals has ruled in two separate cases that nonbiological parents of children raised in same-sex relationship have rights similar to those of biological parents.
The New York Times reports that in one case, the court ruled that a woman has the right to seek child support from her former partner, even though she is not the biological parent. In the other, a woman who entered into a civil union with her partner in Vermont can apply for visitation rights for her nonbiological child following the couple's split.
The court did not go further in defining parental rights for nonbiological parents in same-sex relationships, however.
“It is a narrow victory that will help the children of couples who marry or enter civil unions, but it will not help the children of parents who don’t,” said American University law professor Nancy Polikoff. 

Bookmark and Share

Michael D. Silverman: Community's Integrity At Stake With Transgender Rights


Michael D. Silverman: Community's Integrity At Stake With Transgender Rights

 
SilvermanBy all accounts, the Employment Non Discrimination Act (ENDA) is moving towards a vote in the House. As it does so, the battle lines are becoming clearer, and once again it looks like the issue of transgender inclusion in ENDA is going to be front and center.
Certainly, the right wing is throttling transgender inclusion for all it's worth. The so-called Traditional Values Coalitionhas been on a tear about it since Congress returned from recess a few weeks ago. They've even gotten CBS News to legitimize the debate on their terms, using the usual types of anti-LGBT scare tactics to warn parents about the dangers ENDA allegedly poses to the health and well being of children.
So far, our side is sticking together on the issue of transgender inclusion in the face of these attacks. But there are worrisome signs. Barney Frank, ENDA's sponsor, has ominously stated that there may be problems with transgender inclusion. It's not hard to imagine a scenario of backroom wheeling and dealing that leads to transgender inclusion being dropped because it's politically expedient to do so. And it's also not hard to imagine the justification: that it's better to get something than nothing.
Well, not in this case. The price is just too high. Our integrity as a community is on the line, and we betray ourselves and all that our movement stands for by throwing the most vulnerable members of our community overboard when the seas get choppy.
Transgender people face tremendous discrimination in the workplace. One recentsurvey found that 47% of transgender people report being fired, or denied a job or promotion, just because of who they are.
Few protections exist for transgender people who experience employment discrimination. In 38 states there is no law protecting transgender people from being fired because of who they are. Of course, in 29 states, there is also no law protecting lesbians and gay men from being fired because of who they are.
The crazy thing is, while we're gnashing our teeth over transgender inclusion, the other side is laughing. They'll fight this bill tooth and nail either way. Because at the end of the day, the distinctions we make in our community are distinctions with no difference to those who hate us. Take Zikerria Bellamy's case which is currently pending in Florida. 17-year-old Zikerria, who is transgender, applied for a job at a McDonald’s restaurant in Orlando. The manager she talked to about the job knew her only as Zikerria, the name she uses in everyday life. At 17, though, she had not yet made it her legal name. When the time came to fill out a paper application for the job, Zikerria listed her legal male name for tax and payroll purposes. When the manager saw her male name and realized that she’s transgender, he refused to hire her. He later left her a voicemail messagetelling her, “We do not hire fa**ots.”
If teens in our community can't even get jobs at places like McDonald's - on the first rung of the economic ladder - where can they? Is there really someone among us who is prepared to say that what happened to Zikerria should be illegal when it comes to lesbian, gay and bisexual teens, but okay when it happens to a transgender teen?
When we're faced with the choice to stand together in unity and to raise our voices as one, or to unburden ourselves of the most marginalized members of our community, let's choose unity. Not just for ourselves, but for the youth in our movement - Zikerria and the hundreds of thousands of other LGBT teens out there. They're watching what we do. Our integrity is at stake. We must not surrender it
Michael Silverman (photograph) is Executive Director of the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund located in New York City. Go to www.transgenderlegal.org for further informatio

Bookmark and Share

DADT: Disgusting that the LGBT are being used as a Political Issue



DADT: Simply Disgusting

May 32010
President+Obama+Dedicates+Abraham+Lincoln+GeYLO8AE4OBlThe White House and the Department of Defense are using the LGBT community's freedom and equality as a political issue. The 'private letter' to Capitol Hill by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates demanding that Congress not move on repeal before the completion of a study by the military over the next year is outrageous. In the letter Gates says repealing DADT now 'would send a very damaging message to our men and women in uniform that in essence their views, concerns and perspectives do not matter.' There is no question that this letter provides cover to Blue Dog Democrats up for reelection and has a chilling effect on our chances of repeal before the elections.
The White House press operation responded with gibberish nonsense about their commitment that we have heard a thousand times. In no way did they indicate that the Defense Secretary's position is not their own. Does anyone above the 8th grade really believe the White House wasn't fully aware of the Secretary's comments to Congress? If so, I have a bridge I want to sell you.
Using the LGBT community's rights one more time as a political football, they continue to systematically deny us full equality. The entire process now reeks of political opportunism and cowardice at the expense of millions of Americans' equality. Promises have been broken left and right by the administration when it comes to LGBT rights. Their silence is as powerful as their actions.
Rightfully responding to the oppressive laws in Arizona, the administration has shown it can indeed involve itself in state's human rights issues. Their actions regarding Arizona make their silence on the passage of Proposition 8 and the repeal in Maine all the more dastardly. To add insult to injury, the Justice Department is having a field day opposing our court cases, the legislation giving Federal Employees full equality is moving so slow that it is embarrassing, ENDA was promised in March and it is now May and we were removed from the healthcare bill. There is, without a doubt, a complete lack of a moral center in this administration when it comes to LGBT issues.
Secretary Gates' letter, clearly an attempt to stop any repeal of DADT before the election, is just one more piece of this puzzle of not taking the LGBT struggle for full equality seriously. If we had any doubts of their willingness to allow us to continue to live as second class citizens for political reasons they should be erased with this letter. The missive isn't even clever in its raw attempt to create more and more delay.
The White House keeps saying over and over again that DADT will be repealed. The time has come for them to explain to us how they expect that to happen if Republicans control one of the two houses of Congress. The fact is, as we all have been saying for a year, the President can do what he has the power to do and that is issue a 'stop-loss' order immediately until the offensive study is completed. Please, someone please explain to me what they are hoping to discover about us in order to allow us to serve with honor?
This letter, the White House response, its impact on Congress and the playing of politics with people's freedom can only be described as simply disgusting. The White House, Secretary Gates and anyone who supports this effort should be totally ashamed
 
 
 
 
 
rated 4.58 by 12 people [?]

GET EQUAL: Several Hundred At White House Protest; Six Arrested

May 22010
Several hundred people led by military vets held a rally today at the White House. Six brave protesters chained themselves to the White House fence and have been arrested. This continues the series of nationwide protests around the country against DADT organized by Get Equal. In a surprise appearance, former Presidential candidate and National Democratic Committee Chair Governor Howard Dean spoke at the protest. Dean's attendance at the rally is an indication that even the leaders of the Democratic Party are losing patience with the foot dragging of this administration on DADT.  Lt. Dan Choi joined Dean in addressing the rally.
 Bravo to those arrested today and my deep thanks.  (Thanks to Pam Spaulding of PamsHouseBlend.com for the photograph).
Howarddeanrally
   

Bookmark and Share

A Letter to The Commander in Chief a Former US Navy Petty Officer on DADT


May 3, 2010
President Barack H. Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. President,
After the recent letter by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates recommended the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” be delayed, this is my plea to you on the behalf of the soldiers serving in silence to end this law now:
I never wanted anything more in my life than to be a career officer. My entire childhood I was exposed to abuse, violence, and crime. I came out of it all with a simple, yet overwhelming desire to serve. When my first attempt at getting into the Naval Academy failed, I waited restlessly until I turned eighteen. I enlisted on my birthday and set off to prove myself to the Academy. I was eager to leave the cruelty of my past and join a true family.
JosephRochaI knew I was gay, but it was irrelevant to me then. I was determined to join an elite team of handlers working with dogs trained to detect explosives. As I studied hard to pass exams and complete training, I was convinced that the current law would protect me. I knew that based on merit and achievement I would excel in the military.
I never told anyone I was gay. But a year and a half later while serving in the Middle East, I was tormented by my chief and fellow sailors, physically and emotionally, as they had their suspicions. The irony of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is that it protects bigots and punishes gays who comply.
Shop talk in the unit revolved around sex, either the prostitute-filled parties of days past or the escapades my comrades looked forward to. They interpreted my silence and total lack of interest as an admission of homosexuality. My higher-ups seemed to think that gave them the right to bind me to chairs, ridicule me, hose me down and lock me in a feces-filled dog kennel.
On one day in the Middle East, I was ordered by a superior to get down on my hands and knees and simulate oral sex on a person working in the kennel. We were supposed to pretend that we were in our bedroom and that the dogs were catching us in the act. Over and over, with each of the dogs in our unit, I was forced to endure this scenario.
I told no one about what I was living through. I feared that reporting the abuse would lead to an investigation into my sexuality. Frankly, as we continue to delay the repeal of this horrible law, I can’t help but wonder how many people find themselves in similar, despicable situations and remain silent. My anger today doesn’t come from the abuse, but rather from the inhumanity of a standing law that allowed for it.
Three and a half years later when the Navy started investigating claims of hazing, I had finally earned my place at the Naval Academy Preparatory School. But instead of celebration, I began to question the life of persecution, degradation, and dishonor DADT had forced on me. I questioned the institution -- our great military -- that would condone and endorse this kind of treatment of its own members. The only thing I had ever done wrong was to want the same thing my straight counterparts wanted: a brotherhood and something to stand for.
At NAPS I realized that a career of service under DADT would be a forfeiture of my basic human rights. It would be a forfeiture of basic job security, peace of mind, and meaningful relationships, particularly with my fellow straight service members whom I was forced to deceive and betray.
After completing a six-week officer candidate boot camp, my commanders said they wanted to offer me a leadership role. But after what happened in the Middle East and even the suicide of my close friend, I was mentally and emotionally depleted. And so -- with my knees buckling -- I offered my statement of resignation in writing:
"I am a homosexual. I deeply regret that my personal feelings are not compatible with Naval regulations or policy. I am proud of my service and had hoped I would be able to serve the Navy and the country for my entire career. However, the principles of honor, courage and commitment mean I must be honest with myself, courageous in my beliefs, and committed in my action. I understand that this statement will be used to end my Naval career."
They say some people are just born designed for military service. It‘s the way we are wired, and the only thing that makes us happy. For too many of us, it‘s the only family we ever had. I am sure now, more than ever, after all the loss and hardship under DADT, that all I want to do is serve as a career military officer.
Mr. President, any delay in repeal is a clear signal to our troops that their gay brothers and sisters in arms are not equal to them. I plead that you take the lead -- fight for repeal -- and allow qualified men and women to serve their country.
Very respectfully,
Joseph Christopher Rocha
Former Petty Officer Third Class, U.S. Navy

Bookmark and Share

New York Times Review: Alan Cumming Receives Rave In New York


New York Times Review: Alan Cumming Receives Rave In New York

 
Cumming1-articleInline 
The New York Times, in a rave review written by Stephen Holden, says it best:
"Taking command of the stage with the ease of a vaudevillian who has been treading the boards for decades, Mr. Cumming entertained with a capital E. With his slightly dandified pied-piper charm, he might be described as a modern-day Noël Coward, or as the successor to Peter Allen, who was coy about his sexuality, whereas Mr. Cumming is openly gay and politically engaged with gay causes.
With arched eyebrows like twin crescent moons and a friendly leer, Mr. Cumming has a clown’s facial mobility. As he belted the drag rock anthems from “Hedwig and the Angry Inch,” the late-1990s show that is still ahead of its time, his body language was broadly, sometimes comically, emotive. His singing with its strong Scottish burr may be far from beautiful, but it is bluntly expressive. Accompanying him were two musicians, his musical director and sometime songwriting collaborator Lance Horne on piano, and Yair Evnine on cello."
Make your reservations now for his return engagement June 22 to June 26. My guess if you don't call (212) 339-4095 very soon, the place will sell out!

Bookmark and Share

President Obama, Alice in Wonderland and The LGBT Community



President Obama, Alice in Wonderland and The LGBT Community

  
Alice_lgFor the last several months, watching the Obama team come to terms with our epic struggle for freedom is like watching the 3-D version of "Alice in Wonderland." Their actions are so bizarre and out of touch and you encounter one strange character in the saga after another. No action seems to fit the reality of the times. Often you feel the only way to understand their policies on LGBT Americans is to be stoned, sit back and try to enjoy.
Clearly the entire Obama team just don't get it. They don't understand our goal. Nor do they really believe we are in the middle of an epic struggle for civil rights. They have checked out mentally and emotionally to the point where their actions aren't deliberately planned but because of them, we are just ignored. Not even being on their radar screen after decades for working within the Democratic Party is more shocking.
The most recent example is the Democratic National Committee video sent out of the President appearing to ask everyone except the LGBT community to come together to defeat the Republicans in November. Do I think this was deliberate? No, it just means they aren't even thinking of us when it come to grand coalitions. That is much worse. How can a video like that get out with person after person in the DNC and the White House reviewing the video? Didn't the LGBT high hierarchy and staff at the DNC who ask us for huge sums of money over and over again see it? Who can argue that we should not give one penny more to the Democratic National Committee?
Then all we have to do is travel down Pennsylvania Ave on this strange journey to the Department of Justice. Recently one of their lawyers attempted, with great pride, to show how they had improved their language in opposing LGBT rights. That would be like African-Americans in their past historic struggle being told they should be grateful that the "N" word wasn't used as their oppressors attempted to stop them from achieving voting rights. There is no sign that the Department of Justice is backing away at all from their proactive stances against our struggle in their increasingly number of briefs. There is no sign of personnel changes or accountability for their disgusting words and briefs.
Finally we can continue our "magical mystical tour" over to the White House. Really, it can't get any more bizarre than to find out that Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN), our community's leading organization in this battle in fighting for the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", was banned from meetings regarding that issue in the White House. More outrageously, our national LGBT organizations found that action to be appropriate and went to the meetings anyway. You have got to be kidding! The President, after twice mentioning DADT in his State of the Union speech, now seems to be a major obstacle in an increasingly sympathetic Congress to the repeal of DADT. Instead of leading with such strong words by the President, the White House is indicating that they want to wait until next year after they study us and see if we are fit patriotic Americans to serve. Can anyone make sense of this to me? The President publicly and movingly says one thing and then his staff actively proceeds to fight for delay.
Let's be very clear. Anyone who is for delays, given the likely results of this year's election, is fighting against us. They know and we know that the time is now. Actually the time was last year and this administration and our national organizations blew it.
Finally, in our tour of "Alice's World" we have to look at our own community. And I am going to say it: The Human Rights Campaign led by Joe Solmonese has let this community down. Last year they missed a year of incredible opportunity. They gave the President permission to delay in some sort of misguided grand political plan. They believed that the piecemeal approach of one piece of legislation this year and another maybe next year was the way to go. There is no question we should celebrate long and hard if ENDA does pass but that doesn't mean everyone is off the hook for another year or two until they feel like dealing with immigration issues, healthcare issues, repeal of DOMA and repeal of DADT. We have watched all LGBT issues stripped from the current healthcare legislation with hardly a ripple from HRC. We are about to watch the same thing happen with the Immigration legislation. We need full equality now and not over the next eight years.
At the height of this battle, for some reason Joe Solmonese traveled to London with the vote on ENDA, according to HRC happening in the next couple of weeks. Maybe there was a good reason or maybe Joe wasn't busy, but image is everything. This image leaves an impression of not leading and trusting too much in others. Joe: stay home, make this happen and restore our faith in HRC or get out. HRC has enormous resources and a history of some very talented people serving this community. They are increasingly on a broad scale losing credibility and faith in their ability to lead with an amazing number of people. If they are to remain an important and valued force, as I hope they will, they are at the stage where they must make significant visible changes or simply lose our confidence .
Welcome to "Alice in Wonderland."

Bookmark and Share

Christian right leader George Rekers takes vacation with "rent boy"


Christian right leader George Rekers takes vacation with "rent boy"

6a00d8341c730253ef0134805dea2d970c-pi.jpg

The pictures on the Rentboy.com profile show a shirtless young man with delicate features, guileless eyes, and sun-kissed, hairless skin. The profile touts his "smooth, sweet, tight ass" and "perfectly built 8 inch cock (uncut)" and explains he is "sensual," "wild," and "up for anything" — as long you ask first. And as long as you pay.



On April 13, the "rent boy" (whom we'll call Lucien) arrived at Miami International Airport on Iberian Airlines Flight 6123, after a ten-day, fully subsidized trip to Europe. He was soon followed out of customs by an old man with an atavistic mustache and a desperate blond comb-over, pushing an overburdened baggage cart.
That man was George Alan Rekers, of North Miami — the callboy's client and, as it happens, one of America's most prominent anti-gay activists. Rekers, a Baptist minister who is a leading scholar for the Christian right, left the terminal with his gay escort, looking a bit discomfited when a picture of the two was snapped with a hot-pink digital camera.
Reached by New Times before a trip to Bermuda, Rekers said he learned Lucien was a prostitute only midway through their vacation. "I had surgery," Rekers said, "and I can't lift luggage. That's why I hired him." (Though medical problems didn't stop him from pushing the tottering baggage cart through MIA.)
Yet Rekers wouldn't deny he met his slender, blond escort at Rentboy.com — which features homepage images of men in bondage and grainy videos of crotch-rubbing twinks — and Lucien confirmed it.
At the small western Miami townhome he shares with a roommate, a nervous Lucien expressed surprise when we told him that Rekers denied knowing about his line of work from the beginning. "He should've been able to tell you that," he said, fidgeting and fixing his eyes on his knees. "But that's up to him."
For decades, George Alan Rekers has been a general in the culture wars, though his work has often been behind the scenes. In 1983, he and James Dobson, America's best-known homophobe, formed the Family Research Council, a D.C.-based, rabidly Christian, and vehemently anti-gay lobbying group that has become a standard-bearer of the nation's extreme right wing. Its annual Values Summit is considered a litmus test for Republican presidential hopefuls, and Sean Hannityand Ann Coulter have spoken there. (The Family Research Council would not comment about Rekers's Euro-trip.)
He has also influenced American politics, serving in advisory roles with Congress, the White House, and the Department of Health and Human Services and testifying as a state's witness in favor of Florida's gay adoption ban. A former research fellow at Harvard University and a distinguished professor of neuropsychiatry at the University of South Carolina, Rekers has published papers and books by the hundreds, with titles like Who Am I? Lord and Growing Up Straight: What Families Should Know About Homosexuality.
"While he keeps a low public profile, his fingerprints are on almost every anti-gay effort to demean and dehumanize LGBT people," says Wayne Besen, a gay rights advocate in New York City and the executive director of Truth Wins Out, which investigates the anti-gay movement. "His work is ubiquitously cited by lobby groups that work to deny equality to LGBT Americans. Rekers has caused a great deal of harm to gay and lesbian individuals."
Rekers is a board member of the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), an organization that systematically attempts to turn gay people straight. And theHuffington Post recently singled out Rekers as a member of the American College of Pediatricians— an official-sounding outfit in Gainesville that purveys lurid, youth-directed literature accusing gays of en masse coprophilia. (In an email, the college's Lisa Hawkins wrote, "ACPeds feels privileged to have a scholar of Dr. Rekers' stature affiliated with our organization. I am sure you will find Prof. Rekers to be an immaculate clinician/scholar, and a warm human being.")
Rekers lectures worldwide, from Europe to the Middle East, on teen sexuality. Yet during his ten-day sojourn with Lucien to London and Madrid, he had no lectures scheduled. Both men deny having sex on the trip, and emails exchanged between the two before their jaunt are cautiously worded.
"I'd like to propose another trip to Rome, Italy, for a week or more," Rekers wrote in an email dated March 21 obtained by New Times. "This is so exciting to have a nice Travel Assistant and traveling companion! Wow! I'm so glad I met you."
"I called and talked to the reservation guy in London and reserved a room with two twin beds," Rekers wrote on March 26.
"Now that I'm packed, tomorrow I'll work on completing my income tax return," Rekers wrote two days later. "Not fun... But I'll just remind myself that the fun trip is coming soon."
In his interview with New Times, Lucien didn't want to impugn his client, but he made it clear they met through Rentboy.com, which is the only website on which he advertises his services. NeitherGoogle nor any other search engine picks up individual Rentboy.com profiles, any more than they pick up individual profiles on eHarmony or Match.com. You cannot just happen upon one.
To arrive at Lucien's site, Rekers must have accepted Rentboy.com's terms of use, thereby acknowledging he was not offended by graphic sexual material. He then would have been transported to a front page covered with images of naked, tumescent men busily sodomizing each other.
Then Rekers must have performed a search. Did he want a "rentboy," a "sugar daddy," or a "masseur"? In what country? And what city? If Rekers searched for a rent boy in Miami, he would have found approximately 80 likely candidates. He must have scrolled down the first page, past the shirtless bears and desperate ex-models, and on to page 2. There, at last, was Lucien.
Indeed, much of Rekers's activism over the past three decades — beginning with his 1983 book,Shaping Your Child's Sexual Identity — has been devoted to improving children's lives by educating them, protecting them from their own budding sexualities, and keeping them safe from gay adoptions — as he did by testifying as an expert witness in favor of gay adoption bans in both Arkansas and Florida.As a favor to Rekers, Lucien recently removed any wanton sexual descriptors from his Rentboy profile. Though he does admit Rekers "likes younger guys to hang out with," Lucien is protective of his erstwhile client. He describes Rekers primarily as a family man — one whose passion for oppressing homosexuals is dwarfed by his desire to help children. "You don't understand how much this guy honestly cares about taking care of kids," he says.
Well, it's a good thing Rekers isn't gay himself. Lucien tells us that Rekers frequently takes in foster children and that four years ago he adopted a 16-year-old boy. We found the boy, who is now Lucien's age, on Facebook. He declined to be interviewed.

Bookmark and Share

SEARCH This BLOG

Loading...

Amazon SearchBox/ Most Things You buy through here will give us a few cents

Popular Posts

The Forest Needs help

ONE

ONE
Relief World Hunger

Save The Lungs of The Earth

Orangutans ARE Part of the Forest

Love is Sharing

Pride Shack

Gay Male Pride Items #1 (Vertical Banner)

Click Here To Get Anything by Amazon- That will keep US Going

Young Love Collection

CDC

SiGn ThE PeTiTiOn

DVD's

HIV Army

Blog Archive